Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

GPL vs. rFactor: Number of available tracks

12 posts by 8 people · 19 Dec 2007 18:48 UTC - 31 Jan 2008 16:38 UTC

Fritz 19 Dec 2007 18:48 UTC#4810
just checked: rfactor central states 341 tracks for rfactor... 559 tracks for GPL according to Track Database2... so dont worry :-)
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:48:58 +0100, Fritz wrote: > > rfactor central states 341 tracks for rfactor... > > 559 tracks for GPL according to Track Database2... > > so dont worry :-) I would ;-) A quick select count(*) on rF Rank's "tracks" table yields 501 results, so rFactor is catching up it seems. How many new tracks have been released for GPL in the last six months or so? (serious question, I have no idea actually) Cheers, uwe --
On Dec 20, 12:06 pm, Uwe Schürkamp <[email hidden]> wrote: > yields 501 results, so rFactor is catching up it seems. How many > new tracks have been released for GPL in the last six months or so? > (serious question, I have no idea actually) > > Cheers, uwe Go to http://gpltd.bcsims.com/ > advanced search > date: new to old Going back from mid December to mid June, there have been 16 releases but two of those are special "Night mod" track remakes of originals. So 14 new tracks in 6 months. There have been a total of about 32 new releases in the past year. The only bad thing I have to say about the modern Sims is that rFactor has a terribly confusing amount of track versions and car mods. Trying to join a pick up race can be confusing when you think you have what is displayed. But GPL is still very much alive with 5+ car mods being worked on (most are a looong way off) and the 66 cars promised to be released in a week or so.
On Dec 20, 7:48 am, "Fritz" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (7 lines)> just checked: > > rfactor central states 341 tracks for rfactor... > > 559 tracks for GPL according to Track Database2... > > so dont worry :-)
Let it die dammit! A 10 year old game should only ever be played for nostalgia reasons alone! If you are still playing a 10 year old game regularly then you are living in the past!!
On Dec 23, 6:20 am, flightlessvacuum <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (8 lines)> > Let it die dammit! > > A 10 year old game should only ever be played for nostalgia reasons > alone! > > If you are still playing a 10 year old game regularly then you are > living in the past!!
I'd agree with you for many games/Sims, but GPL has grown with the times. The soon to come out 1966 mod will stand up to anything modern, except for graphic features like shadows etc which aren't really essential to the driving experience. While it is a nostalgic exercise in that the modern top level cars aren't anything like these, the driving is still loads of fun, just like in Formula Ford etc (although I don't race and am just going by what I read).
"flightlessvacuum" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)> On Dec 20, 7:48 am, "Fritz" <[email hidden]> wrote: >> just checked: >> >> rfactor central states 341 tracks for rfactor... >> >> 559 tracks for GPL according to Track Database2... >> >> so dont worry :-) > > Let it die dammit! > > A 10 year old game should only ever be played for nostalgia reasons > alone! > > If you are still playing a 10 year old game regularly then you are > living in the past!!
Don't be stupid! GPL can still hold its own - as expect you can, you wanker.
Bob Simpson wrote:
Quoted text (9 lines)> I'd agree with you for many games/Sims, but GPL has grown with the > times. The soon to come out 1966 mod will stand up to anything > modern, except for graphic features like shadows etc which aren't > really essential to the driving experience. > > While it is a nostalgic exercise in that the modern top level cars > aren't anything like these, the driving is still loads of fun, just > like in Formula Ford etc (although I don't race and am just going by > what I read).
I just installed GPL once again yesterday and installed the GP79 mod. It may have been a good game for penis envy masochists but it is crap compared to the racing games I play today and how these cars really were. Jackie Stewart wasn't kidding when he said GPL drives nothing like the real thing. All those dudes who told us it is very realistic were full of shit. It's like the flight simmers who way back claimed the flight models in 1942: PAW were realistic. It was a good game for its time but the to claim the flight models were realistic is complete BS. I'm in agreement that GPL is only mildly interesting from a nostalgia viewpoint and all these people still doing mods for it are wasting their time and their talents would be put to better use in racing sims with better driving models and graphics engines.
Here be a microcosm of youth - no knowledge of history, little real world experience yet a complete know it all. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt on your youth. If you're not young then neck yourself - your life is a failure! :) "Backspace" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:vMWnj.24777$4w.20541@pd7urf2no...
Quoted text (24 lines)> Bob Simpson wrote: > >> I'd agree with you for many games/Sims, but GPL has grown with the >> times. The soon to come out 1966 mod will stand up to anything >> modern, except for graphic features like shadows etc which aren't >> really essential to the driving experience. >> >> While it is a nostalgic exercise in that the modern top level cars >> aren't anything like these, the driving is still loads of fun, just >> like in Formula Ford etc (although I don't race and am just going by >> what I read). > > I just installed GPL once again yesterday and installed the GP79 mod. It > may have been a good game for penis envy masochists but it is crap > compared to the racing games I play today and how these cars really were. > Jackie Stewart wasn't kidding when he said GPL drives nothing like the > real thing. All those dudes who told us it is very realistic were full of > shit. It's like the flight simmers who way back claimed the flight models > in 1942: PAW were realistic. It was a good game for its time but the to > claim the flight models were realistic is complete BS. > I'm in agreement that GPL is only mildly interesting from a nostalgia > viewpoint and all these people still doing mods for it are wasting their > time and their talents would be put to better use in racing sims with > better driving models and graphics engines.
Byron Forbes wrote: > Here be a microcosm of youth - no knowledge of history, little real > world experience yet a complete know it all. I am giving you the benefit of > the doubt on your youth. If you're not young then neck yourself - your life > is a failure! :) I used Jackie Stewart's comments regarding GPL to back up my opinion, who you quoting? Right, no one, moron. Makes you feel like a *real* man because you like GPL or what? News Flash: You're just another small dicked computer dork and think just because a racing sim is harder than all others then it must be more real too. There is the fatal flaw of those who think GPL is the best of the best. You are completely misguided dumbasses.
Mitch, is that you? "Backspace" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:AkZnj.24950$4w.4878@pd7urf2no...
Quoted text (12 lines)> Byron Forbes wrote: >> Here be a microcosm of youth - no knowledge of history, little real >> world experience yet a complete know it all. I am giving you the benefit >> of the doubt on your youth. If you're not young then neck yourself - your >> life is a failure! :) > > I used Jackie Stewart's comments regarding GPL to back up my opinion, who > you quoting? Right, no one, moron. Makes you feel like a *real* man > because you like GPL or what? News Flash: You're just another small dicked > computer dork and think just because a racing sim is harder than all > others then it must be more real too. There is the fatal flaw of those who > think GPL is the best of the best. You are completely misguided dumbasses.
Poor old Jackie's been senile for years! No, hang on - I'll bet he's as sharp now as he was when he was driving the real deal. Anyway, your words are clearly from a twit who was not around pre GPL nor when it was released. No sim is ever going to compete with that experience and impact. If you like getting nicked up all the time keep rubbishing GPL and you'll be just that! :) Maybe you're working your way to a trip to the pyramids with a megaphone shouting out - "Allah takes it up the arse....Allah takes it up the arse...................." ???? "Backspace" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:AkZnj.24950$4w.4878@pd7urf2no...
Quoted text (12 lines)> Byron Forbes wrote: >> Here be a microcosm of youth - no knowledge of history, little real >> world experience yet a complete know it all. I am giving you the benefit >> of the doubt on your youth. If you're not young then neck yourself - your >> life is a failure! :) > > I used Jackie Stewart's comments regarding GPL to back up my opinion, who > you quoting? Right, no one, moron. Makes you feel like a *real* man > because you like GPL or what? News Flash: You're just another small dicked > computer dork and think just because a racing sim is harder than all > others then it must be more real too. There is the fatal flaw of those who > think GPL is the best of the best. You are completely misguided dumbasses.

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy