I've noticed that the same questions come up regularly
about FF wheels. Eg.
- Build Quality
- CPU usage
- Pedals
- Ease of use
- Longevity
- Quality of programming of effects.
Wouldn't it be worth compiling a FAQ web page for this
that could be refered to consistently? This FAQ would
be more in depth than a review and survive long enough
for an objective opinion to emerge.
This would be especially
useful as FF wheels still appear to be a bit of an
(expensive) gimmick.
I'm not volunteering here though - I would be ineligable
as editor on the basis that I still use a TM Sprint.
--
Steve
Check out this site: http://www.force-1.com/
don
[|]-(_)-[|]
Quoted text (23 lines)
>I've noticed that the same questions come up regularly >about FF wheels. Eg. >- Build Quality >- CPU usage >- Pedals >- Ease of use >- Longevity >- Quality of programming of effects. >Wouldn't it be worth compiling a FAQ web page for this >that could be refered to consistently? This FAQ would >be more in depth than a review and survive long enough >for an objective opinion to emerge. >This would be especially >useful as FF wheels still appear to be a bit of an >(expensive) gimmick. >I'm not volunteering here though - I would be ineligable >as editor on the basis that I still use a TM Sprint. >-- >SteveForce-1 is nice,but it is so uncelar and confused regarding the FF
API's ,what brands have what API's and what tools to use for
which prducts in order to tune the forces.
--
Robert S?derberg
If replying by mail,remove the word INGENSPAM from the adress.
> Check out this site: http://www.force-1.com/
> don
> [|]-(_)-[|]
> >I've noticed that the same questions come up regularly
> >about FF wheels. Eg.
> >Wouldn't it be worth compiling a FAQ web page for this
> >that could be refered to consistently? This FAQ would
