nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass

I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds stupid. Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other tracks, Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I like traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). Rich

Coca Cola is a fictional track...fun as hell tho to just imagine..... "RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds > stupid. > > Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the othertracks, > Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, Ilike > traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). > > Rich

"RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds > stupid. > > Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the othertracks, > Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, Ilike > traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at least you can use the run-off on the back straight. __ Si.

ok, thanks for the replys... I guess I can cancel my plans for heading for that track event... ;-) Rich

Quoted text (31 lines)

>Subject: Re: nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass >From: "Fillyourboots" [email hidden] >Date: 2/9/03 8:14 PM Eastern Standard Time >Message-id: <b26udo$u5$[email hidden]> > >"RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds >> stupid. >> >> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other >tracks, >> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I >like >> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). > > >For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a >Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the >most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and >race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and >you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at >least you can use the run-off on the back straight. > >__ >Si. > > > > >

I got two tix I can send ya, right here....... Cheap. 8-) RLevy10638 wrote:

Quoted text (36 lines)

> ok, thanks for the replys... I guess I can cancel my plans for heading for that > track event... ;-) > > Rich > > >Subject: Re: nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass > >From: "Fillyourboots" [email hidden] > >Date: 2/9/03 8:14 PM Eastern Standard Time > >Message-id: <b26udo$u5$[email hidden]> > > > >"RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >news:[email hidden]... > >> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds > >> stupid. > >> > >> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other > >tracks, > >> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I > >like > >> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). > > > > > >For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a > >Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the > >most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and > >race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and > >you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at > >least you can use the run-off on the back straight. > > > >__ > >Si. > > > > > > > > > >

I got two tix I can send ya, right here....... Cheap. 8-)

Quoted text (31 lines)

> ok, thanks for the replys... I guess I can cancel my plans for heading for that > track event... ;-) > Rich > >Subject: Re: nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass > >Date: 2/9/03 8:14 PM Eastern Standard Time > >> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds > >> stupid. > >> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the other > >tracks, > >> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, I > >like > >> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). > >For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run on a > >Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, not the > >most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible driving and > >race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4 and > >you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks. at > >least you can use the run-off on the back straight. > >__ > >Si.

SOLD! :) Mike http://mikebeauchamp.com "BRH @attbi.com>" <"bertrh<no-spam> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> I got two tix I can send ya, right here....... Cheap. 8-) > > > > RLevy10638 wrote: > > > ok, thanks for the replys... I guess I can cancel my plans for heading

for that

Quoted text (12 lines)

> > track event... ;-) > > > > Rich > > > > >Subject: Re: nr2003 Coca Cola... Concorde , Mass > > >From: "Fillyourboots" [email hidden] > > >Date: 2/9/03 8:14 PM Eastern Standard Time > > >Message-id: <b26udo$u5$[email hidden]> > > > > > >"RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > >news:[email hidden]... > > >> I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question

sounds > > >> stupid. > > >> > > >> Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but theother > > >tracks, > > >> Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem withit, I > > >like > > >> traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). > > > > > > > > >For no other reason than it's a fantasy track, an opportunity to run ona > > >Super Speedway-style track without restrictor plates. I like it, notthe > > >most demanding course but it's a good exercise in responsible drivingand > > >race strategy. Until you see the AI attempting to go 4-wide out of T4and > > >you know the start/finish straight is going to be littered with wrecks.at

Quoted text (10 lines)

> > >least you can use the run-off on the back straight. > > > > > >__ > > >Si. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>"RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote > ok, thanks for the replys... I guess I can cancel my plans for heading forthat > track event... ;-) You would have only arrived at the Papy HQ with that plane ticket to Concord, MA <G>` -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- http://ymenard.cjb.net/ -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Coca-Cola is a Fantasy Track that doesn't really exist. Larry "RLevy10638" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I am a newbe with the Nascar thing, so bear with me if the question sounds > stupid. > > Is there a reason that Con, Mass has no restrictor plates but the othertracks, > Daytona, Talledega and I think Darlington do? I have no problem with it, Ilike > traveling along at 235-240 mph... very exhilirating (sp). > > Rich