Hey ZZ - What Does it Mean?

I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the RASCAR forum. Just curious...

"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > RASCAR forum. Just curious... Then why don't you ask him? Why didn't you answer the post in the forum? Or email him? I'm curious to...... Jone

In article <bijdfs$a9to7$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted text (10 lines)

> > "John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > > RASCAR forum. Just curious... > > Then why don't you ask him? Why didn't you answer the post in the forum? Or > email him? > > I'm curious to......

1) Well, since I'm not a member of RASCAR any longer, it would be fairly inappropriate of me to ask him on the RASCAR forum. So, I asked here, ebcause I know he reads r.a.s., and lastly, because I don't have his email address. 2) ", too."

"John Simmons" said: > 1) Well, since I'm not a member of RASCAR any longer, it would be > fairly inappropriate of me to ask him on the RASCAR forum. Now, thats a pretty lousy excuse John.... Would you take one "readers-discussion" from one news-paper to the other? Or one TV-debate from one station to the other? You know damn well, just like the rest of us, that it would be perfectly okey for you to address this on the forum. Can't we just leave this be now - and move on... **All of us.** -- ed_ (*really *tired of this shit now)

>"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote > > In article <bijdfs$a9to7$[email hidden]>,[email hidden] says... > > I'm curious to...... > > 2) ", too." Well, perhaps it was intended as a rupture in his writing, as in "I'm curious to..... / .....know what it's all about" ;-P <snickers!> -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- http://ymenard.cjb.net/ -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...

"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > RASCAR forum. Just curious... It is quite OBVIOUSLY a statement on the way in which this place has been reduced to a pathetic childish mess due entirely to postings and angered ego's founded on RASCAR issues. Of course - you KNEW that - but you just wanted to try and kick off another flame war. Doug

"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (13 lines)

> I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > RASCAR forum. Just curious... >It is quite OBVIOUSLY a statement on the way in which this place has been >reduced to a pathetic childish mess due entirely to >postings and angered >ego's founded on RASCAR issues. >Of course - you KNEW that - but you just wanted to try >and kick off another >flame war. >Doug

---------------------------------------- Amazing. I was asked a simple question. I'll answer him in private to avoid the obvious. -- Richard "ZZ" Busch Member: Screamers Racing League OAO CORS RASCAR GPL Rank + 17.415 MoGPL Rank + 318.586 N2002 Rank + 7.695

In article <Ekc3b.679$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted text (12 lines)

> > "John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > > RASCAR forum. Just curious... > > It is quite OBVIOUSLY a statement on the way in which this place has been > reduced to a pathetic childish mess due entirely to postings and angered > ego's founded on RASCAR issues. > > Of course - you KNEW that - but you just wanted to try and kick off another > flame war.

No, I honestly don't know if he's serious or not. I didn't want to assume either way. Like I said - just curious.

"John Simmons" wrote: > I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > RASCAR forum. Just curious... The intent was as a tongue in cheek reminder of the original rationale of RASCAR as it developed in the early part of last year and how recent events had bought the name determined in the inaugral thread into disrepute. Having experienced the kids bitching on the open Sierra servers seeing Rascar going the same way is hard to stomach. ZZ & I have joked in the past how we were "responsible" for the name. If you guys aren't going to make proper use of it then we'll have it back thank you :) It is just a dig to say come on RAS lets all get Rascar back on track. With the Trans Am mod we could have some excellent road races to augment the Nascar oval events. It is not aimed at any individuals. At the time ZZ & I first discussed it Rascar was in complete disarray. It is not a stab at those trying to get it going again. Cheers Tony --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003

Tony Rickard wrote: > Right, so they can continue to use the RASCAR name if they allow you the right to have babies ? Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "goyl at nettx dot no" http://www.theuspits.com "A man is only as old as the woman he feels........" --Groucho Marx--

"Goy Larsen" wrote: > Right, so they can continue to use the RASCAR name if they allow you the > right to have babies ? I feel ashamed because it has been pointed out ZZ & I have discriminated against those that cannot pronounce Rs. So we wish to recall it and call it WASCAR. We plan to welease wascar shortly... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003

> > I feel ashamed because it has been pointed out ZZ & I have discriminated > against those that cannot pronounce Rs. So we wish to recall it and callit > WASCAR. We plan to welease wascar shortly... Careful now. This is getting seriously close to my patented GPL Wabbitt Wuns now <G> MS

Quoted text (10 lines)

> > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003 > >

"Tony Rickard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:rUr3b.6820$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> "Goy Larsen" wrote: > > > Right, so they can continue to use the RASCAR name if they allow you the > > right to have babies ? > > I feel ashamed because it has been pointed out ZZ & I have discriminated > against those that cannot pronounce Rs. So we wish to recall it and call

it > WASCAR. We plan to welease wascar shortly... ? "I'm Pawl Page, from Papaywus. This in Indtcaw Wacing Two" :D Doug

What about those who lisp? Achim "Tony Rickard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:rUr3b.6820$[email hidden]... ... > I feel ashamed because it has been pointed out ZZ & I have discriminated > against those that cannot pronounce Rs. So we wish to recall it and callit > WASCAR. We plan to welease wascar shortly...

In article <zFr3b.6802$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted text (24 lines)

> "John Simmons" wrote: > > > I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the > > RASCAR forum. Just curious... > > The intent was as a tongue in cheek reminder of the original rationale of > RASCAR as it developed in the early part of last year and how recent events > had bought the name determined in the inaugral thread into disrepute. > > Having experienced the kids bitching on the open Sierra servers seeing > Rascar going the same way is hard to stomach. > > ZZ & I have joked in the past how we were "responsible" for the name. If > you guys aren't going to make proper use of it then we'll have it back > thank you :) > > It is just a dig to say come on RAS lets all get Rascar back on track. > With the Trans Am mod we could have some excellent road races to augment > the Nascar oval events. > > It is not aimed at any individuals. At the time ZZ & I first discussed it > Rascar was in complete disarray. It is not a stab at those trying to get it > going again. >

Ahhhh, okay. :)

Goy penned: Right, so they can continue to use the RASCAR name if they allow you the right to have babies ? Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "goyl at nettx dot no" --------------------------------- Only if I can practice the act of making babies. And boy do I like to practice. ;-) -- Richard "ZZ" Busch Member: Screamers Racing League OAO CORS RASCAR GPL Rank + 17.415 MoGPL Rank + 318.586 N2002 Rank + 7.695

>> Goy penned: >> Right, so they can continue to use the RASCAR name if they allow you the >> right to have babies ? > Only if I can practice the act of making babies. And boy do I like to > practice. ;-) Been running those solo practice sessions ZZ? <G> --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:31:26 GMT, John Simmons <[email hidden]> wrote: >I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the >RASCAR forum. Just curious... 42 Jason

"ZZ Busch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Psu3b.41381$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> Goy penned: > Right, so they can continue to use the RASCAR name if they allow you the > right to have babies ? > > > Beers and cheers > (uncle) Goy > "goyl at nettx dot no" > --------------------------------- > > Only if I can practice the act of making babies. And boy do I like to > practice. ;-) > > -- > Richard "ZZ" Busch >

Yes, but we'll stiil have to be the judge of your abilities. Just step up and take this small rookie test. ;o) Elrikk

<g> People who actually read books (or watch ambitious movies) are recognised so easily sometimes :-) Achim "jason moyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... .... > 42....

jason moyer wrote:

Quoted text (8 lines)

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:31:26 GMT, John Simmons <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >>I don't understand the intent behind the notice you posted in the >>RASCAR forum. Just curious... > > > 42

Nope. "42" is obviously the answer to another question. Like "what is the Earl Grey tea blend number at Harrods ?". IMOH, it is extreeeemly improbable that "42" would also be the intent behind the aforementioned notice. Mr. Sylvestre.

In article <biljpk$ocn$[email hidden]>, "Mark Seery" <[email hidden]> writes: >Careful now. This is getting seriously close to my patented GPL Wabbitt >Wuns now <G> Wabbit Wuns? Do tell... Eldred -- "A voice from the crowd: Right, everyone out of my garden. I've had enough of this!" Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPLRank -2.4 N2k3 rank ? Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

"EldredP" wrote... > > <snip> > Wabbit Wuns? Do tell... It's a fun sort of idea if you got a couple of grudge matches to settle and a GPL server. Two driver teams. One, the wabbit, drives an F1 car. The other, the tortoise (for want of a better word... don't think we defined it at the time), drives an F3 car. The idea is for the F1 driver to win the race. No holds barred, but without getting into a real demolition derby. *Not* for the faint hearted, but then again, it's not my sort of game either. <g> Jan. =---

In article <VYR3b.7927$[email hidden]>, "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> writes:

Quoted text (14 lines)

>"EldredP" wrote... >> > <snip> >> Wabbit Wuns? Do tell... > >It's a fun sort of idea if you got a couple of grudge matches to settle and >a GPL server. > >Two driver teams. One, the wabbit, drives an F1 car. The other, the tortoise >(for want of a better word... don't think we defined it at the time), drives >an F3 car. The idea is for the F1 driver to win the race. No holds barred, >but without getting into a real demolition derby. > >*Not* for the faint hearted, but then again, it's not my sort of game >either. <g>

Wow - who came up with THAT concept? Eldred -- "A voice from the crowd: Right, everyone out of my garden. I've had enough of this!" Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPLRank -2.4 N2k3 rank ? Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

"EldredP" wrote... > > <snip> > Wow - who came up with THAT concept? Mark "The Hitman" Seery. Jan. =---