Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

13 posts by 6 people · 10 Feb 2000 - 14 Feb 2000

Darko Juvan 10 Feb 2000#518867
Hi all, Recently, I installed PDPI L4. I have TSW (50 ohm SPEC pots). No jittering, spiking - it's rock solid, BUT it's not as smooth as TSW+SB Live. My virtual wheel in GPL moves in discrete increments, not smoothly, very hard to control when you have setting to full linear. Specially hard to control close to wheel neutral position. By the way, I calibrated TSW without problem and also I set dead zone to 0 using CTFJ!. Didn't help. It's hard for me to believe that TSW+PDPI cannot better TSW+SB Live in smoothness. So my questions are. 1. Is that matter of fine tuning in PDPI Default/FineTuneInfo registry settings. Currently I have "FineTuneInfo"=hex:3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00 (exported from my registry). Can anybody who have smooth respond with TSW(SPEC pots) and PDPI send me a FineTuneInfo settings? 2. Is there anything else I can do to solve my problem. Like special registry settings, magic calibration... Otherwise I'll be forced to go back to SB Live gameport which gives me little jittering but allow me smooth control with generic Papy driver and steering set to full linear. I really hope that I'm doing something wrong and PDPI is rock solid and smooth, as so many people in this news group said it is. I'll highly appreciate any help or suggestion? Thank you in advance. Darko
bph.. 10 Feb 2000#518868
I have a tsw2 with spec steering pot and pdpi. Steering moves smoothly in gpl, NO increments. I have the switch on the pdpi set to digital. I have done no special calib or tweaking. My default fine tune reg entries are the same as yours. I also have a sb live. I'm using dx 6.1. Maybe Thomas or pdpi can help you. > Hi all, > Recently, I installed PDPI L4. I have TSW (50 ohm SPEC pots). No jittering, > spiking - it's rock solid, BUT it's not as smooth as TSW+SB Live. My virtual > wheel in GPL moves in discrete increments, not smoothly, very hard to > control when you have setting to full linear. Specially hard to control > close to wheel neutral position. By the way, I calibrated TSW without > problem and also I set dead zone to 0 using CTFJ!. Didn't help. It's hard > for me to believe that TSW+PDPI cannot better TSW+SB Live in smoothness. So > my questions are. > 1. Is that matter of fine tuning in PDPI Default/FineTuneInfo registry
Quoted text (10 lines)> settings. Currently I have > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00 > (exported from my registry). Can anybody who have smooth respond with > TSW(SPEC pots) and PDPI send me a FineTuneInfo settings? > 2. Is there anything else I can do to solve my problem. Like special > registry settings, magic calibration... > Otherwise I'll be forced to go back to SB Live gameport which gives me > little jittering but allow me smooth control with generic Papy driver
and > steering set to full linear. > I really hope that I'm doing something wrong and PDPI is rock solid and > smooth, as so many people in this news group said it is. > I'll highly appreciate any help or suggestion? Thank you in advance. > Darko Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of the PDPI FineTune section. First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the same name as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a look at the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and content). You now have a register setting that you can experiment with Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for 50 k. I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k pots. If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values: "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00". You're only using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important... You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to adjust the finetune register so that you get as big range as possible. One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change the values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up windows. If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of experience in this. :-) ---Asgeir---
Shumi 10 Feb 2000#518870
Thanks Asgeir, He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same thing :) It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" of the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never reaches 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts to start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending on the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact... EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels). Cheers, Shumi P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers except that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...
Darko Juvan 10 Feb 2000#518871
Thanks guys. I just change from 0x3b->0x20 in FineTuneInfo, and that made HUGE difference. It's just the best experience in GPL I ever have. Rock solid and smooth. This little tweak made wonder. Shumi you should put this info on PDPI site/documentation, or at least in Readme file. Now TSW+PDPI really look like ultimate combination for GPL, but just with a right FineTuneInfo settings. Once again, thank you very much for your response. Darko > Thanks Asgeir, > He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same thing > :) > It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" of > the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never reaches > 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts to > start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending on
Quoted text (21 lines)> the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact... > EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd > be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels). > Cheers, > Shumi > P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase > performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers except > that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K > Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them... > > I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of the > PDPI > > FineTune section. > > First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the
same
Quoted text (11 lines)> name > > as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a > look at > > the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and > content). > > You now have a register setting that you can experiment with > > Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for 50 > k. > > I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k
pots. > > If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values: > > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00". > You're only > > using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important... > > You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to adjust
Quoted text (10 lines)> the > > finetune register so that you get as big range as possible. > > One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change the > > values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up windows. > > If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of > > experience in this. :-) > > ---Asgeir---
Shumi 11 Feb 2000#519053
I have made note of the settings you gentlemen are experiencing favorable results with, and the new version of the drivers will include a readme.txt for uncommon pots (although they should be more commonly used). Keep your eyes peeled for our Win2K drivers coming soon :) 20K = 10 50K = 18 Cheers, Shumi
Quoted text (24 lines)> Thanks guys. I just change from 0x3b->0x20 in FineTuneInfo, and that made > HUGE difference. It's just the best experience in GPL I ever have. Rock > solid and smooth. This little tweak made wonder. Shumi you should put this > info on PDPI site/documentation, or at least in Readme file. Now TSW+PDPI > really look like ultimate combination for GPL, but just with a right > FineTuneInfo settings. Once again, thank you very much for your response. > Darko > > Thanks Asgeir, > > He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same > thing > > :) > > It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" > of > > the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never > reaches > > 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts
to > > start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending > on > > the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact... > > EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd
Quoted text (8 lines)> > be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels). > > Cheers, > > Shumi > > P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase > > performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers
except
Quoted text (7 lines)> > that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K > > Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them... > > > I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of
the
Quoted text (13 lines)> > PDPI > > > FineTune section. > > > First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the > same > > name > > > as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a > > look at > > > the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and > > content). > > > You now have a register setting that you can experiment with > > > Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for
50
Quoted text (16 lines)> > k. > > > I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k > pots. > > > If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values: > > > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00". > > You're only > > > using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important... > > > You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to > adjust > > the > > > finetune register so that you get as big range as possible. > > > One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change
the > > > values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up windows. > > > If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of > > > experience in this. :-) > > > ---Asgeir---
Kenny L. 11 Feb 2000#519054
I've owned a PDPI L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo deal you're speaking of. Where is that? What did I miss? -- Kenny L. kenny_l AT pacbell DOT net > I have made note of the settings you gentlemen are experiencing favorable > results with, and the new version of the drivers will include a readme.txt > for uncommon pots (although they should be more commonly used). Keep your > eyes peeled for our Win2K drivers coming soon :) > 20K = 10 > 50K = 18 > Cheers, > Shumi > > Thanks guys. I just change from 0x3b->0x20 in FineTuneInfo, and that made > > HUGE difference. It's just the best experience in GPL I ever have. Rock > > solid and smooth. This little tweak made wonder. Shumi you should put this > > info on PDPI site/documentation, or at least in Readme file. Now TSW+PDPI > > really look like ultimate combination for GPL, but just with a right > > FineTuneInfo settings. Once again, thank you very much for your response. > > Darko > > > Thanks Asgeir, > > > He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same > > thing > > > :) > > > It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" > > of > > > the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never > > reaches > > > 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts > to > > > start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending > > on > > > the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact... > > > EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units > (you'd > > > be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels). > > > Cheers, > > > Shumi > > > P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase > > > performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers > except > > > that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K > > > Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them... > > > > I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of > the > > > PDPI > > > > FineTune section. > > > > First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the > > same > > > name > > > > as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a > > > look at > > > > the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and > > > content). > > > > You now have a register setting that you can experiment with > > > > Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for > 50 > > > k. > > > > I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k > > pots. > > > > If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values: > > > > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00". > > > You're only > > > > using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important... > > > > You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to > > adjust > > > the > > > > finetune register so that you get as big range as possible. > > > > One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change > the > > > > values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up > windows. > > > > If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of > > > > experience in this. :-) > > > > ---Asgeir---
Kenny L. 11 Feb 2000#519055
Ok, I found that reg entry. Now, a new question. Is there a setting which would make a Thrustmaster NASCAR pro wheel smoother? I have not been able to use the Papy joystick driver since I installed the PDPI L4, my inputs are way too clunky. The Dx driver does seem to work well enough, though. But, I do remember the Papy driver beeing much more precise. TIA -- Kenny L. kenny_l AT pacbell DOT net > Hi all, > Recently, I installed PDPI L4. I have TSW (50 ohm SPEC pots). No jittering, > spiking - it's rock solid, BUT it's not as smooth as TSW+SB Live. My virtual > wheel in GPL moves in discrete increments, not smoothly, very hard to > control when you have setting to full linear. Specially hard to control > close to wheel neutral position. By the way, I calibrated TSW without > problem and also I set dead zone to 0 using CTFJ!. Didn't help. It's hard > for me to believe that TSW+PDPI cannot better TSW+SB Live in smoothness. So > my questions are. > 1. Is that matter of fine tuning in PDPI Default/FineTuneInfo registry > settings. Currently I have > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00 > (exported from my registry). Can anybody who have smooth respond with > TSW(SPEC pots) and PDPI send me a FineTuneInfo settings? > 2. Is there anything else I can do to solve my problem. Like special > registry settings, magic calibration... > Otherwise I'll be forced to go back to SB Live gameport which gives me > little jittering but allow me smooth control with generic Papy driver and > steering set to full linear. > I really hope that I'm doing something wrong and PDPI is rock solid and > smooth, as so many people in this news group said it is. > I'll highly appreciate any help or suggestion? Thank you in advance. > Darko
You need to use the DirectInput... Because The PDIP doesn't do anything to the signals if you use Generic... And you don't benefit from the diminished load on the CPU either... The DirectInput (using the PDPI joystick driver) reports a number from 0 to 255 (8 bit resolution), and although displaying a lower number, it is as stable and accurate as can be... 255 possible wheel positions are more than you'll ever need... ---Asgeir---
Quoted text (13 lines)> Ok, I found that reg entry. Now, a new question. Is there a setting which > would make > a Thrustmaster NASCAR pro wheel smoother? I have not been able to use the > Papy > joystick driver since I installed the PDPI L4, my inputs are way too clunky. > The Dx driver > does seem to work well enough, though. But, I do remember the Papy driver > beeing > much more precise. > TIA > -- > Kenny L. > kenny_l AT pacbell DOT net
If your rig works ok, and the ranges count around 200, you don't have to worry about anything. It is when you don't get a large range with your pots that you need to tamper with the register. ---Asgeir---
Quoted text (7 lines)> I've owned a PDPI L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo > deal you're > speaking of. Where is that? What did I miss? > -- > Kenny L. > kenny_l AT pacbell DOT net
Yes, this is very important simply because we would like to have as large as possible range of the input. If your pot gives 0 ohm at zero movement, you can tune the register so that you'll get 255 different values. The PDPI is a joy to set up with a nonstandard racing rig (like my own)... :-) With PDPI and three supreme quality pots (you know, those capable of 10 mill revs), you never need to worry about calibrating again... :-))) ---Asgeir---
Quoted text (21 lines)> Thanks Asgeir, > He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same thing > :) > It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" of > the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never reaches > 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts to > start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending on > the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact... > EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd > be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels). > Cheers, > Shumi > P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase > performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers except > that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K > Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...
Darko Juvan 11 Feb 2000#519059
What do you mean with "ranges count around 200"? Give example settings for 50 ohm and 100 ohm pots to be in range of 200. I found that 18 (hex) is smooth for 50 ohm pots. Is that in the range? Darko > If your rig works ok, and the ranges count around 200, you don't have to worry > about anything. It is when you don't get a large range with your pots that you
Quoted text (14 lines)> need to tamper with the register. > ---Asgeir--- > > I've owned a PDPI L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo > > deal you're > > speaking of. Where is that? What did I miss? > > -- > > Kenny L. > > kenny_l AT pacbell DOT net
I am talking about the range you get when you calibrate the thing in GPL... The range is the biggest value subtracted by the smallest value. That is why getting the smallest value at the "unactivated" position is important: You can tune the register so that you get as close as you want to the 255 different values... I think that for the pedals you need at least a range of 80-100. I have made my own pedals, and the brake pedal has very little movement, and a subtle change of pressure at the near bottom position should cause an accurate change of input value. So, I have tuned the register so that I get a big range (200) to ensure accuracy for even the smallest changes, especially at around the threshold pedal pressure (Hehe, my brake pedal needs a heavier foot than my real life car!)... The throttle needs less range, I'd say that you can't feel any difference between a range of 50 and 100... The steering needs as much accuracy as you can get, I would say that it should use 200 - 250 or so to get as accurate steering as possible. ---Asgeir---
Quoted text (27 lines)> What do you mean with "ranges count around 200"? Give example settings for > 50 ohm and 100 ohm pots to be in range of 200. I found that 18 (hex) is > smooth for 50 ohm pots. Is that in the range? > Darko > > If your rig works ok, and the ranges count around 200, you don't have to > worry > > about anything. It is when you don't get a large range with your pots that > you > > need to tamper with the register. > > ---Asgeir--- > > > I've owned a PDPI L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo > > > deal you're > > > speaking of. Where is that? What did I miss? > > > -- > > > Kenny L. > > > kenny_l AT pacbell DOT net

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy