Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Most accurate cycle racing sim to date?

14 posts by 11 people · 19 Aug 1999 - 23 Aug 1999

Destroy 19 Aug 1999#486919
I'm hoping that AMA Superbike game will get it right, no other game has. <sigh>
Dave Henrie 20 Aug 1999#487127
The real shame may be that this title will sell ABSOLUTELY zero in Europe. Even if AMA superbike delivers on the 'gpl' level of physics, I just don't see any Euro guys giving up the GP500 license for an American series. Who in Britain, would choose to race at Branaird Minnesota instead of Brands Hatch? But since a couple of the top riders are Kiwi's, you might see some sales to those Ozlanders but, I really don't think we are gonna see a huge market. and brand loyalty, the Ducati is such a *** ride right now, what Honda fan will pick it up? any Muzzy Kawasaki fans?? I'm really looking forward to this title, mainly since if it suceeds, it will pay off in spades for the upcomming Can Am sim. but the odds are really stacked against it.. dave henrie > I'm hoping that AMA Superbike game will get it right, no other game has. > <sigh>
Doug Gordon 20 Aug 1999#487128
I doubt that anyone ever will "get it right" with a m/c sim. Motorcycle racing is just so much more "physical" than auto racing -- you have to do a lot more with shifting your weight, etc. -- that it is almost impossible to duplicate with the controls available when sitting in front of a PC. Think about it: with wheels and pedals you can imagine yourself driving a car when playing GPL or F1RS, but how close can you get to the controls for a cycle? Not very! I'll take a look at the AMA game when it comes out, but I've been ultimately disappointed by every m/c racing sim that I've tried. Doug G Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Reg Mucke 20 Aug 1999#487129
Kawi rules,I have a 98 ZX7R green baby:)
Quoted text (19 lines)> The real shame may be that this title will sell ABSOLUTELY zero > in Europe. Even if AMA superbike delivers on the 'gpl' level of > physics, I just don't see any Euro guys giving up the GP500 license > for an American series. Who in Britain, would choose to race at > Branaird Minnesota instead of Brands Hatch? But since a couple of > the top riders are Kiwi's, you might see some sales to those Ozlanders > but, I really don't think we are gonna see a huge market. and brand > loyalty, the Ducati is such a *** ride right now, what Honda > fan will pick it up? any Muzzy Kawasaki fans?? I'm really looking > forward to this title, mainly since if it suceeds, it will pay off in > spades for the upcomming Can Am sim. but the odds are really stacked > against it.. > dave henrie > > I'm hoping that AMA Superbike game will get it right, no other game has. > > <sigh>
Zonky 20 Aug 1999#487130
>> The real shame may be that this title will sell ABSOLUTELY zero >> in Europe. Even if AMA superbike delivers on the 'gpl' level of >> physics, I just don't see any Euro guys giving up the GP500 license >> for an American series. Who in Britain, would choose to race at >> Branaird Minnesota instead of Brands Hatch? 500cc's do not race at Brands Hatch. Both the British & World Superbike series do, however. Likewise, the kiwi's run in World Superbikes. Z. Please remove NOSPAM from my email address when replying.
GT2X 20 Aug 1999#487131
Quoted text (11 lines)>>> The real shame may be that this title will sell ABSOLUTELY zero >>> in Europe. Even if AMA superbike delivers on the 'gpl' level of >>> physics, I just don't see any Euro guys giving up the GP500 license >>> for an American series. Who in Britain, would choose to race at >>> Branaird Minnesota instead of Brands Hatch? >500cc's do not race at Brands Hatch. >Both the British & World Superbike series do, however. >Likewise, the kiwi's run in World Superbikes.
Slight diversion: Idea for a good game or simulation: Tourist Trophy. Adrian.
Bj.O.rn 20 Aug 1999#487132
> I doubt that anyone ever will "get it right" with a m/c sim. Motorcycle > racing is just so much more "physical" than auto racing -- you have to > do a lot more with shifting your weight, etc. -- that it is almost > impossible to duplicate with the controls available when sitting in > front of a PC. I'm sad to say that I have to agree on that.... Even though I'm a *** motorcycle racing fan and Ducatista, (tested the demo for world superbike in The Ducati factory lunch resturant at Borgo Panigale, Bologna on a big screen back in June '98 :-)) But to accurately duplicate a real life bike to a computer game is just not possible... To ride a bike on a track close to the limit is to a large extent a matter of what you feel, How hard can I brake, how fast can I throw the bike into lean, knee on ground, is the front close to wash out, is the rear gripping enough, can I give it more trottle.... Its just not possible to do this by what you see on a screen not even with the best FF in the world.... I do have SBK, but It started to gather dust on my shelf after 3 weeks, I got back to GPL.... /Bj.O.rn, SDK #1225
Dave Henrie 21 Aug 1999#487316
I've thought about that, I kinda think the Flight sim guys will have the answer. Motorsims claimed they had many many controller options already figured out..which I hope is true and is good. Think about a typical hard core flight sim setup. Joystick, Throttle, pedals. With the pedals you have the gas and brake. I know it's not the Motorcycle roll on throttle but what the heck. With the throttle, you have a front/rear weight transfer. With the joystick you can have left/right weight transfer add all these together and you have the basic elements of a pretty sophisticated conrol setup. Do-able? could this be the answer to a good motorcycle controller? dave henrie
Quoted text (18 lines)> > I'm hoping that AMA Superbike game will get it right, no other game > has. > > <sigh> > I doubt that anyone ever will "get it right" with a m/c sim. Motorcycle > racing is just so much more "physical" than auto racing -- you have to > do a lot more with shifting your weight, etc. -- that it is almost > impossible to duplicate with the controls available when sitting in > front of a PC. Think about it: with wheels and pedals you can imagine > yourself driving a car when playing GPL or F1RS, but how close can you > get to the controls for a cycle? Not very! I'll take a look at the AMA > game when it comes out, but I've been ultimately disappointed by every > m/c racing sim that I've tried. > Doug G > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Quoted text (12 lines)> I've thought about that, I kinda think the Flight sim guys > will have the answer. Motorsims claimed they had many many controller > options already figured out..which I hope is true and is good. Think > about a typical hard core flight sim setup. > Joystick, Throttle, pedals. > With the pedals you have the gas and brake. I know it's not the > Motorcycle roll on throttle but what the heck. With the throttle, you > have a front/rear weight transfer. With the joystick you can have > left/right weight transfer add all these together and you have the > basic elements of a pretty sophisticated conrol setup. Do-able? > could this be the answer to a good motorcycle controller? > dave henrie
What I like to do is cheat a little bit and use 5 axes. I have a 4 axis USB stick (with twist) and a serial connected wheel and pedals set. I use the pedals for throttle and front brake with rear brake "geared" to the front brake signal. (Like brake bias in a car) I use the stick left/right for lean, fore and aft stick for rider pitch tucked forward and sitting up, and the twist for rider lean right and left. I prefer our on-the-bike view and like moving the rider body myself rather than using the automated system (even though I designed it.) As an experienced flight simmer, I don't like someone else moving my head ;) Not important to most probably, but I use the slider axis on the stick as an extra camera "range" function while working with the game. (That lets me move the viewpoint around while still controlling the bike.) The pedals also leave me a hand free to take notes or whatever. Stick buttons for shifting, button clutch, and a "push back", and hat switch for some view switching. Looking back while in a slow corner is a pretty wild stunt that I'd like to learn just to show off, ;) but I can't imagine it being all that useful except for clearing the track when rejoining after an off. You sort of have to glance back, then look forward again while only then trying to figure out what you just saw in the glance without going off into a bridge abutment or something ;) I feel a little guilty using 5 axes because USB stuff isn't everywhere yet. I really should be using a tiny slider half for brake and half for throttle (probably the worst case for controlability) but I hate to work that hard! ;) If they only had my flight gear ready in USB I'd probably have about 6 controllers hooked up... ;) - Para -- Matthew V. Jessick Motorsims Vehicle Dynamics Engineer (972)910-8866 Ext.125, Fax: (972)910-8216 "USB is the greatest thing since sliced bread."
Destroy 21 Aug 1999#487318
I disagree. While yes, there are more inputs to racing a motorcycle, not all of them are absolutely necessary for a game to feel right or be a good sim. Take GP500 for example, enter a turn fast as you can and throw the bike hard into the turn. Does the bike loose its front wheel and go tumbling into the dirt? Nope. This is simply terrible physics. And the lean angle that can be achieved in the sand trap or grass is total fiction in GP500. I dont need complexity of controls or game operation, I just want the damn physics to be and feel right for once!!
Ma 21 Aug 1999#487319
Put the game on simulation for one. Also, the developers already said the demo's physics were toned down so players would not get discouraged right away.
> I doubt that anyone ever will "get it right" with a m/c sim. Motorcycle > racing is just so much more "physical" than auto racing -- you have to > do a lot more with shifting your weight, etc. -- that it is almost > impossible to duplicate with the controls available when sitting in > front of a PC. It could probably be done with the "Fly By Wire approach" used for planes. The idea being that you don't tell the plane what the position of the control surfaces should be, you tell it what you want it to do. Then the FBW makes the necessary control surface deflections to get it there (within what the flight envelope allows, of course). If you apply this to a bike sim, you'd be giving input telling the computer that you want to turn harder and the "virtual you" on the bike would be assumed by the computer to know how to distribute his/her weight around correctly. Of course, this gives less control. E.g. if you can do the same turn by either shifting your weight or turning the handle bars (I don't know what racing 500cc bikes are like, all the bikes I ride have pedals for propulsion) the computer makes this decision and not you. But overall, I think it's the only reasonable way. How much you lean out oughta be pretty much intuitive when you're on a bike for real - not so if you're using a joystick to lean with. Just my $.02. Cheers, /ft
> Put the game on simulation for one. Also, the developers > already said the demo's physics were toned down so players > would not get discouraged right away. What about those of us who 'get discouraged' from buying the game because the demo doesn't have the level of accuracy we are looking for? The demo already has a button that toggles between simulation mode and arcade mode, why tone down the simulation mode to make the arcade players happy? Add an intermediate mode if that is truly a concern. The point of a demo is to give prospective buyers a chance to test out a product before they actaully have to commit to buying it. In this manner, we can make an informed decision about whether the developers actually delivered on the claims their marketing department has made. I'm afraid further promises from either camp isn't really useful in that decision making process. Hopefully another demo will be released that contains the complete physics model in it's final shipping form so that those of us that are looking for complete realism can make an informed decision. That said I would still rate the GP500 demo above all other motorcycle games in terms of accuracy (that would also include the current beta of AMA Superbike Racing). - George
Destroy 23 Aug 1999#487600
Aw man, I sure hope you're wrong on this one. Its my last hope. Dont think there are any other cycle sims in the make?

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy