I took the New Hampshire race and ran it through my points deduction
scheme. Of the 22 incidents, only 2 were "one of them racin' deals".
the rest were over-aggressiveness, in-attention, or caused within two
laps of a restart.
HOWEVER...
Nobody earned enough penalty points (based on the replay) to warrant
a suspension, so the penalty point system may not be viable. The
following cars would have earned the indicated penalty points:
00 5
3 5
04 5
11 5
12 10
39 10
42 5
43 10
67 10
74 10
96 10
98 10
103 5
The race had 17 cautions for 59 laps.
Please point out my 10 points. That was a decent race for me...
-Larry
"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (28 lines)
> I took the New Hampshire race and ran it through my points deduction > scheme. Of the 22 incidents, only 2 were "one of them racin' deals". > the rest were over-aggressiveness, in-attention, or caused within two > laps of a restart. > > HOWEVER... > > Nobody earned enough penalty points (based on the replay) to warrant > a suspension, so the penalty point system may not be viable. The > following cars would have earned the indicated penalty points: > > 00 5 > 3 5 > 04 5 > 11 5 > 12 10 > 39 10 > 42 5 > 43 10 > 67 10 > 74 10 > 96 10 > 98 10 > 103 5 > > > The race had 17 cautions for 59 laps. >That wasn't the purpose of the test run. The purpose was to see if
the penalty points would result in a suspension, and the answer, even
for our most caution-filled race, is "no".
If you insist, I can post the reasons for your 10 points of
penalties, but I'm not going to entertain any further
discussion/argument beyond stating why you would have earned penalty
points. My advice is not to worry about it since the race is a
couple of weeks old now.
In article <JK9Za.11550$ug.9970@lakeread01>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted text (37 lines)
> Please point out my 10 points. That was a decent race for me... > > -Larry > > "John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > I took the New Hampshire race and ran it through my points deduction > > scheme. Of the 22 incidents, only 2 were "one of them racin' deals". > > the rest were over-aggressiveness, in-attention, or caused within two > > laps of a restart. > > > > HOWEVER... > > > > Nobody earned enough penalty points (based on the replay) to warrant > > a suspension, so the penalty point system may not be viable. The > > following cars would have earned the indicated penalty points: > > > > 00 5 > > 3 5 > > 04 5 > > 11 5 > > 12 10 > > 39 10 > > 42 5 > > 43 10 > > 67 10 > > 74 10 > > 96 10 > > 98 10 > > 103 5 > > > > > > The race had 17 cautions for 59 laps. > > > > >Never mind.
-Larry
"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
