For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got for
developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that are
toxic.
This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and
you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com
===================================================
Dear Mr. Wilshe:
The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a
confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by
1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and
their
proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter
62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain
microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies
petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants.
The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence
dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating that
the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes.
Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the
remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater
criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in Chapter
62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time to
simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum
groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO
Commercial
All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some
time
in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an
ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established
before it is introduced to an aquifer.
Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for
the
composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of the
product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as
general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply with
the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories, each
of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that the
bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know whether
there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each
category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made
by
the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given.
pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner
concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection,
the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, which is
not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water
standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c),
F.A.C.,
applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial
Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a
parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard;
(b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with pH;
and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH.
62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical
species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in
the
current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant
cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby
vouches
that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will exceed
its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate is
mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary fluid
to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO
Commercial
All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations
of
total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will
exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed
the
5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L minimum
groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777,
F.A.C.
The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and
instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page
www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of
discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner
can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation.
FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical
species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the
U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that is
often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States"
(EAFUS).
The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary
identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate
that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical species in
the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
(ppm).
Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low
concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum Storage
Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
environmental
concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and chemical
species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or
environmental
issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may
have
to be developed and imposed.
For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing ECCO
Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
the
fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is proprietary,
it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength)
and
provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure
regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the Department.
Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also
the
supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
surfactant
is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy
of
this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan.
Sincerely,
Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach
Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader
Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems
Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6
Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
10200 Betsy Parkway
St. James City, Florida 33956
http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
Email: [email hidden]
888 578 9600
FAx: 888 485-8765
USA: 239 283-1222
--
Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
10200 Betsy Parkway
St. James City, Florida 33956
http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
Email: [email hidden]
888 578 9600
FAx: 888 485-8765
USA: 239 283-1222
Don Wilshe posts about his bio-remediation chemical business
Don Wilshe posted a letter about his company's bio-remediation chemistry products. Tim Miser called it spam and reported it, Eltigre disputed that definition, and others responded with jokes, including a running gag about degreasing a deep fryer. The thread ended with Tim Miser restating why off-topic self-promotion counts as spam.
off-topiccommunity/metahumour
Automated summary.
Please don't spam this newsgroup.
You have been reported.
[email hidden]
In article <Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]>, "Don Wilshe"
<[email hidden]> writes:
>For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got for
>
>developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that are
>toxic.
WTF? I only understood about 20% of that...<g>
Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
On 03 Dec 2003 04:56:13 GMT, [email hidden] (EldredP) wrote:
>WTF? I only understood about 20% of that...<g>
He makes synthetic bull shit. Seems oddly appropriate.
Jason
Ya, but it sells for many millions.. lol
don
"jason moyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (7 lines)
> On 03 Dec 2003 04:56:13 GMT, [email hidden] (EldredP) wrote: > > >WTF? I only understood about 20% of that...<g> > > He makes synthetic bull shit. Seems oddly appropriate. > > JasonDon. Some past owners of the world's greatest minds have been
wacho......not that I'm implying anything here. :-P
--
Brian Tate
DSTP Motorsports Public Relations
http://www.dstpmotorsports.com http://www.toyotaatlantic.com
"Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]...
> For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got
for
>
> developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that
are
> toxic.
>
> This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and
>
> you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ===================================================
>
> Dear Mr. Wilshe:
>
>
>
> The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a
>
> confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by
>
> 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and
> their
>
> proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
>
> Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter
>
> 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain
>
> microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies
>
> petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants.
>
>
>
> The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence
>
> dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating
that
>
> the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose
>
> Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes.
>
> Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the
>
> remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater
>
> criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in
Chapter
>
> 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
>
> concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time
to
>
> simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum
>
> groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO
> Commercial
>
> All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some
> time
>
> in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an
>
> ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established
>
> before it is introduced to an aquifer.
>
>
>
> Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for
> the
>
> composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of
the
>
> product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as
>
> general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All
> Purpose
>
> Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply
with
>
> the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories,
each
>
> of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that
the
>
> bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know
whether
>
> there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each
>
> category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
>
> parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
>
> injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made
> by
>
> the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given.
>
>
>
>
> pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner
>
> concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to
injection,
>
> the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, which
is
>
> not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water
>
> standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c),
> F.A.C.,
>
> applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial
>
> Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a
>
> parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard;
>
> (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with
pH;
>
> and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH.
>
>
>
> 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical
>
> species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in
> the
>
> current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant
>
> cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby
> vouches
>
> that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will
exceed
>
> its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
>
> one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate
is
>
> mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
>
> Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary
fluid
>
> to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO
> Commercial
>
> All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations
> of
>
> total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will
>
> exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
>
> 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
>
> therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed
> the
>
> 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L
minimum
>
> groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777,
> F.A.C.
>
> The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and
>
> instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page
>
> www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of
>
> discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose
> Cleaner
>
> can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation.
>
> FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical
>
> species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the
> U.S.
>
> Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that
is
>
> often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States"
> (EAFUS).
>
>
>
> The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary
>
> identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate
>
> that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical species
in
>
> the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
> (ppm).
>
> Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low
>
> concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum
Storage
>
> Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
> environmental
>
> concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and
chemical
>
> species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or
> environmental
>
> issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may
> have
>
> to be developed and imposed.
>
>
>
> For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing
ECCO
>
> Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
> the
>
> fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is
proprietary,
>
> it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All
> Purpose
>
> Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength)
> and
>
> provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure
>
>
>
> regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the
Department.
>
> Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also
> the
>
> supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
> surfactant
>
> is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy
> of
>
> this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach
>
> Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader
>
> Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems
>
> Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
> 1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
> 10200 Betsy Parkway
> St. James City, Florida 33956
> http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
> Email: [email hidden]
> 888 578 9600
> FAx: 888 485-8765
> USA: 239 283-1222
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
> 1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
> 10200 Betsy Parkway
> St. James City, Florida 33956
> http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
> Email: [email hidden]
> 888 578 9600
> FAx: 888 485-8765
> USA: 239 283-1222
>
>
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:53:44 GMT, "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
>1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
>10200 Betsy Parkway
>St. James City, Florida 33956
<plonk>
splash
flush
Don Wilshe wrote:
> Ya, but it sells for many millions.. lol
Taking about how rich you are, how vulgar!
--
Gerry Aitken©
...and a friend shall lose a friend's hammer. - Book of Cyril, chapter
6, verse 16
This e-mail has been scanned for all known viruses by a fish called Colin.
lol
i agree
dw
"Brian Tate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Chapter
correspondence
> >
> > dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating
> that
> >
> > the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial AllPurpose
> >
> > Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediationpurposes.
an
> >
> > ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to beestablished
> >
> > before it is introduced to an aquifer.
> >
> >
> >
> > Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouchesfor
each
> >
> > category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
> >
> > parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
> >
> > injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgmentmade
which
Remedial
chemical
> >
> > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listedin
concentrations
> > of
> >
> > total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogenwill
> >
> > exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
> >
> > 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
> >
> > therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarilyexceed
of
chemical
proprietary
> >
> > identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like toindicate
> >
> > that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemicalspecies
> in
> >
> > the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
> > (ppm).
> >
> > Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in suchlow
of
strength)
also
> > the
> >
> > supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
> > surfactant
> >
> > is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and acopy
Quoted text (42 lines)
> Don. Some past owners of the world's greatest minds have been > wacho......not that I'm implying anything here. :-P > > -- > Brian Tate > DSTP Motorsports Public Relations > http://www.dstpmotorsports.com http://www.toyotaatlantic.com > > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]... > > For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got > for > > > > developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that > are > > toxic. > > > > This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and > > > > you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com > > > > > > > > > > > > =================================================== > > > > Dear Mr. Wilshe: > > > > > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a > > > > confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by > > > > 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and > > their > > > > proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > > > Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant toQuoted text (10 lines)
> > > > 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain > > > > microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies > > > > petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants. > > > > > > > > The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplementalQuoted text (22 lines)
> > > > Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the > > > > remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater > > > > criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in > Chapter > > > > 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental > > > > concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time > to > > > > simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum > > > > groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO > > Commercial > > > > All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some > > time > > > > in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant asQuoted text (23 lines)
> > the > > > > composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of > the > > > > product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as > > > > general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All > > Purpose > > > > Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply > with > > > > the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories, > each > > > > of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that > the > > > > bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know > whether > > > > there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, forQuoted text (13 lines)
> > by > > > > the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given. > > > > > > > > > > pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner > > > > concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to > injection, > > > > the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72,Quoted text (8 lines)
> is > > > > not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water > > > > standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c), > > F.A.C., > > > > applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approvedQuoted text (13 lines)
> > > > Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a > > > > parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard; > > > > (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with > pH; > > > > and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH. > > > > > > > > 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietaryQuoted text (24 lines)
> > the > > > > current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant > > > > cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby > > vouches > > > > that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will > exceed > > > > its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when > > > > one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate > is > > > > mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection. > > > > Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary > fluid > > > > to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO > > Commercial > > > > All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, theQuoted text (13 lines)
> > the > > > > 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L > minimum > > > > groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777, > > F.A.C. > > > > The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and > > > > instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page > > > > www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zoneQuoted text (7 lines)
> > > > discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose > > Cleaner > > > > can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation. > > > > FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients orQuoted text (13 lines)
> > > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the > > U.S. > > > > Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that > is > > > > often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States" > > (EAFUS). > > > > > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging theQuoted text (24 lines)
> > > > concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum > Storage > > > > Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and > > environmental > > > > concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and > chemical > > > > species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or > > environmental > > > > issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may > > have > > > > to be developed and imposed. > > > > > > > > For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing > ECCO > > > > Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and compositionQuoted text (9 lines)
> > the > > > > fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is > proprietary, > > > > it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All > > Purpose > > > > Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volumeQuoted text (10 lines)
> > and > > > > provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure > > > > > > > > regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the > Department. > > > > Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure andQuoted text (54 lines)
> > of > > > > this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach > > > > Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader > > > > Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems > > > > Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > > 10200 Betsy Parkway > > St. James City, Florida 33956 > > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > > Email: [email hidden] > > 888 578 9600 > > FAx: 888 485-8765 > > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > > 10200 Betsy Parkway > > St. James City, Florida 33956 > > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > > Email: [email hidden] > > 888 578 9600 > > FAx: 888 485-8765 > > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > > > >Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. The definition of Spam as I understand it is:
Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially identical content.
Please enlighten me.
Tks
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8Xdzb.287288$ao4.1003987@attbi_s51...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Please don't spam this newsgroup. > > You have been reported. > > [email hidden] > > >Spam is anything that has nothing to do with the newsgroup where it was posted.
--
Steve
"I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and a woman."
A. Schwarzenegger
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. The definition of Spam as I
understand it is:
Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as part of a larger collection of
messages, all having substantially identical content.
Please enlighten me.
Tks
so a response to a question/comment concerning what a person does is spam
... makes sense to me.
"Edgecrusher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:bqlbf8$245pn2$[email hidden]...
> Spam is anything that has nothing to do with the newsgroup where it wasposted.
>
> --
>
> Steve
>
> "I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and awoman."
>
> A. Schwarzenegger
>
>
> "Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...
> Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. Thedefinition of Spam as I
> understand it is:
> Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as partof a larger collection of
Quoted text (7 lines)
> messages, all having substantially identical content. > Please enlighten me. > > Tks > > >
Don Wilshe wrote:
>
> Ya, but it sells for many millions.. lol
In that case I'm *really* sorry for all the bad things I've said to you
in the past Don :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
Hey Don I have a question for you. I use a deep fryer for cooking and have
some stubborn residual grease that clings to the stainless and worst of all
the plastic controls. I know Gasoline will break down the grease well on the
stainless but I can not get it off the plastic. Any recommendations?
"Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]...
For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got for
developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that are
toxic.
This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and
you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com
===================================================
Dear Mr. Wilshe:
The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a
confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by
1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and
their
proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter
62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain
microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies
petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants.
The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence
dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating that
the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes.
Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the
remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater
criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in Chapter
62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time to
simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum
groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO
Commercial
All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some
time
in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an
ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established
before it is introduced to an aquifer.
Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for
the
composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of the
product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as
general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply with
the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories, each
of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that the
bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know whether
there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each
category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made
by
the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given.
pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner
concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection,
the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, which is
not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water
standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c),
F.A.C.,
applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial
Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a
parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard;
(b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with pH;
and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH.
62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical
species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in
the
current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant
cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby
vouches
that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will exceed
its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate is
mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary fluid
to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO
Commercial
All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations
of
total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will
exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed
the
5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L minimum
groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777,
F.A.C.
The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and
instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page
www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of
discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner
can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation.
FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical
species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the
U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that is
often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States"
(EAFUS).
The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary
identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate
that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical species in
the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
(ppm).
Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low
concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum Storage
Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
environmental
concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and chemical
species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or
environmental
issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may
have
to be developed and imposed.
For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing ECCO
Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
the
fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is proprietary,
it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength)
and
provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure
regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the Department.
Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also
the
supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
surfactant
is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy
of
this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan.
Sincerely,
Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach
Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader
Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems
Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6
Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
10200 Betsy Parkway
St. James City, Florida 33956
http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
Email: [email hidden]
888 578 9600
FAx: 888 485-8765
USA: 239 283-1222
--
Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
10200 Betsy Parkway
St. James City, Florida 33956
http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
Email: [email hidden]
888 578 9600
FAx: 888 485-8765
USA: 239 283-1222
Hey if anyone is curious this is what I do. http://www.fullerbrushbiz.com/
Just kidding of course. I don't wanna work, I just wanna bang on the pedals
all day. Call the SPAM police!
"Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]...
For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got for
developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that are
toxic.
This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and
you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com
===================================================
Dear Mr. Wilshe:
The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a
confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by
1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and
their
proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter
62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain
microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies
petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants.
The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence
dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating that
the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes.
Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the
remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater
criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in Chapter
62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time to
simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum
groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO
Commercial
All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some
time
in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an
ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established
before it is introduced to an aquifer.
Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for
the
composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of the
product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as
general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply with
the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories, each
of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that the
bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know whether
there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each
category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made
by
the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given.
pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner
concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection,
the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, which is
not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water
standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c),
F.A.C.,
applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial
Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a
parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard;
(b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with pH;
and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH.
62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical
species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in
the
current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant
cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby
vouches
that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will exceed
its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate is
mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary fluid
to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO
Commercial
All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations
of
total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will
exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed
the
5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L minimum
groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777,
F.A.C.
The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and
instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page
www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of
discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose
Cleaner
can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation.
FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical
species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the
U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that is
often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States"
(EAFUS).
The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary
identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate
that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical species in
the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
(ppm).
Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low
concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum Storage
Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
environmental
concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and chemical
species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or
environmental
issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may
have
to be developed and imposed.
For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing ECCO
Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
the
fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is proprietary,
it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All
Purpose
Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength)
and
provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure
regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the Department.
Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also
the
supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
surfactant
is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy
of
this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan.
Sincerely,
Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach
Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader
Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems
Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6
Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
10200 Betsy Parkway
St. James City, Florida 33956
http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
Email: [email hidden]
888 578 9600
FAx: 888 485-8765
USA: 239 283-1222
--
Donald R. Wilshe, CEO
1st Enviro Safety, Inc.
10200 Betsy Parkway
St. James City, Florida 33956
http://www.1stenvirosafety.com
Email: [email hidden]
888 578 9600
FAx: 888 485-8765
USA: 239 283-1222
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
I'm not, and I'm not through....
Quoted text (19 lines)
> > > Don Wilshe wrote: > > > > Ya, but it sells for many millions.. lol > > In that case I'm *really* sorry for all the bad things I've said to you > in the past Don :-) > > > Beers and cheers > (uncle) Goy > "goyl at nettx dot no" > > http://www.theuspits.com > > "A man is only as old as the woman he feels........" > --Groucho Marx-- >
"John Simmons" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
I hope not john you work for free as my PR man...lol
Don
Quoted text (9 lines)
> In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says... > > > > > > Don Wilshe wrote: > > > > > > Ya, but it sells for many millions.. lol > > > > I'm not, and I'm not through....Let me send you a pint of military strength degreaser free..
Don
888 578 9600 i ll need an address..
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8jszb.20778$[email hidden]...
> Hey Don I have a question for you. I use a deep fryer for cooking and have
> some stubborn residual grease that clings to the stainless and worst ofall
> the plastic controls. I know Gasoline will break down the grease well onthe
for
>
> developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils thatare
Purpose
that
Chapter
>
> 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
>
> concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this timeto
the
with
>
> the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories,each
>
> of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information thatthe
>
> bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will knowwhether
injection,
>
> the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, whichis
pH;
exceed
>
> its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
>
> one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrateis
>
> mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
>
> Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietaryfluid
minimum
is
in
Storage
>
> Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
> environmental
>
> concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients andchemical
ECCO
>
> Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
> the
>
> fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition isproprietary,
Department.
Quoted text (8 lines)
> stainless but I can not get it off the plastic. Any recommendations? > > > > > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]... > For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just gotQuoted text (24 lines)
> toxic. > > This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and > > you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com > > > > > > =================================================== > > Dear Mr. Wilshe: > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a > > confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by > > 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and > their > > proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial AllQuoted text (14 lines)
> > Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter > > 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain > > microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies > > petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants. > > > > The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence > > dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicatingQuoted text (10 lines)
> > the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose > > Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes. > > Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the > > remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater > > criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing inQuoted text (22 lines)
> > > simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum > > groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO > Commercial > > All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some > time > > in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an > > ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established > > before it is introduced to an aquifer. > > > > Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for > the > > composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects ofQuoted text (7 lines)
> > product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as > > general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to complyQuoted text (18 lines)
> > there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each > > category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or > > parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground > > injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made > by > > the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given. > > > > > pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner > > concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior toQuoted text (13 lines)
> > not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water > > standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c), > F.A.C., > > applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial > > Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a > > parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard; > > (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated withQuoted text (16 lines)
> > and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH. > > > > 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in > the > > current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant > > cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby > vouches > > that the injected concentration of neither of these two species willQuoted text (17 lines)
> > to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO > Commercial > > All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations > of > > total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will > > exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and > > 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must > > therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed > the > > 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/LQuoted text (21 lines)
> > groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777, > F.A.C. > > The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and > > instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page > > www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of > > discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose > Cleaner > > can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation. > > FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the > U.S. > > Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database thatQuoted text (11 lines)
> > often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States" > (EAFUS). > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary > > identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate > > that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical speciesQuoted text (7 lines)
> > the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million > (ppm). > > Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low > > concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of PetroleumQuoted text (12 lines)
> > species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or > environmental > > issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may > have > > to be developed and imposed. > > > > For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposingQuoted text (12 lines)
> > it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength) > and > > provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure > > > > regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to theQuoted text (61 lines)
> > Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also > the > > supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the > surfactant > > is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy > of > > this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan. > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach > > Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader > > Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems > > Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > 10200 Betsy Parkway > St. James City, Florida 33956 > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > Email: [email hidden] > 888 578 9600 > FAx: 888 485-8765 > USA: 239 283-1222 > > -- > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > 10200 Betsy Parkway > St. James City, Florida 33956 > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > Email: [email hidden] > 888 578 9600 > FAx: 888 485-8765 > USA: 239 283-1222 > > >I mfg most all of what you sell.. They meet the new Governement standards
for
bio based products. My carpet cleaner excells....
Don
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Bnszb.20781$[email hidden]...
> Hey if anyone is curious this is what I do. http://www.fullerbrushbiz.com/
> Just kidding of course. I don't wanna work, I just wanna bang on thepedals
> all day. Call the SPAM police!
>
>
> "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]...
> For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just gotfor
>
> developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils thatare
Purpose
that
Chapter
>
> 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
>
> concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this timeto
the
with
>
> the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories,each
>
> of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information thatthe
>
> bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will knowwhether
injection,
>
> the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, whichis
pH;
exceed
>
> its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
>
> one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrateis
>
> mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
>
> Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietaryfluid
minimum
is
in
Storage
>
> Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
> environmental
>
> concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients andchemical
ECCO
>
> Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
> the
>
> fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition isproprietary,
Department.
Quoted text (24 lines)
> toxic. > > This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and > > you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com > > > > > > =================================================== > > Dear Mr. Wilshe: > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a > > confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by > > 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and > their > > proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial AllQuoted text (14 lines)
> > Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter > > 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain > > microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies > > petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants. > > > > The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence > > dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicatingQuoted text (10 lines)
> > the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose > > Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes. > > Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the > > remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater > > criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing inQuoted text (21 lines)
> > simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum > > groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO > Commercial > > All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some > time > > in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an > > ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established > > before it is introduced to an aquifer. > > > > Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for > the > > composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects ofQuoted text (7 lines)
> > product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as > > general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to complyQuoted text (18 lines)
> > there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each > > category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or > > parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground > > injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made > by > > the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given. > > > > > pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner > > concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior toQuoted text (13 lines)
> > not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water > > standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c), > F.A.C., > > applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial > > Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a > > parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard; > > (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated withQuoted text (16 lines)
> > and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH. > > > > 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in > the > > current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant > > cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby > vouches > > that the injected concentration of neither of these two species willQuoted text (17 lines)
> > to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO > Commercial > > All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations > of > > total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will > > exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and > > 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must > > therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed > the > > 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/LQuoted text (21 lines)
> > groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777, > F.A.C. > > The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and > > instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page > > www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of > > discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose > Cleaner > > can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation. > > FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the > U.S. > > Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database thatQuoted text (11 lines)
> > often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States" > (EAFUS). > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary > > identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate > > that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical speciesQuoted text (7 lines)
> > the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million > (ppm). > > Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low > > concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of PetroleumQuoted text (12 lines)
> > species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or > environmental > > issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may > have > > to be developed and imposed. > > > > For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposingQuoted text (12 lines)
> > it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength) > and > > provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure > > > > regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to theQuoted text (61 lines)
> > Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also > the > > supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the > surfactant > > is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy > of > > this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan. > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach > > Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader > > Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems > > Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > 10200 Betsy Parkway > St. James City, Florida 33956 > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > Email: [email hidden] > 888 578 9600 > FAx: 888 485-8765 > USA: 239 283-1222 > > -- > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > 10200 Betsy Parkway > St. James City, Florida 33956 > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > Email: [email hidden] > 888 578 9600 > FAx: 888 485-8765 > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > Thanks Don I have yet to find a degreaser with the strength of gas.
"Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:tQtzb.2846$[email hidden]...
Let me send you a pint of military strength degreaser free..
Don
888 578 9600 i ll need an address..
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8jszb.20778$[email hidden]...
> Hey Don I have a question for you. I use a deep fryer for cooking and have
> some stubborn residual grease that clings to the stainless and worst ofall
> the plastic controls. I know Gasoline will break down the grease well onthe
for
>
> developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils thatare
Purpose
that
Chapter
>
> 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental
>
> concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this timeto
the
with
>
> the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories,each
>
> of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information thatthe
>
> bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will knowwhether
injection,
>
> the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72, whichis
pH;
exceed
>
> its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when
>
> one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrateis
>
> mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection.
>
> Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietaryfluid
minimum
is
in
Storage
>
> Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and
> environmental
>
> concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients andchemical
ECCO
>
> Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and composition of
> the
>
> fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition isproprietary,
Department.
Quoted text (8 lines)
> stainless but I can not get it off the plastic. Any recommendations? > > > > > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]... > For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just gotQuoted text (24 lines)
> toxic. > > This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and > > you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com > > > > > > =================================================== > > Dear Mr. Wilshe: > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a > > confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by > > 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and > their > > proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial AllQuoted text (14 lines)
> > Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant to Chapter > > 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain > > microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies > > petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants. > > > > The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplemental correspondence > > dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicatingQuoted text (10 lines)
> > the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial All Purpose > > Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediation purposes. > > Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the > > remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater > > criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing inQuoted text (22 lines)
> > > simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum > > groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO > Commercial > > All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some > time > > in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant as an > > ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to be established > > before it is introduced to an aquifer. > > > > Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouches for > the > > composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects ofQuoted text (7 lines)
> > product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as > > general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to complyQuoted text (18 lines)
> > there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, for each > > category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or > > parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground > > injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgment made > by > > the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given. > > > > > pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner > > concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior toQuoted text (13 lines)
> > not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water > > standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c), > F.A.C., > > applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approved Remedial > > Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a > > parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard; > > (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated withQuoted text (16 lines)
> > and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH. > > > > 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietary chemical > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listed in > the > > current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant > > cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby > vouches > > that the injected concentration of neither of these two species willQuoted text (17 lines)
> > to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO > Commercial > > All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, the concentrations > of > > total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogen will > > exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and > > 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must > > therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarily exceed > the > > 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/LQuoted text (21 lines)
> > groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777, > F.A.C. > > The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and > > instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page > > www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zone of > > discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose > Cleaner > > can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation. > > FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients or chemical > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the > U.S. > > Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database thatQuoted text (11 lines)
> > often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States" > (EAFUS). > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging the proprietary > > identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like to indicate > > that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemical speciesQuoted text (7 lines)
> > the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million > (ppm). > > Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in such low > > concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of PetroleumQuoted text (12 lines)
> > species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or > environmental > > issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may > have > > to be developed and imposed. > > > > For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposingQuoted text (12 lines)
> > it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volume strength) > and > > provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure > > > > regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to theQuoted text (61 lines)
> > Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure and also > the > > supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the > surfactant > > is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and a copy > of > > this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan. > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach > > Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader > > Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems > > Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > 10200 Betsy Parkway > St. James City, Florida 33956 > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > Email: [email hidden] > 888 578 9600 > FAx: 888 485-8765 > USA: 239 283-1222 > > -- > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > 10200 Betsy Parkway > St. James City, Florida 33956 > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > Email: [email hidden] > 888 578 9600 > FAx: 888 485-8765 > USA: 239 283-1222 > > >In article <bqlbf8$245pn2$[email hidden]>, "Edgecrusher"
<[email hidden]> writes:
>Spam is anything that has nothing to do with the newsgroup where it was
>posted.
That would probably be about 40% of the messages in ANY newsgroup...
Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Yup, but people usually let ity go unless they are trying to sell something, advertising or trying
to make money.
--
Steve
"I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and a woman."
A. Schwarzenegger
"EldredP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> In article <bqlbf8$245pn2$[email hidden]>, "Edgecrusher"
> <[email hidden]> writes:
>
> >Spam is anything that has nothing to do with the newsgroup where it was
> >posted.
>
> That would probably be about 40% of the messages in ANY newsgroup...
>
> Eldred
> --
> Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> Member
> Screamers Racing League
> IICC League
> GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
> ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
> Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
> N2k3 rank:in progress
>
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Cleaners and degreasers are rated with a KB measurement. Most cleaners
are rated around 100 as measured by the Univ of Mass. Ours is over
1000... Keep it away from pee pee.. might disappear.. it was sent today
don
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:lDxzb.27424$[email hidden]...
have
Chapter
correspondence
> >
> > dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating
> that
> >
> > the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial AllPurpose
> >
> > Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediationpurposes.
an
> >
> > ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to beestablished
> >
> > before it is introduced to an aquifer.
> >
> >
> >
> > Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouchesfor
each
> >
> > category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
> >
> > parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
> >
> > injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgmentmade
which
Remedial
chemical
> >
> > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listedin
concentrations
> > of
> >
> > total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogenwill
> >
> > exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
> >
> > 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
> >
> > therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarilyexceed
of
chemical
proprietary
> >
> > identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like toindicate
> >
> > that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemicalspecies
> in
> >
> > the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
> > (ppm).
> >
> > Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in suchlow
of
strength)
also
> > the
> >
> > supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
> > surfactant
> >
> > is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and acopy
Quoted text (14 lines)
> Thanks Don I have yet to find a degreaser with the strength of gas. > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:tQtzb.2846$[email hidden]... > Let me send you a pint of military strength degreaser free.. > > Don > > 888 578 9600 i ll need an address.. > > > > "Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:8jszb.20778$[email hidden]... > > Hey Don I have a question for you. I use a deep fryer for cooking andQuoted text (43 lines)
> > some stubborn residual grease that clings to the stainless and worst of > all > > the plastic controls. I know Gasoline will break down the grease well on > the > > stainless but I can not get it off the plastic. Any recommendations? > > > > > > > > > > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]... > > For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got > for > > > > developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that > are > > toxic. > > > > This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and > > > > you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com > > > > > > > > > > > > =================================================== > > > > Dear Mr. Wilshe: > > > > > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a > > > > confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by > > > > 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and > > their > > > > proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > > > Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant toQuoted text (10 lines)
> > > > 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain > > > > microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies > > > > petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants. > > > > > > > > The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplementalQuoted text (23 lines)
> > > > Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the > > > > remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater > > > > criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in > Chapter > > > > 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental > > > > concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time > to > > > > > > simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum > > > > groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO > > Commercial > > > > All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some > > time > > > > in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant asQuoted text (23 lines)
> > the > > > > composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of > the > > > > product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as > > > > general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All > > Purpose > > > > Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply > with > > > > the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories, > each > > > > of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that > the > > > > bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know > whether > > > > there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, forQuoted text (13 lines)
> > by > > > > the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given. > > > > > > > > > > pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner > > > > concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to > injection, > > > > the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72,Quoted text (8 lines)
> is > > > > not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water > > > > standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c), > > F.A.C., > > > > applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approvedQuoted text (13 lines)
> > > > Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a > > > > parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard; > > > > (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with > pH; > > > > and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH. > > > > > > > > 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietaryQuoted text (24 lines)
> > the > > > > current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant > > > > cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby > > vouches > > > > that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will > exceed > > > > its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when > > > > one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate > is > > > > mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection. > > > > Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary > fluid > > > > to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO > > Commercial > > > > All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, theQuoted text (13 lines)
> > the > > > > 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L > minimum > > > > groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777, > > F.A.C. > > > > The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and > > > > instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page > > > > www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zoneQuoted text (7 lines)
> > > > discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose > > Cleaner > > > > can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation. > > > > FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients orQuoted text (13 lines)
> > > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the > > U.S. > > > > Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that > is > > > > often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States" > > (EAFUS). > > > > > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging theQuoted text (24 lines)
> > > > concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum > Storage > > > > Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and > > environmental > > > > concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and > chemical > > > > species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or > > environmental > > > > issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may > > have > > > > to be developed and imposed. > > > > > > > > For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing > ECCO > > > > Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and compositionQuoted text (9 lines)
> > the > > > > fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is > proprietary, > > > > it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All > > Purpose > > > > Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volumeQuoted text (10 lines)
> > and > > > > provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure > > > > > > > > regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the > Department. > > > > Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure andQuoted text (56 lines)
> > of > > > > this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach > > > > Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader > > > > Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems > > > > Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > > 10200 Betsy Parkway > > St. James City, Florida 33956 > > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > > Email: [email hidden] > > 888 578 9600 > > FAx: 888 485-8765 > > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > > 10200 Betsy Parkway > > St. James City, Florida 33956 > > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > > Email: [email hidden] > > 888 578 9600 > > FAx: 888 485-8765 > > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > > > > > > >Thanks Don I am looking forward to finding a product that can actually do
what I want without excessive scrubbing and time. At this point I have
considered just throwing the fryer out and buying a new one. Wonder if it
will also remove that old dry black grease on cookware that my wife thinks
the dishwasher will take care of. LOL
"Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:_7Nzb.3810$[email hidden]...
Cleaners and degreasers are rated with a KB measurement. Most cleaners
are rated around 100 as measured by the Univ of Mass. Ours is over
1000... Keep it away from pee pee.. might disappear.. it was sent today
don
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:lDxzb.27424$[email hidden]...
have
Chapter
correspondence
> >
> > dated September 18, 2003 from 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, indicating
> that
> >
> > the surfactant ingredient will be omitted from ECCO Commercial AllPurpose
> >
> > Cleaner that is marketed in Florida for groundwater remediationpurposes.
an
> >
> > ingredient, then minimum groundwater criteria will have to beestablished
> >
> > before it is introduced to an aquifer.
> >
> >
> >
> > Having reviewed the confidential disclosure, the bureau hereby vouchesfor
each
> >
> > category, the bureau has either indicated why a particular ingredient or
> >
> > parameter is a concern (or is not a concern) with respect to underground
> >
> > injection control regulations. If in any category there is a judgmentmade
which
Remedial
chemical
> >
> > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner that are listedin
concentrations
> > of
> >
> > total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and ammonia nitrogenwill
> >
> > exceed their respective minimum groundwater criteria of 5,000 and
> >
> > 2,800 micrograms per liter (ug/L). 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated must
> >
> > therefore petition for a zone of discharge variance to temporarilyexceed
of
chemical
proprietary
> >
> > identity of these ingredients and chemical species, would like toindicate
> >
> > that the magnitude of the concentration of each of these chemicalspecies
> in
> >
> > the fluid to be injected is not greater than five (5) parts per million
> > (ppm).
> >
> > Given that these ingredients and chemical species are present in suchlow
of
strength)
also
> > the
> >
> > supplemental September 18, 2003 correspondence indicating that the
> > surfactant
> >
> > is omitted from the formulation when it is injected in Florida, and acopy
Quoted text (14 lines)
> Thanks Don I have yet to find a degreaser with the strength of gas. > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:tQtzb.2846$[email hidden]... > Let me send you a pint of military strength degreaser free.. > > Don > > 888 578 9600 i ll need an address.. > > > > "Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:8jszb.20778$[email hidden]... > > Hey Don I have a question for you. I use a deep fryer for cooking andQuoted text (43 lines)
> > some stubborn residual grease that clings to the stainless and worst of > all > > the plastic controls. I know Gasoline will break down the grease well on > the > > stainless but I can not get it off the plastic. Any recommendations? > > > > > > > > > > "Don Wilshe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:Yeczb.1833$[email hidden]... > > For Some of you that wonder what i do. Well here is a letter i just got > for > > > > developing Bio Remediation collodial chemistry for Water and Soils that > are > > toxic. > > > > This is from the ole dummy don.. lol Oh yes I own 1st Enviro Safety and > > > > you can visit us at www.1stenvirosafety.com > > > > > > > > > > > > =================================================== > > > > Dear Mr. Wilshe: > > > > > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby acknowledges receipt of a > > > > confidential disclosure dated July 2, 2003, submitted by > > > > 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated, regarding the proprietary ingredients and > > their > > > > proportions in the remediation product known as ECCO Commercial All > Purpose > > > > Cleaner, for petroleum cleanup in groundwater and soil pursuant toQuoted text (10 lines)
> > > > 62-770, F.A.C. ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner does not contain > > > > microorganisms but is rather an organic aqueous solution that emulsifies > > > > petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants. > > > > > > > > The bureau hereby also acknowledges receipt of supplementalQuoted text (23 lines)
> > > > Florida regulations do not prohibit the use of a surfactant for the > > > > remediation of a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, but minimum groundwater > > > > criteria for the surfactant must first be established for listing in > Chapter > > > > 62-777, F.A.C., if the surfactant is of toxicological or environmental > > > > concern. It was the choice of 1st EnviroSafety Incorporated at this time > to > > > > > > simply omit the surfactant as an ingredient, rather than have minimum > > > > groundwater criteria developed for it, since tests showed that ECCO > > Commercial > > > > All Purpose Cleaner is also effective without the surfactant. If at some > > time > > > > in the future there is a desire to once again include the surfactant asQuoted text (23 lines)
> > the > > > > composition of the product. Without divulging any proprietary aspects of > the > > > > product, we provide the minimum amount of necessary information -- in as > > > > general terms as possible -- to potential users of ECCO Commercial All > > Purpose > > > > Cleaner and reviewers of plans proposing it in order for them to comply > with > > > > the regulations that apply. This is done below for four (4) categories, > each > > > > of which is labeled in bold-faced type. By reading the information that > the > > > > bureau has provided for each category, users and reviewers will know > whether > > > > there is an obligation to comply with a regulation. Additionally, forQuoted text (13 lines)
> > by > > > > the bureau, then an explanation or a rationale is given. > > > > > > > > > > pH. When one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner > > > > concentrate is mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to > injection, > > > > the resulting pH of the fluid to be injected is approximately 9.72,Quoted text (8 lines)
> is > > > > not within the 6.5 to 8.5-range required by the secondary drinking water > > > > standards of Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Therefore, rule 62-522.300(2)(c), > > F.A.C., > > > > applies. In order to comply with this rule a Department-approvedQuoted text (13 lines)
> > > > Action Plan must: (a) identify the pH of the fluid to be injected as a > > > > parameter that does not meet its secondary drinking water standard; > > > > (b) specify the size and duration of a zone of discharge associated with > pH; > > > > and (c) propose groundwater monitoring of pH. > > > > > > > > 62-777, F.A.C.-listed chemical species. There are two proprietaryQuoted text (24 lines)
> > the > > > > current August 5, 1999 issue of Chapter 62-777, F.A.C., for contaminant > > > > cleanup target levels. The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems hereby > > vouches > > > > that the injected concentration of neither of these two species will > exceed > > > > its respective minimum groundwater set forth in that chapter when > > > > one (1) volume of liquid ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner concentrate > is > > > > mixed with fifteen (15) volumes of water prior to injection. > > > > Ammonia Nitrogen and TRPH. Per laboratory analysis of the proprietary > fluid > > > > to be injected at a concentration of one (1) volume of liquid ECCO > > Commercial > > > > All Purpose Cleaner with fifteen (15) volumes of water, theQuoted text (13 lines)
> > the > > > > 5,000 ug/L minimum groundwater criterion for TRPH and the 2,800 ug/L > minimum > > > > groundwater criterion for ammonia nitrogen set forth in Chapter 62-777, > > F.A.C. > > > > The petition is for a variance from Rule 62-522.300(3), F.A.C., and > > > > instructions and a petition format can be obtained at web page > > > > www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/pcp/pages/innovative.htm. The zoneQuoted text (7 lines)
> > > > discharge variance must be granted before ECCO Commercial All Purpose > > Cleaner > > > > can be injected for the purpose of in situ aquifer remediation. > > > > FDA EAFUS-listed ingredients. Several proprietary ingredients orQuoted text (13 lines)
> > > > species present in ECCO Commercial All Purpose Cleaner are listed in the > > U.S. > > > > Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food additive inventory database that > is > > > > often referred to as "Everything Added to Food in the United States" > > (EAFUS). > > > > > > > > The Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems, without divulging theQuoted text (24 lines)
> > > > concentrations, and listed in EAFUS as well, the Bureau of Petroleum > Storage > > > > Systems judges that they should be of minimal toxicological and > > environmental > > > > concern. However, should the EAFUS status of these ingredients and > chemical > > > > species change in the future, or should a valid toxicological or > > environmental > > > > issue be raised about any of them, then minimum groundwater criteria may > > have > > > > to be developed and imposed. > > > > > > > > For underground injection control purposes, remediation plans proposing > ECCO > > > > Commercial All Purpose Cleaner must provide the volume and compositionQuoted text (9 lines)
> > the > > > > fluid to be injected into an aquifer. Since the composition is > proprietary, > > > > it will suffice to indicate the overall volume of ECCO Commercial All > > Purpose > > > > Cleaner solution to be injected (at the 15:1 dilution by volumeQuoted text (10 lines)
> > and > > > > provide a footnote indicating that a one-time confidential disclosure > > > > > > > > regarding the proprietary composition has been submitted to the > Department. > > > > Reference should be made to the original July 2, 2003 disclosure andQuoted text (56 lines)
> > of > > > > this voucher should be included as an appendix in the plan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Rick Ruscito, P.E. Rebecca S. Lockenbach > > > > Ecology and Environment, Inc. FDEP Section Leader > > > > Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems > > > > Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 Petroleum Cleanup Section 6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > > 10200 Betsy Parkway > > St. James City, Florida 33956 > > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > > Email: [email hidden] > > 888 578 9600 > > FAx: 888 485-8765 > > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Donald R. Wilshe, CEO > > 1st Enviro Safety, Inc. > > 10200 Betsy Parkway > > St. James City, Florida 33956 > > http://www.1stenvirosafety.com > > Email: [email hidden] > > 888 578 9600 > > FAx: 888 485-8765 > > USA: 239 283-1222 > > > > > > > > >
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:HM%zb.8463$[email hidden]...
> Thanks Don I am looking forward to finding a product that can actually do
> what I want without excessive scrubbing and time. At this point I have
> considered just throwing the fryer out and buying a new one. Wonder if it
> will also remove that old dry black grease on cookware that my wife thinks
> the dishwasher will take care of. LOL
You might want to invest in a degreaser for your arteries as well.
Kyle
Thanks Kyle! I do have a cleanser for my arteries. It is called Glenlivet.
Bye the way are you the Kyle from South Park? Cool!
"Kyle Roberts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:yp5Ab.244$%[email hidden]...
"Tiny Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:HM%zb.8463$[email hidden]...
> Thanks Don I am looking forward to finding a product that can actually do
> what I want without excessive scrubbing and time. At this point I have
> considered just throwing the fryer out and buying a new one. Wonder if it
> will also remove that old dry black grease on cookware that my wife thinks
> the dishwasher will take care of. LOL
You might want to invest in a degreaser for your arteries as well.
Kyle
Eltigre,
There are a few things which categorize this as spam.
1. It has nothing to do with rec.autos.simulators
2. It was completely unsolicited.
3. The poster is advertising himself or business, which has nothing to do with the topic.
...and did you read that garbage? I would rather see a spam like, "Hi, I'm Bambi...come see my pics" then that microbiological misfit posting that crap here again!
-Tim
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. The definition of Spam as I understand it is:
Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially identical content.
Please enlighten me.
Tks
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8Xdzb.287288$ao4.1003987@attbi_s51...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Please don't spam this newsgroup. > > You have been reported. > > [email hidden] > > >Tim, in a post on this ng his (Don Wilshe's) profession, age and economic status were questioned. He didn't initiate the post(s), he responded to them.
I wasn't agreeing nor disagreeing with the content, just pointing out I didn't think that (according to an accepted definition of spam) his response was considered spam.
If it is (considered spam) so too are the post(s) you and I have exchanged.
eL
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:AFwBb.294740$Dw6.988026@attbi_s02...
Eltigre,
There are a few things which categorize this as spam.
1. It has nothing to do with rec.autos.simulators
2. It was completely unsolicited.
3. The poster is advertising himself or business, which has nothing to do with the topic.
...and did you read that garbage? I would rather see a spam like, "Hi, I'm Bambi...come see my pics" then that microbiological misfit posting that crap here again!
-Tim
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. The definition of Spam as I understand it is:
Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially identical content.
Please enlighten me.
Tks
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8Xdzb.287288$ao4.1003987@attbi_s51...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Please don't spam this newsgroup. > > You have been reported. > > [email hidden] > > >That would have been fine if he kept it in the original topic, but he had to go and start a new topic. That is the difference.
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, in a post on this ng his (Don Wilshe's) profession, age and economic status were questioned. He didn't initiate the post(s), he responded to them.
I wasn't agreeing nor disagreeing with the content, just pointing out I didn't think that (according to an accepted definition of spam) his response was considered spam.
If it is (considered spam) so too are the post(s) you and I have exchanged.
eL
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:AFwBb.294740$Dw6.988026@attbi_s02...
Eltigre,
There are a few things which categorize this as spam.
1. It has nothing to do with rec.autos.simulators
2. It was completely unsolicited.
3. The poster is advertising himself or business, which has nothing to do with the topic.
...and did you read that garbage? I would rather see a spam like, "Hi, I'm Bambi...come see my pics" then that microbiological misfit posting that crap here again!
-Tim
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. The definition of Spam as I understand it is:
Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially identical content.
Please enlighten me.
Tks
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8Xdzb.287288$ao4.1003987@attbi_s51...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Please don't spam this newsgroup. > > You have been reported. > > [email hidden] > > >OFF WITH HIS HEAD!
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:mvCCb.532636$Tr4.1460476@attbi_s03...
That would have been fine if he kept it in the original topic, but he had to go and start a new topic. That is the difference.
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, in a post on this ng his (Don Wilshe's) profession, age and economic status were questioned. He didn't initiate the post(s), he responded to them.
I wasn't agreeing nor disagreeing with the content, just pointing out I didn't think that (according to an accepted definition of spam) his response was considered spam.
If it is (considered spam) so too are the post(s) you and I have exchanged.
eL
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:AFwBb.294740$Dw6.988026@attbi_s02...
Eltigre,
There are a few things which categorize this as spam.
1. It has nothing to do with rec.autos.simulators
2. It was completely unsolicited.
3. The poster is advertising himself or business, which has nothing to do with the topic.
...and did you read that garbage? I would rather see a spam like, "Hi, I'm Bambi...come see my pics" then that microbiological misfit posting that crap here again!
-Tim
"Eltigre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Tim, what am I missing. How is this response construed as spam. The definition of Spam as I understand it is:
Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially identical content.
Please enlighten me.
Tks
"Tim Miser" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8Xdzb.287288$ao4.1003987@attbi_s51...
