WIll F1 2000 run better with a Geforce?
Rene
GeForce2 versus Voodoo 5 for racing sims
Asked whether F1 2000 runs better on a GeForce, posters reported only small gains over Voodoo cards. Nos returned his GeForce2 for a Voodoo 5 because of menu corruption with FSAA, while others cited 3DMark scores in nVidia's favour and Nos dismissed such benchmarks as irrelevant to games. The exchange became testy, with some insults.
hardware: PC/graphicsF1 2000
Automated summary.
WIll F1 2000 run better with a Geforce?
Rene
When I temporarily substituted a Creative Labs GeForce2 for my Voodoo
3000 in my P3 550, I found only a 2 or 3 frame-per-second increase. In
some spots of the track (Nurburgring) with higher levels of detail, it
was actually about 1 fps slower. Other folks in this newsgroup have
pointed out that racing sims tend to be CPU-limited, rather than
video-card-limited.
As always, your mileage may vary...
...Klinn
DOK wrote:
> WIll F1 2000 run better with a Geforce?
> Rene
"DOK" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> WIll F1 2000 run better with a Geforce?
Actually I think it will run better with a V5 5500. Of for no other
reason than the menus will not be porked :-)
--
[email hidden]
[email hidden] wrote:
You must have tried it at least 6 minutes, then... ;-)
JoH
------- The best way to accelerate a Mac is 9.81 m/s2 --------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted text (12 lines)
>On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:35:46 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> >thus spoke: > > >>Actually I think it will run better with a V5 5500. Of for no other >>reason than the menus will not be porked :-) > >Yep, my Geforce2 is going back as soon as the store gets in a Voodoo5 >for exactly that reason. Same problem with SCGT too. If you want FSAA >then forget the Geforce2. I kind of knew that when I bought a Gef2, >but had to see it for myself. Now that I have tried one I am fully >qualified to call it a piece of crap. :-)On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:35:46 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]>
thus spoke:
>Actually I think it will run better with a V5 5500. Of for no other
>reason than the menus will not be porked :-)
Yep, my Geforce2 is going back as soon as the store gets in a Voodoo5
for exactly that reason. Same problem with SCGT too. If you want FSAA
then forget the Geforce2. I kind of knew that when I bought a Gef2,
but had to see it for myself. Now that I have tried one I am fully
qualified to call it a piece of crap. :-)
--
Nos
thus spoke:
Yep, my Geforce2 is going back as soon as the store gets in a Voodoo5
for exactly that reason. Same problem with SCGT too. If you want FSAA
then forget the Geforce2. I kind of knew that when I bought a Gef2,
but had to see it for myself. Now that I have tried one I am fully
qualified to call it a piece of crap. :-)
--
Nos
The Voodoo5 5500 really cannot tip the performance of a GeForce2 GTS.
Just read the V5 5500 review at http://www.thetechzone.com/
This guy runs a 3dmark2000 benchmark test on his 825 mhz computer with
Voodoo5, he only scores 4200 points whille I with a slightly slower cpu
(800) but with GeForce 2 GTS score 6388 points.
I just swapped my old Voodoo3 with a GeForce 2 GTS. The voodoo3 used to give
me around 3500 points in 3dmark2000.
It's quite clear that the GeForce 2 is the fastest and best card around atm.
3Dfx is only playing catching up...
Quoted text (13 lines)
> thus spoke: > >Actually I think it will run better with a V5 5500. Of for no other > >reason than the menus will not be porked :-) > Yep, my Geforce2 is going back as soon as the store gets in a Voodoo5 > for exactly that reason. Same problem with SCGT too. If you want FSAA > then forget the Geforce2. I kind of knew that when I bought a Gef2, > but had to see it for myself. Now that I have tried one I am fully > qualified to call it a piece of crap. :-) > -- > NosYep. I have been doing autosims longer than flight sims :-)
Noted. FSAA is ***on the GF2 cards.
--
Frankly I agree with nos about the benchmark stuff. How about loading
up F1 2000 with fraps and let us know what you get for framerates.
That would be a meaningful number. Then please compare with
a V5 or V3. I suspect you will not see much of a difference if any at all.
And those are the important numbers.
--
Quoted text (9 lines)
> thus spoke: > >So why should I upgrade? Oh wait... Because I want to*** > >around with immature drivers that don't work worth a darn :-) > That's always worth upgrading for. But, 2X FSAA on a V5 will be usable > in any game because it comes with a negligible performance hit. But, > if you really want to improve the frame rate in sims then a faster cpu > is the what you should buy.Quoted text (11 lines)
> On Sat, 01 Jul 2000 21:04:38 +0100, Weaver > >I haven't had one problem with any set of drivers when not using > >FSAA. That's since last November. All sets have been excellent, > >and worked first time. > Sure Peter. I have only had the Geforce2 for two weeks and have > already gone through four sets of drivers and can name a number of > bugs in games/progs. But, I will let you find out what they are for > yourself.<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
From what I have been reading, FSAA is only really good for older
games as it supposedly has a huge performance hit. So with newer
games that need the fastest CPU just on general principals, FSAA
is not supposed to help as it would kill framerate.
I am also not convinced that the V5-5500 will vastly improve the
framerate in F1 20000, SCGT, N3, EAW, F4, Freespace2 and
anyother game I might have forgotten. If it boosted my F12K
framerate from 20 to 30 or 35 in a Grandprix with a full field then
I would certainly be interested. Also if it would boost the framerate
in F4's campaign (1024x768) from 25 to *MUCH* higher I would
also be interested. I am not sure my 12 MB Voodoo2 and my
old trusty 16MB TNT is worth replacing at this point. All of my
games are running at a great framerate.
So why should I upgrade? Oh wait... Because I want to screw
around with immature drivers that don't work worth a darn :-)
--
[email hidden]
Quoted text (12 lines)
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:35:46 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> > thus spoke: > > > >Actually I think it will run better with a V5 5500. Of for no other > >reason than the menus will not be porked :-) > > Yep, my Geforce2 is going back as soon as the store gets in a Voodoo5 > for exactly that reason. Same problem with SCGT too. If you want FSAA > then forget the Geforce2. I kind of knew that when I bought a Gef2, > but had to see it for myself. Now that I have tried one I am fully > qualified to call it a piece of crap. :-)Quoted text (14 lines)
> From what I have been reading, FSAA is only really good for older > games as it supposedly has a huge performance hit. So with newer > games that need the fastest CPU just on general principals, FSAA > is not supposed to help as it would kill framerate. > > I am also not convinced that the V5-5500 will vastly improve the > framerate in F1 20000, SCGT, N3, EAW, F4, Freespace2 and > anyother game I might have forgotten. If it boosted my F12K > framerate from 20 to 30 or 35 in a Grandprix with a full field then > I would certainly be interested. Also if it would boost the framerate > in F4's campaign (1024x768) from 25 to *MUCH* higher I would > also be interested. I am not sure my 12 MB Voodoo2 and my > old trusty 16MB TNT is worth replacing at this point. All of my > games are running at a great framerate.
"Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:ZjO75.14747$[email hidden]...
I suppose you *could* take it that way if you wanted. hehe
I've just put my trusty old V2s in the box with this GF256. I can't bring
myself to bite on either 3dfx's or Nvidia's latest offerings, so I suppose
I'll just suffer without the FSAA for the time being and see what develops
in, oh, say the next six weeks or so--bound to be another "latest big thing"
out by then. :)
Jerry Morelock
Quoted text (8 lines)
> "chainbreaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:#BlKqTD5$GA.282@cpmsnbbsa09... > > Spend enough time with an Nvidia card, and changing drivers becomes a > piece > > of cake--doesn't take much time at all. I know. > > Well OK another endorsement for Nvidia :-) >On Sat, 01 Jul 2000 16:01:56 +0200, Jo Helsen
Hehe...nope, unlike that "crap" game, I have actually had the Geforce2
in my machine for two weeks.
--
Nos
thus spoke:
That's always worth upgrading for. But, 2X FSAA on a V5 will be usable
in any game because it comes with a negligible performance hit. But,
if you really want to improve the frame rate in sims then a faster cpu
is the what you should buy.
--
Nos
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:00:45 +0100, "Paul Brogden"
.
>800x600 - give me higher res over AA any day.
Depends on what cpu. The V5 scales with the cpu very well. On a P3 800
you really cared about frame rates you wouldn't run your games at that
res anyway.
--
Nos
On Sat, 01 Jul 2000 21:04:38 +0100, Weaver
Sure Peter. I have only had the Geforce2 for two weeks and have
already gone through four sets of drivers and can name a number of
bugs in games/progs. But, I will let you find out what they are for
yourself.
--
Nos
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:06:03 +0200, "Sjon Stigter"
Oh geez..another benchmark wuss. Those 3D Marks mean*** all to real
world performance because they take advantage of the T&L processor on
the Geforce2. How many games do you own right now that use T&L. As I
thought...none.
--
Nos
thus spoke:
I believe 3DMark is his favourite game. Right Peter? :-)
--
Nos
3dmark2000 uses T&L, hence the big step. In real life *** though I find
3dmark less than useful... easy benchmark to use though.
Andrew McP
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:48:48 -0400, "chainbreaker"
Yep, I went through four sets of drivers in two weeks with the
Geforce2. Just exchanged it today for a V5 5500 though so that malarky
is over and done with. Now to go play SCGT with FSAA that doesn't pork
the menus.
--
Nos
On Sun, 02 Jul 2000 16:16:17 +0100, Weaver
Yep, I know that. The menus show graphics glitches in WWIIF with FSAA
or not. Opera's windows are screwed up if you maximize them, just like
Free Agent is on the Geforce2 card. This may be specific to the
Creative drivers though. But, it pissed me off enough to go back to my
beloved 3DFX.
--
Nos
Quoted text (8 lines)
> >Frankly I agree with nos about the benchmark stuff. > No surprises there, then :) > >How about loading up F1 2000 with fraps and let us know what > >you get for framerates.That would be a meaningful number. > Good idea. Name your set of parameters for a static test.Well OK another endor***t for Nvidia :-)
--
Quoted text (10 lines)
> >On Sat, 01 Jul 2000 21:04:38 +0100, Weaver > >>I haven't had one problem with any set of drivers when not using > >>FSAA. That's since last November. All sets have been excellent, > >>and worked first time. > >Sure Peter. > When you say sure - do you mean that you don't believe me?Quoted text (9 lines)
> >> I haven't had one problem with any set of drivers when not using > >> FSAA. That's since last November. All sets have been excellent, > >> and worked first time. > >Noted. FSAA is ***on the GF2 cards. > Oh - when did you get yours? (Usual trick question <g>) > "The Voice of Experience" - of browsing webpages <VBG>> > Spend enough time with an Nvidia card, and changing drivers becomes a
> piece
> > of cake--doesn't take much time at all. I know.
> Well OK another endor***t for Nvidia :-)
I suppose you *could* take it that way if you wanted. hehe
I've just put my trusty old V2s in the box with this GF256. I can't bring
myself to bite on either 3dfx's or Nvidia's latest offerings, so I suppose
I'll just suffer without the FSAA for the time being and see what develops
in, oh, say the next six weeks or so--bound to be another "latest big thing"
out by then. :)
Jerry Morelock
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000 01:32:23 +0100, Weaver
<[email hidden]> thus spoke:
>I'll take that as a "No" then. You failed the test. Didn't you see the
>"trick question!" sign up there?
Everything you post is a trick question. Crafty sod. :-)
--
Nos
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000 01:32:23 +0100, Weaver
Everything you post is a trick question. Crafty sod. :-)
--
Nos
A Voodoo 5 for a GeForce 2? You must be joking. Keep the Geforce2 the
Voodoo is going under as the company stock is dropping drastically. They
will be history soon if the trend continues.
[email hidden] wrote:
Quoted text (14 lines)
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:35:46 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> > thus spoke: > > >Actually I think it will run better with a V5 5500. Of for no other > >reason than the menus will not be porked :-) > > Yep, my Geforce2 is going back as soon as the store gets in a Voodoo5 > for exactly that reason. Same problem with SCGT too. If you want FSAA > then forget the Geforce2. I kind of knew that when I bought a Gef2, > but had to see it for myself. Now that I have tried one I am fully > qualified to call it a piece of crap. :-) > > -- > NosOn Tue, 04 Jul 2000 01:01:41 GMT, Mrv <[email hidden]> thus
spoke:
>A Voodoo 5 for a GeForce 2? You must be joking. Keep the Geforce2 the
>Voodoo is going under as the company stock is dropping drastically. They
>will be history soon if the trend continues.
You looking for a video card or a stock option?
--
Nos
spoke:
You looking for a video card or a stock option?
--
Nos
Mrv wrote:
>
> A Voodoo 5 for a GeForce 2? You must be joking. Keep the Geforce2 the
> Voodoo is going under as the company stock is dropping drastically. They
> will be history soon if the trend continues.
LOL, you keep playing with your stocks, I'll enjoy my sims in FSAA glory.
l8er
ronny
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!


































