Could the NR2003 patch situation get any worse? Only if they give up and
never finish it. Since June 27th 2003, the patch for NR2003 has been a
series of mistakes one after the other. The patch was needed and the
mods are a great idea, but the execution has been decidedly third rate.
I hope no one at Papy puts this on their resume.
"damn_it" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Could the NR2003 patch situation get any worse? Only if they give up and
> never finish it. Since June 27th 2003, the patch for NR2003 has been a
> series of mistakes one after the other. The patch was needed and the
> mods are a great idea, but the execution has been decidedly third rate.
> I hope no one at Papy puts this on their resume.
>
I'm interested: could you elaborate?
Alanb
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:08:39 GMT, damn_it <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>Could the NR2003 patch situation get any worse? Only if they give up and
>never finish it. Since June 27th 2003, the patch for NR2003 has been a
>series of mistakes one after the other. The patch was needed and the
>mods are a great idea, but the execution has been decidedly third rate.
>I hope no one at Papy puts this on their resume.
Has Papy/Sierra actually announced the patch as being released? A
bunch of people jump in and download a file that is unannounced and
then start bitching that unsurprisingly they can't play online with
it.
*sigh*
Andrew.
Mostly I would agree, but I don't know how much Papy had to do with it.
Mostly IMHO it has to do with people leaking it all over the place, not
papy.
"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:TNj_a.90881$cF.28802@rwcrnsc53...
Quoted text (15 lines)
> > "damn_it" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Could the NR2003 patch situation get any worse? Only if they give up and > > never finish it. Since June 27th 2003, the patch for NR2003 has been a > > series of mistakes one after the other. The patch was needed and the > > mods are a great idea, but the execution has been decidedly third rate. > > I hope no one at Papy puts this on their resume. > > > > I'm interested: could you elaborate? > > Alanb > >> Has Papy/Sierra actually announced the patch as being released? A
Yes, it was available for a brief period in the autoupdate system, but they
pulled it because there were issues with the "Race in Sierra.com" -button.
So much for the Sierra Q/A :D
--
Mika Takala
> bunch of people jump in and download a file that is unannounced and
> then start bitching that unsurprisingly they can't play online with
> it.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Andrew.
