Kali and GP3

any tried that yet? Martyn_D

any tried that yet? Martyn_D

cuz of this line in the readme 3. TCP/IP play over the internet via analog modems is not currently supported due to the low transfer rates. Martyn_D Jan Loebzien wrote:

Quoted text (7 lines)

> On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:46:04 GMT, SKurj <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >any tried that yet? > > Why should one? GP3 supports TCP, no need for IPX tunneling. > > Blaze

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:46:04 GMT, SKurj <[email hidden]> wrote: >any tried that yet? Why should one? GP3 supports TCP, no need for IPX tunneling. Blaze

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 23:05:20 GMT, SKurj <[email hidden]> wrote: >cuz of this line in the readme > >3. TCP/IP play over the internet via analog modems is not currently >supported >due to the low transfer rates. And what makes you think that the use of Kali would change that? The amount of data that has to be transfered is the same with IPX as with TCP, and by tunneling IPX via TCP (like Kali does) you most likely even add some overhead. Just wait for reports on how it plays with TCP via the Internet. Remember, DSL and cable are _not_ "analog modems". :-) Blaze

Jan Loebzien <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (15 lines)

>On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 23:05:20 GMT, SKurj <[email hidden]> wrote: > >>cuz of this line in the readme >> >>3. TCP/IP play over the internet via analog modems is not currently >>supported >>due to the low transfer rates. > >And what makes you think that the use of Kali would change that? >The amount of data that has to be transfered is the same with IPX >as with TCP, and by tunneling IPX via TCP (like Kali does) you most >likely even add some overhead. > >Just wait for reports on how it plays with TCP via the Internet. >Remember, DSL and cable are _not_ "analog modems". :-)

And LANs do not have 5 routers (internally) JoH ------- The best way to accelerate a Mac is 9.81 m/s2 -------- --------------------------------------------------------------