Which is the best choice: Athlon XP 2600 or P4 2.5 (or 2.8?) GHz?
Are there some specific benchmarks for NR2003 with these CPU?
I think they are about equal.
Larry
"ZP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:dlXja.86505$[email hidden]...
> Which is the best choice: Athlon XP 2600 or P4 2.5 (or 2.8?) GHz?
>
> Are there some specific benchmarks for NR2003 with these CPU?
>
>
"ZP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:dlXja.86505$[email hidden]...
> Which is the best choice: Athlon XP 2600 or P4 2.5 (or 2.8?) GHz?
as larry stated, for all intents and purposes, they shoud be withing a few
fps of each other.
wait......i mean.........go with AMD, intel suxors. :)
"kelley" <kelley@ (blackfoot.net)> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> "ZP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:dlXja.86505$[email hidden]...
> > Which is the best choice: Athlon XP 2600 or P4 2.5 (or 2.8?) GHz?
the 2.5 and the 2600 would be a close match - the Athlon taking it
They're about the same price - but the 2.8G is twice as expensive - so I'd
suggest the money would be better spent elsewhere instead of a 200mhz
increase in CPU speed
Doug
I have always been a diehard intel fan, till
now. IMO best boom for the buck
is the Athlon XP 2500. Coupled with
a Asus A7N8X and dual channel
DDR. The answer to your
question relies heavily on what
graphics card u have.
- Paul
"Paul D. Yuknis" <[email hidden]> ha scritto nel ......
.... The answer to your
> question relies heavily on what
> graphics card u have.
An Albatron Geforce 4 (Ti4600 with 128 Mb)
.... The answer to your
An Albatron Geforce 4 (Ti4600 with 128 Mb)
For Intel, I think the 2.53 is the sweet spot right now.
Larry
"Doug Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:b6rocv$7o4rs$[email hidden]...
