Anyone remember how I wonderered about the strange 'flat-tire' understeer in
the patched N2k3 physics? It seems not to be present in the TransAm version
of the physics. Which I as an RC-only driver am very happy to notice. I'd
already been worried that with the patch they'd perhaps ruined the fun for
me.
Not sure how 'realistic' the TransAm physics are btw, but they're a lot more
fun that I'd expected them to be :-)
Achim
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:45:58 +0200, "Joachim Trensz" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>Anyone remember how I wonderered about the strange 'flat-tire' understeer in
>the patched N2k3 physics? It seems not to be present in the TransAm version
>of the physics. Which I as an RC-only driver am very happy to notice. I'd
>already been worried that with the patch they'd perhaps ruined the fun for
>me.
Oddly, I'm not noticing the pushiness anymore in the cup cars. I
dunno if it's because I adjusted my style or what, but I actually find
they handle much more convincingly after the patch. Then again, I've
been mostly driving T/A anyway...
>Not sure how 'realistic' the TransAm physics are btw, but they're a lot more
>fun that I'd expected them to be :-)
Welcome to the club, we've been wondering where you've been!
Jason
"jason moyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Oddly, I'm not noticing the pushiness anymore in the cup cars.
My impression is the same.
Marc
I concur less push with default setups. Now if I could only get online.
"Joachim Trensz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:3f4c7e5b$0$308$[email hidden]...
> Anyone remember how I wonderered about the strange 'flat-tire' understeerin
> the patched N2k3 physics? It seems not to be present in the TransAmversion
> of the physics. Which I as an RC-only driver am very happy to notice. I'd
> already been worried that with the patch they'd perhaps ruined the fun for
> me.
>
> Not sure how 'realistic' the TransAm physics are btw, but they're a lotmore
> fun that I'd expected them to be :-)
>
> Achim
>
>
