NASCAR 2003 Setups

Are any available? TIA -TAz

B. Stanley has some up on the Team Lightspeed forum 87RedVette "TAZ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:vBY1a.15617$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> Are any available? > > TIA > > -TAz > >

These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like crap *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003, they are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drive pretty good too. -Chad "87RedVette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:LEY1a.26341$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (17 lines)

> B. Stanley has some up on the Team Lightspeed forum > > 87RedVette > > > > "TAZ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:vBY1a.15617$[email hidden]... > > Are any available? > > > > TIA > > > > -TAz > > > > > >

What's the link? Pete "shpankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:vOZ1a.19071$[email hidden]... > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like crap > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003, they > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drive prettygood > too. > > -Chad

http://www.nobullsimracing.com/ So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the negative wedge. "Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:wj_1a.1868$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (8 lines)

> What's the link? > > Pete > > "shpankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:vOZ1a.19071$[email hidden]... > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like crap > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003,

they

Quoted text (7 lines)

> > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drive pretty > good > > too. > > > > -Chad > >

http://www.nobullsimracing.com/ So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the negative wedge.

Quoted text (9 lines)

> What's the link? > Pete > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like *** > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003,

they > > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drive pretty > good > > too. > > -Chad

Okay, before some one calls me on it, should have said add positive wedge :-) "Bob G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:LA02a.5969$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> http://www.nobullsimracing.com/ > > So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the negative > wedge. > > > "Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:wj_1a.1868$[email hidden]... > > What's the link? > > > > Pete > > > > "shpankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:vOZ1a.19071$[email hidden]... > > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like

crap > > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003, > they > > > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drivepretty

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > good > > > too. > > > > > > -Chad > > > > > >

Actually "remove negative" is how I think too. :-) "Bob G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9C02a.5971$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (9 lines)

> Okay, before some one calls me on it, should have said add positive wedge > :-) > > > "Bob G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:LA02a.5969$[email hidden]... > > http://www.nobullsimracing.com/ > > > > So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the

negative

Quoted text (14 lines)

> > wedge. > > > > > > "Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:wj_1a.1868$[email hidden]... > > > What's the link? > > > > > > Pete > > > > > > "shpankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:vOZ1a.19071$[email hidden]... > > > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like > crap > > > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in

2003,

Quoted text (13 lines)

> > they > > > > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drive > pretty > > > good > > > > too. > > > > > > > > -Chad > > > > > > > > > > > >

Actually "remove negative" is how I think too. :-)

Quoted text (9 lines)

> Okay, before some one calls me on it, should have said add positive wedge > :-) > > [link lost in import] > > So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the

negative

Quoted text (15 lines)

> > wedge. > > > What's the link? > > > Pete > > > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like > *** > > > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in

2003,

Quoted text (7 lines)

> > they > > > > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drive > pretty > > > good > > > > too. > > > > -Chad

I had to add - wedge to make it quick for me. Well, it was ok as it was but just too tight. "Bob G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:LA02a.5969$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> http://www.nobullsimracing.com/ > > So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the negative > wedge. > > > "Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:wj_1a.1868$[email hidden]... > > What's the link? > > > > Pete > > > > "shpankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:vOZ1a.19071$[email hidden]... > > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like

crap > > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003, > they > > > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drivepretty

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > good > > > too. > > > > > > -Chad > > > > > >

Yeah, is he running his typical -150 pounds in these? :) Larry "Bob G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:LA02a.5969$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> http://www.nobullsimracing.com/ > > So far, I personally think Stanley's are better if you reduce the negative > wedge. > > > "Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:wj_1a.1868$[email hidden]... > > What's the link? > > > > Pete > > > > "shpankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:vOZ1a.19071$[email hidden]... > > > These are some of the worst setups I've ever ran. They handle like

crap > > > *AND* they are slow. Download NBSR's 2002 setups and drop em in 2003, > they > > > are cRaZy fast! With a little tweaking you can get them to drivepretty

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > good > > > too. > > > > > > -Chad > > > > > >

Yes there are. I found a qual set for daytona that hits 47.2's real easy ( in 70 deg weather ). Found a race setup that does ok, but could use a little work. "TAZ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:vBY1a.15617$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> Are any available? > > TIA > > -TAz > >

You know, the stock qual setup has been working pretty good for me. I lost the handle on SS qualing when N4 came out, but with NR2003 I'm back in the top 2 or 3, sometimes a pole. Either that, or the cheaters haven't figured out the new game yet :) Larry "jon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:BEa2a.41418$[email hidden]... > Yes there are. I found a qual set for daytona that hits 47.2's real easy ( > in 70 deg weather ). Found a race setup that does ok, but could use alittle

Quoted text (14 lines)

> work. > > "TAZ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:vBY1a.15617$[email hidden]... > > Are any available? > > > > TIA > > > > -TAz > > > > > > >