Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

I wants old VROC with GPL 1.0

10 posts by 8 people · 22 Jul 1999 - 24 Jul 1999

Hot Pant 22 Jul 1999#482085
Yeah, so it looks pretty dead at the original VROC! This bites, as I'm not going anywhere near the GPL patch what with the problems it's giving people. Guess I'll have to continue "playing with myself"... Hot Pants
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:19:14 -0700, "Hot Pants" >Yeah, so it looks pretty dead at the original VROC! This bites, as I'm not >going anywhere near the GPL patch what with the problems it's giving people. >Guess I'll have to continue "playing with myself"... You should at least give it a try, since a lot of us *aren't* having problems. Most online slowdowns have been solved with using the old sync method (0). Most offline slowdowns have been traced to PCI internal modems. There will be a new patch, but that's weeks away. So why deprive yourself, Mr. Pants? If you feel really scared by the patch, either: * do a completely separate install of 1.1, or * save a copy of your 1.0 GPL.EXE and CORE.INI and swap with the 1.1 versions if you want to go back (that's what we're doing in the GPLWS). "But in a way, fear is a big part of racing, because if there was nothing to be frightened of, and no limit, any fool could get into a motor car and racing would not exist as a sport." -- Jim Clark
Neil Raine 23 Jul 1999#482266
> Yeah, so it looks pretty dead at the original VROC! This bites, as I'm not > going anywhere near the GPL patch what with the problems it's giving people. > Guess I'll have to continue "playing with myself"... I've also felt that it's harder to get a decent race at VROC since the 1.1 patch came out. There seem to be less drivers out there, but the main thing I've noticed is that what with all these dedicated servers hosting races continuously, the drivers are spread more thinly between them. It seems to me that people stay in the paddock waiting to see which server everyone else will join before committing themselves! The pings are much better, but what's the point of that if you're the only one in the race? On top of all that, I've now found that the AI are great fun to race with - the consensus seems to be that they've actually improved since 1.0, but I couldn't say that for certain - it's only recently that I've become quick enough to compete with the top AI cars.
Quoted text (12 lines)>I've also felt that it's harder to get a decent race at VROC since the >1.1 patch came out. > >There seem to be less drivers out there, but the main thing I've noticed >is that what with all these dedicated servers hosting races >continuously, the drivers are spread more thinly between them. > >It seems to me that people stay in the paddock waiting to see which >server everyone else will join before committing themselves! > >The pings are much better, but what's the point of that if you're the >only one in the race?
Neil, I've mentioned the same thing for the last several nights in the chatroom at spyboy2. The same half dozen or so dedicated servers are hosting unattended races,and most of them have 1 driver listed,the host. What races have 6 or more drivers are either private races or F2 or F3. I don't understand the point of allowing these unattended races,as it doesn't promote racing,but quite the opposite. We were actually better off with the old system. I wound up hot lapping several times,and this isn't what VROC is all about. And the strange thing is that several times while in the chat room,we decided to race at a track with a host from the chat room. Joel Willstein [email hidden]
Neil Raine 23 Jul 1999#482268
Quoted text (14 lines)> Neil, > I've mentioned the same thing for the last several nights in the > chatroom at spyboy2. The same half dozen or so dedicated servers are hosting > unattended races,and most of them have 1 driver listed,the host. What races > have 6 or more drivers are either private races or F2 or F3. > I don't understand the point of allowing these unattended races,as it > doesn't promote racing,but quite the opposite. We were actually better off > with the old system. I wound up hot lapping several times,and this isn't > what VROC is all about. > And the strange thing is that several times while in the chat room,we > decided to race at a track with a host from the chat room.
In the old scheme of things I often hosted races and we had a great time, even though the actual connection was not as good as with these new servers. Maybe it would be better if the servers were more "public", so that anyone from the chat room could control one remotely - that way a group of people could decide to race at a certain track and then commandeer an unused server to host the race. It's just a question of the "boss" password being known to the racers, I believe. I guess this is a bit dodgy in that you can have more than one boss for a server and they might disagree over where to go next!
The problem isn't too many servers, but rather too few drivers to fill them. So for all of you who have been thinking about *maybe* trying online racing, here's your opportunity. See you there! http://www.vroc.net On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:34:50 -0400, "Joel Willstein"
Quoted text (30 lines)>>I've also felt that it's harder to get a decent race at VROC since the >>1.1 patch came out. >> >>There seem to be less drivers out there, but the main thing I've noticed >>is that what with all these dedicated servers hosting races >>continuously, the drivers are spread more thinly between them. >> >>It seems to me that people stay in the paddock waiting to see which >>server everyone else will join before committing themselves! >> >>The pings are much better, but what's the point of that if you're the >>only one in the race? >Neil, > I've mentioned the same thing for the last several nights in the >chatroom at spyboy2. The same half dozen or so dedicated servers are hosting >unattended races,and most of them have 1 driver listed,the host. What races >have 6 or more drivers are either private races or F2 or F3. > I don't understand the point of allowing these unattended races,as it >doesn't promote racing,but quite the opposite. We were actually better off >with the old system. I wound up hot lapping several times,and this isn't >what VROC is all about. > And the strange thing is that several times while in the chat room,we >decided to race at a track with a host from the chat room. >Joel Willstein >[email hidden]
"But in a way, fear is a big part of racing, because if there was nothing to be frightened of, and no limit, any fool could get into a motor car and racing would not exist as a sport." -- Jim Clark
Ron Ayton 24 Jul 1999#482443
I agree Chris, that's strange for us, isn't it.. ? :-) On the subject of too many dedicated hosts and not enough drivers, down here in Australia, a lot of us would love to join some of the dedicated hosts of an evening (Australian time) but some of the dedicated hosts in question have the maximum latency set too low to allow us to enter, so the dedicated hosts simply sit their in all their low latency dedicated glory doing no-one any good at all.. What's the sense of creating a dedicated host, if dedicated racers can't get into it ? Please, dedicated hosts, set your maximum latency allowed at 600, it will certainly get more people involved in GPL, and "NO", a client with a ping of 400 to 600 will NOT create warpy and accident prone racing.!! Cheers, Ron
EldredP 24 Jul 1999#482444
Quoted text (15 lines)>I agree Chris, that's strange for us, isn't it.. ? :-) >On the subject of too many dedicated hosts and not enough drivers, down >here in Australia, a lot of us would love to join some of the dedicated >hosts of an evening (Australian time) but some of the dedicated hosts >in question have the maximum latency set too low to allow us to enter, >so the dedicated hosts simply sit their in all their low latency >dedicated glory doing no-one any good at all.. >What's the sense of creating a dedicated host, if dedicated racers >can't get into it ? >Please, dedicated hosts, set your maximum latency allowed at 600, it >will certainly get more people involved in GPL, and "NO", a client with >a ping of 400 to 600 will NOT create warpy and accident prone racing.!! >Cheers, >Ron
Mine's set up with NO limits on entering(E. Pickett). Try it out, and send me some e-mail feedback on how it works for you. It'll be running all weekend. Eldred __ Put your message in a modem, and throw it in the ***-sea... remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Remco Moedt 24 Jul 1999#482445
>Please, dedicated hosts, set your maximum latency allowed at 600, it >will certainly get more people involved in GPL, and "NO", a client with >a ping of 400 to 600 will NOT create warpy and accident prone racing.!! I second that! Joined a race on an Australian host (I am from the Netherlands, can't be further away <g>) and it was certainly raceable with a latency of 650ms! Remco

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy