Got a few one at www.bhmotorsports.com
Graphically it looks a bit like Race Driver, also by Codemasters.
Coincidence?
--
Philippe "Philster" Sergerie
"Philster" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:hYIS9.41923$[email hidden]...
> Got a few one at www.bhmotorsports.com
>
> Graphically it looks a bit like Race Driver, also by Codemasters.
> Coincidence?
Course not - they're not going to write two graphics engines for racing
titles released within a few months of each other
ISI have used the same one since 2000 ( all be it tweaked )
Doug
"Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:t5JS9.3198$xE1.488665@stones...
Come to think of it - good ol Geoff's been using the same one for 7 years.
Doug
Quoted text (12 lines)
> > "Philster" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:hYIS9.41923$[email hidden]... > > Got a few one at www.bhmotorsports.com > > > > Graphically it looks a bit like Race Driver, also by Codemasters. > > Coincidence? > > Course not - they're not going to write two graphics engines for racing > titles released within a few months of each other > > ISI have used the same one since 2000 ( all be it tweaked )I like the looks of the tracks, but the cars seem to suffer from over done
lighting. Makes me think a lot of NASCAR Thunder. The cars look like they
are coated in wax or something more than a real reflection. I do think the
graphics need to be sharpened up but that might have to do more with the
pics themselves than the game.
MadDAWG
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 23:11:38 -0000, "Doug Ellison"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Well, so has papy since GPL. Also tweaked.
Quoted text (20 lines)
> >"Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:t5JS9.3198$xE1.488665@stones... >> >> "Philster" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:hYIS9.41923$[email hidden]... >> > Got a few one at www.bhmotorsports.com >> > >> > Graphically it looks a bit like Race Driver, also by Codemasters. >> > Coincidence? >> >> Course not - they're not going to write two graphics engines for racing >> titles released within a few months of each other >> >> ISI have used the same one since 2000 ( all be it tweaked ) > >Come to think of it - good ol Geoff's been using the same one for 7 years. > >Doug >> Well, so has papy since GPL. Also tweaked.
I would find it hard to believe that from GPL to Nascar 4 wasnt a major
overhaul
DOug
I always noticed stuff like you mention, overdone reflections and such tend
to look better in motion than in screenshots. But, yeah those cars look
nicely waxed :)
Mike
http://mikebeauchamp.com
"MadDAWG" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (9 lines)
> I like the looks of the tracks, but the cars seem to suffer from over done > lighting. Makes me think a lot of NASCAR Thunder. The cars look like they > are coated in wax or something more than a real reflection. I do think the > graphics need to be sharpened up but that might have to do more with the > pics themselves than the game. > > MadDAWG > >>. But, yeah those cars look
> nicely waxed :)
I was thinking more like a candle dripped over them myself. I really don't
like that effect. It seems to wash out a lot of the details, and makes it
look blurry for lack of a better word.
MadDAWG
"MadDAWG" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
: >. But, yeah those cars look
: > nicely waxed :)
:
:
: I was thinking more like a candle dripped over them myself. I really
don't
: like that effect. It seems to wash out a lot of the details, and makes it
: look blurry for lack of a better word.
Probably because its done per vertex not per pixel.
Per pixel shaded reflections would be sharper and less intrusive and washed
out.
I think.
Doug
Quoted text (8 lines)
>>"Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>Come to think of it - good ol Geoff's been using the same one for 7 years. >> >>Doug >> > >"Presuming Ed" <[email hidden]> wrote > Well, so has papy since GPL. Also tweaked.On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:58:48 -0500, "ymenard"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
I wasn't defending him at all. I just wanted to point out that most
companies will build upon their existing products rather than start
from scratch every time. Makes sense really.


































