I finally made my choice for the best nacar game.
I tried : 1) Nascar 3
2) Nascar revolution
3) Nascar 2000 on the playstation
Nascar 3
The + : 1) Wonderful graphics. The best of the three game.
With this game you have the
feel to be realy on the tracks.
2) Plenty of tracks.
3) The most complete game of the three ( paint
job and other options )
4) Every gauge in the car is real.
5) The best replay
The - : 1) Very difficult to master in simulation mode.
Spin and spin and spin again...
even with the best setting with the
wonswap.
2) No pit animation... A nascar game without pit
animation... it's a shame!
3) All the cars have the same look...
4) Only three view available...
5) The view in the mirror is unrealistic. The
car behind you seems to fly, and you
don't see the road or other details...
6) You don't see your position and the lap in
the same time if you are in the car.
Nascar Revolution
The + : 1) Good graphics
2 ) Plenty of views
3) A real view mirror
4) Easy to master
5) Lot of view
6) Ford looks likes Ford and Chevy looks like
Chevy.
7) The best pit animation I've ever seen.
The - : 1) Not many tracks
2) The sound of the car is not realistic.
3) The voice of the commentator is very
boring, useless, and not realistic.
You can have a crash and the stupid
commentator can say : ''It is a good day
to drive''...
4) The replay.
Nascar 2000 for the playstation:
The + : 1) Very easy to master
2) The best sound of the three game
3) A real view mirror
4) Seven different view!
5) Ford looks like Ford and Chevy looks like
Chevy.
6) Good pit animation
7) Good damage view
8) Estimation of fuel remain: quantity and
lap remaining.
9) 24 tracks.
The - : 1) The graphics are a bit grainy...
2) The replay
And the winner is: NASCAR 2000!
Guill
lol thats a new one on me, nacar 3 is a piece of cake to drive too easy,
have you tried gpl?
Well he did say "game" didnt he?
Why would you buy a game that is easy to master? Doesn't that defeat the
choice.
Nascar 2000 and Nascar Revultion are Arcade games. Nascar 3 is a simulation.
Nascar 3 is too easy to drive. It's almost impossible for me to spin out a
Nascar 3 car if I'm trying.
--
Chris Arndt
===============================
1999 FSSPRO BGN Champion
1999 ISR Shootout Runner up
"All I can do on a given day is put myself
in a position to win, and let circumstances
dictate the outcome"
-Richard Petty
http://CArndt.tripod.com
>lol thats a new one on me, nacar 3 is a piece of cake to drive too easy,
>have you tried gpl?
I have GPL and I can only say this...
If those cars were that hard to drive they should have changed the
rules way before 1967
Lilo ate my harddrive
I'll take an oz. of whatever you're smoking!
pit
Quoted text (22 lines)
>I finally made my choice for the best nacar game. >I tried : 1) Nascar 3 > 2) Nascar revolution > 3) Nascar 2000 on the playstation >Nascar 3 > The + : 1) Wonderful graphics. The best of the three game. >With this game you have the > feel to be realy on the tracks. > 2) Plenty of tracks. > 3) The most complete game of the three ( paint >job and other options ) > 4) Every gauge in the car is real. > 5) The best replay > The - : 1) Very difficult to master in simulation mode. >Spin and spin and spin again... > even with the best setting with the >wonswap. > 2) No pit animation... A nascar game withoutQuoted text (49 lines)
>animation... it's a shame! > 3) All the cars have the same look... > 4) Only three view available... > 5) The view in the mirror is unrealistic. The >car behind you seems to fly, and you > don't see the road or other details... > 6) You don't see your position and the lap in >the same time if you are in the car. >Nascar Revolution > The + : 1) Good graphics > 2 ) Plenty of views > 3) A real view mirror > 4) Easy to master > 5) Lot of view > 6) Ford looks likes Ford and Chevy looks like >Chevy. > 7) The best pit animation I've ever seen. > The - : 1) Not many tracks > 2) The sound of the car is not realistic. > 3) The voice of the commentator is very >boring, useless, and not realistic. > You can have a crash and the stupid >commentator can say : ''It is a good day > to drive''... > 4) The replay. >Nascar 2000 for the playstation: > The + : 1) Very easy to master > 2) The best sound of the three game > 3) A real view mirror > 4) Seven different view! > 5) Ford looks like Ford and Chevy looks like >Chevy. > 6) Good pit animation > 7) Good damage view > 8) Estimation of fuel remain: quantity and >lap remaining. > 9) 24 tracks. > The - : 1) The graphics are a bit grainy... > 2) The replay > And the winner is: NASCAR 2000! >GuillHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Dude, you've got a career in stand -up comedy!
don
[|]-(_)-[|]
>I finally made my choice for the best nacar game.
>I tried : 1) Nascar 3
> 2) Nascar revolution
> 3) Nascar 2000 on the playstation
<SNIP, SNIPPITY, SNIP>
The real cars are not that hard to drive. When driving a real car you get
much more stimulus from what you are doing, i.e., you "feel" things. Not so
when driving on a computer.
Quoted text (8 lines)
> >lol thats a new one on me, nacar 3 is a piece of cake to drive too easy, > >have you tried gpl? > I have GPL and I can only say this... > If those cars were that hard to drive they should have changed the > rules way before 1967 > Lilo ate my harddrive>I finally made my choice for the best nacar game.
I saw your later post about N3, so I'm not going to try to CHANGE your
mind - just show you why things were done the way they were.
I have it.
I have it.
Never seen it.
It's got to be your driving style. You do know there's a brake pedal,
right? I ask that because EVERY person I've seen complain about that (in
person, at least) drives every track with their foot on the floor. It's
been my experience (and has been borne out by others here) that the "Ace"
setup is VERY stable right out of the box on most tracks, and hard to spin
under NORMAL racing conditions.
Unnecessary waste of diskspace. Would be "nice," but hardly "a shame."
So does NasRev, IMO. Out of the box I definately agree, but many of the
paintjobs available have changed them enough to make them appear different.
Only ONE is needed, anyway - in-car.
Unnecessary waste of CPU power: the only thing needed in the mirror is
an accurate view of CARS behind you - I don't care about the tree I just
passed, or the billboards on the walls. Again, it'd be "nice," but hardly
important enough to waste CPU cycles on it.
the same time if you are in the
I agree wholeheartedly with this one!! We should also be able to BOTH
"Best Lap so Far" and "Last Lap" speeds. We had that in Nascar 1.
Ashamedly, even better than N3.
My guess is they used their licensing money up by the time they got to
the tracks. I'm sure various locations are less important to EA than more
advertisers.
Not TERRIBLE out of the box, but pretty boring quickly.
boring, useless, and not realistic.
DEFINATELY not enough variety in statements and "events" that cause the
phrases.
Unneeded.
Wasted.
Unnecessary
Not sure what you mean here. If you're worried the extent of your
damage, there are two way to see that in N3: 1) in replay mode, switch to
different camera angles around your car to see all the sides; 2) the "far
back" view can give you a decent idea of your whole car.
lap remaining.
N3 has this, too. I think it's F3, but it'll tell you how many laps
remain on your current fuel load.
This is more a limitation of your TV, than the game. There's not enough
scan lines to really even get 640x480. N3 and NasRev go up to 1024x768.
I think you're basing your decision on invalid (or unimportant) points -
which is most CERTAINLY your right. I'm not saying your wrong, I just
disagree with your arguments. For
"let's-have-fun-since-I-only-have-a-few-minutes-to-run-a-few-laps" I think
NasRev wins hands down. For "I-want-to-immerse-myself-in-the-experience"
racing, N3 wins hands down.
DISCLAIMER: I've never seen N2000 on the Playstation.
Gunner
The best NASCAR game?
The next one
Stefano


































