NR2003 faster under XP?

Currently running Win ME, wonder if NR2003 might be faster (fps) under XP Geforce Ti 4400 P4 1.8 o/c 2.25 512 MB DDR RAM SB Live 5.1 60 GB ATA 100 Abit bd-7 Thanks exx

Faster? No, not unless you have something misconfigured on your current OS. XP can be about the same speed as long as you have it configured properly and have enough computer to begin with, but I actually doubt anyone would say their performance increased any appreciable amount by moving to XP. -- Biz "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and the....." - Ash "extractor @lycos.com" <=removespam=> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Currently running Win ME, wonder if NR2003 might be faster (fps) under > XP > > Geforce Ti 4400 > P4 1.8 o/c 2.25 > 512 MB DDR RAM > SB Live 5.1 > 60 GB ATA 100 > Abit bd-7 > > Thanks exx

Yeah that's what I thought, even though Nvidia releases XP drivers before ME, I belive two identically configured systems, you mighwould get identical or slightly faster fps in Me, than xp. But only a guess. On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 02:30:55 GMT, "Biz" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Faster? No, not unless you have something misconfigured on your current OS. XP can be about the >same speed as long as you have it configured properly and have enough computer to begin with, but I >actually doubt anyone would say their performance increased any appreciable amount by moving to XP.

When I upgraded to XP I ran 3dMark2001se and got a measured 10% increase imediately, I made no other changes. Andi. "extractor @lycos.com" <=removespam=> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (9 lines)

> Yeah that's what I thought, even though Nvidia releases XP drivers > before ME, I belive two identically configured systems, you mighwould > get identical or slightly faster fps in Me, than xp. But only a > guess. > > On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 02:30:55 GMT, "Biz" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > > >Faster? No, not unless you have something misconfigured on your current

OS. XP can be about the > >same speed as long as you have it configured properly and have enoughcomputer to begin with, but I > >actually doubt anyone would say their performance increased anyappreciable amount by moving to XP. >

extractor @lycos.com wrote:

Quoted text (11 lines)

> Currently running Win ME, wonder if NR2003 might be faster (fps) under > XP > > Geforce Ti 4400 > P4 1.8 o/c 2.25 > 512 MB DDR RAM > SB Live 5.1 > 60 GB ATA 100 > Abit bd-7 > > Thanks exx

Been there, done that. Dual-boot, clean install win98 & XP and disabled unnecessary services in XP. Verdict: XP still slower by a couple of FPS. On my lowly T-Bird 900 MHz/GeForce2 rig, that is. Your mileage may vary. OTOH, Mr. S.

"extractor @lycos.com" wrote... > Currently running Win ME, wonder if NR2003 might > be faster (fps) under XP I get exactly the same fps Win98 --> XP. No difference whatsoever. Jan. =---