What kind of frames to you guys get here? I sometimes get 60fps, but then
when all those RASCAR posts come floating in, my frames drop to below 30.
I'm thinking of starting a petition to keep the frames here at 25.
What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time?
Alanb
Parody frame rate question mocks RASCAR traffic
Alan Bernardo parodied the frame rate threads by complaining that RASCAR posts dropped his newsgroup 'frame rate'. The replies turned into Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy jokes about 42. A brief exchange of insults between Biz and John Simmons ended the thread.
humourcommunity/meta
Automated summary.
"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:kZU3b.225577$cF.74410@rwcrnsc53...
Yes.
Elrikk
Quoted text (8 lines)
> What kind of frames to you guys get here? I sometimes get 60fps, but then > when all those RASCAR posts come floating in, my frames drop to below 30. > > I'm thinking of starting a petition to keep the frames here at 25. > > What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time? > > AlanbOn Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:36:49 GMT, "Alan Bernardo"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>What kind of frames to you guys get here?
42
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:36:49 GMT, "Alan Bernardo"
>What kind of frames to you guys get here?
42
Alan Bernardo wrote:
I'll sign any petition, me. If someone have gone to the trouble of
organizing one, then the least I can do is sign it. :)
--
Gerry Aitken
...and a friend shall lose a friend's hammer -- Book of Cyril, chapter
6, verse 16
Quoted text (10 lines)
> What kind of frames to you guys get here? I sometimes get 60fps, but then > when all those RASCAR posts come floating in, my frames drop to below 30. > > I'm thinking of starting a petition to keep the frames here at 25. > > What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time? > > Alanb > >"jason moyer" wrote
> >What kind of frames to you guys get here?
>
> 42
Yep, 7x7 here too...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
In article <BQ%3b.44$[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
7 x 6, goofball. :)
Quoted text (7 lines)
> "jason moyer" wrote > > > >What kind of frames to you guys get here? > > > > 42 > > Yep, 7x7 here too..."John Simmons" wrote:
Well I guess I wouldn't have expected deep thought to have reached your
part of the world John :)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
Quoted text (7 lines)
> > > >What kind of frames to you guys get here? > > > > > > 42 > > > > Yep, 7x7 here too... > > 7 x 6, goofball. :)In article <rE04b.79$[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
Well, I know what the 42 is for, but 7x7 is 49 which is not the
answer to everything. :)
However, it seems that I may have missed the intent of the 7x7
reference. Have pity on me and explain yourself. :)
Quoted text (13 lines)
> "John Simmons" wrote: > > > > > >What kind of frames to you guys get here? > > > > > > > > 42 > > > > > > Yep, 7x7 here too... > > > > 7 x 6, goofball. :) > > Well I guess I wouldn't have expected deep thought to have reached your > part of the world John :) >...and I thought your answer to everything usually is a string of randomly
chosen four-letter words? ;-) <bg,d&r>
Achim
"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
...
> Well, I know what the 42 is for, but 7x7 is 49 which is not the
> answer to everything. :)...
"John Simmons" wrote:
Some time ago a group of hyper-intelligent pan dimensional beings decided
to finally answer the great question of Life, The Universe and Everything.
To this end they built an incredibly powerful computer, Deep Thought. After
the great computer programme had run (a very quick seven and a half million
years) the answer was announced.
The Ultimate answer to Life, the Universe and Everything is...
(You're not going to like it...)
Is...
42
Which suggests that what you really need to know is 'What was the
Question?'.
The great computer kindly pointed out that what the problem really was that
no-one knew the question. Accordingly, the computer designed its successor,
the Earth, to find the question to the ultimate answer.
However, due to a slight Golgafrincham problem, and a small hooha with some
Vogons the program went a bit wrong. The whole problem remains just as
mysterious as it always has been, but a little more frustrating.
So now you know...
Cheers
Tony
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
Quoted text (16 lines)
> > > > > >What kind of frames to you guys get here? > > > > > > > > > > 42 > > > > > > > > Yep, 7x7 here too... > > > > > > 7 x 6, goofball. :) > > > > Well I guess I wouldn't have expected deep thought to have reached your > > part of the world John :) > > Well, I know what the 42 is for, but 7x7 is 49 which is not the > answer to everything. :) > > However, it seems that I may have missed the intent of the 7x7 > reference. Have pity on me and explain yourself. :)In article <biq8td$c43o6$[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
The composition of my answers is NEVER randomly chosen. Sometimes,
they may be *poorly* chosen (depending on who you ask), but they are
NEVER random.
:)
Quoted text (12 lines)
> ...and I thought your answer to everything usually is a string of randomly > chosen four-letter words? ;-) <bg,d&r> > > Achim > > > "John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > ... > > Well, I know what the 42 is for, but 7x7 is 49 which is not the > > answer to everything. :) > ...In article <%%14b.156$[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
Like I said, I know about 42. What I *don't* understand is the "7x7"
part of your original response. Did you mean to type "7x6" (which is
"42"), or is there some nefarious and as yet hidden meaning to "7x7"?
Quoted text (25 lines)
> "John Simmons" wrote: > > > > > > > >What kind of frames to you guys get here? > > > > > > > > > > > > 42 > > > > > > > > > > Yep, 7x7 here too... > > > > > > > > 7 x 6, goofball. :) > > > > > > Well I guess I wouldn't have expected deep thought to have reached your > > > part of the world John :) > > > > Well, I know what the 42 is for, but 7x7 is 49 which is not the > > answer to everything. :) > > > > However, it seems that I may have missed the intent of the 7x7 > > reference. Have pity on me and explain yourself. :) > > Some time ago a group of hyper-intelligent pan dimensional beings decided > > <snip>... > > So now you know... >"John Simmons" wrote:
> Like I said, I know about 42. What I *don't* understand is the "7x7"
> part of your original response. Did you mean to type "7x6" (which is
> "42"), or is there some nefarious and as yet hidden meaning to "7x7"?
Yes but what is the question to which the answer is 42?...
Remember that in discovering the question to the ultimate answer "due to a
slight Golgafrincham problem, and a small hooha with some Vogons the
program went a bit wrong"
My immediate recollection of the question (from the Hitchikers Guide for
those still wondering what the hell this is about) was 7x7. But on further
thought I think it may have been 9x6 - don't say 54 John :)
Anyway the important thing was that the computation of the ultimate
question didn't make 42 !!
There are many theories about why Douglas Adams chose 42 (e.g. 42 is 9x6 in
base 13) but D.A. simply chose it as a "nice" number.
Glad you asked, John?
Cheers
Tony
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
In article <pF24b.208$[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...
It's been YEARS since I read that book, so the only applicable answer
I can come up with is "aaaahhhhhh". I know - not as colorful as
usual, but it's the best I can do right now. :)
Quoted text (23 lines)
> "John Simmons" wrote: > > > Like I said, I know about 42. What I *don't* understand is the "7x7" > > part of your original response. Did you mean to type "7x6" (which is > > "42"), or is there some nefarious and as yet hidden meaning to "7x7"? > > Yes but what is the question to which the answer is 42?... > > Remember that in discovering the question to the ultimate answer "due to a > slight Golgafrincham problem, and a small hooha with some Vogons the > program went a bit wrong" > > My immediate recollection of the question (from the Hitchikers Guide for > those still wondering what the hell this is about) was 7x7. But on further > thought I think it may have been 9x6 - don't say 54 John :) > > Anyway the important thing was that the computation of the ultimate > question didn't make 42 !! > > There are many theories about why Douglas Adams chose 42 (e.g. 42 is 9x6 in > base 13) but D.A. simply chose it as a "nice" number. > > Glad you asked, John?Ok, then it's 'an artfully composed string' :)
Achim
"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
...
> The composition of my answers is NEVER randomly chosen. Sometimes,
> they may be *poorly* chosen (depending on who you ask), but they are
> NEVER random.
>
> :)
John Simmons wrote:
>
> It's been YEARS since I read that book, so the only applicable answer
> I can come up with is "aaaahhhhhh". I know - not as colorful as
> usual, but it's the best I can do right now. :)
Since redTed hasn't chimed in yet, I'll do it for him and say; that
answer is way above the stuff you usually come up with
Oh yeah, and add some school yard insults and you're all set
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:25:21 GMT, "Tony Rickard"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
You mean 6x9?
Jason
Quoted text (7 lines)
>"jason moyer" wrote > >> >What kind of frames to you guys get here? >> >> 42 > >Yep, 7x7 here too...
"jason moyer" wrote:
>
> >Yep, 7x7 here too...
>
> You mean 6x9?
Yeh, see my other posts on this thread...
I was an adding a degree of mystique - but the 6x9 would have been subtle
enough in hindsight :)
Cheers
Tony
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
It was fine when they included RASCAR in the subject so I could filter out their crap, but now they
just post whatever to vent their moronic ramblings I cant lock on anything decent to filter out
their drivel...
--
Biz
"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash
"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:kZU3b.225577$cF.74410@rwcrnsc53...
> What kind of frames to you guys get here? I sometimes get 60fps, but then
> when all those RASCAR posts come floating in, my frames drop to below 30.
>
> I'm thinking of starting a petition to keep the frames here at 25.
>
> What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time?
>
> Alanb
>
>
"Goy Larsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
I would have, but I think I'm still blacklisted ;)
Quoted text (13 lines)
> > > John Simmons wrote: > > > > It's been YEARS since I read that book, so the only applicable answer > > I can come up with is "aaaahhhhhh". I know - not as colorful as > > usual, but it's the best I can do right now. :) > > Since redTed hasn't chimed in yet, I'll do it for him and say; that > answer is way above the stuff you usually come up with > > Oh yeah, and add some school yard insults and you're all set >>"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote
> What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time?
RASCAR is no GPL!
:-|
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- http://ymenard.cjb.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
"FOCK you asshoole!"
T-1000
In article <vo54b.121531$3o3.8517920@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted text (25 lines)
> It was fine when they included RASCAR in the subject so I could filter out their crap, but now they > just post whatever to vent their moronic ramblings I cant lock on anything decent to filter out > their drivel... > -- > Biz > > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and > the....." - Ash > > > "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:kZU3b.225577$cF.74410@rwcrnsc53... > > What kind of frames to you guys get here? I sometimes get 60fps, but then > > when all those RASCAR posts come floating in, my frames drop to below 30. > > > > I'm thinking of starting a petition to keep the frames here at 25. > > > > What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time? > > > > Alanb > > > > > > >Just the response I expected from a dimwit like you. Glad I got out of your RACRAP early on when I
saw what a POS it was turning into with you and your comrades running into the ground.
--
Biz
"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash
"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
> "FOCK you asshoole!"
>
> T-1000
>
>
>
> In article <vo54b.121531$3o3.8517920@bgtnsc05-
> news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, [email hidden] says...
> > It was fine when they included RASCAR in the subject so I could filter out their crap, but now
they
> > just post whatever to vent their moronic ramblings I cant lock on anything decent to filter out
> > their drivel...
> > --
> > Biz
> >
> > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
> > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
> > the....." - Ash
> >
> >
> > "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:kZU3b.225577$cF.74410@rwcrnsc53...
> > > What kind of frames to you guys get here? I sometimes get 60fps, but then
> > > when all those RASCAR posts come floating in, my frames drop to below 30.
> > >
> > > I'm thinking of starting a petition to keep the frames here at 25.
> > >
> > > What does everyone think? Am I wasting my time?
> > >
> > > Alanb
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
In article <wY84b.120112$0v4.8633114@bgtnsc04-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, [email hidden] says...
> Just the response I expected from a dimwit like you. Glad I got out of your RACRAP early on when I
> saw what a POS it was turning into with you and your comrades running into the ground.
Oh, that really hurts.
I'm wounded - really.
I don't know how I'll ever be able to go on.
What's your sierra ID again? I don't remember a "biz" in the league.
Maybe you were just tired of being a back-marker.
In article <biq8td$c43o6$[email hidden]>, "Joachim Trensz"
<[email hidden]> writes:
I *doubt* that it's random...<g>
Eldred
--
"A voice from the crowd: Right, everyone out of my garden. I've had
enough of this!"
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank -2.4
N2k3 rank ?
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.


































