Damn. Michael Schumacher's chances must surely be over now, for 1999, and for
Ferrai. Eddie Irvine does a good job, but without Schumacher, Ferrari cannot
realistically take on Mclaren. Hopefully Coulthard can continue his current
form and make a fight out of this years championship.
It's wouldn't be impossible for Hakkinen to retire from the next few races and
score nothing before Schumacher is fit enough to return though, would it? :-)
Maybe Irvine can run him off the road...<G>
Rob Swindells
4th in Goldline Bearing FFord Championship (12 Points);
8 points behined Championship Leader (as of round 3 of 6)
Michael Schumacher breaks his leg at Silverstone
Posters reacted to Michael Schumacher's crash at the 1999 British Grand Prix, in which he broke his right leg, and its effect on the championship. They debated the cause, citing Ferrari's statement about rear brake failure versus a stuck throttle or steering failure, and argued about Irvine's slow pit stop. Others objected to the unmarked spoiler.
real motorsportoff-topic
Automated summary.
It's far too soon to say that he'll be out of the car in two weeks at
Austria.
I suspect that with braces or a cast of some sort he would be able to drive,
but if he had another crash, then what? So we'll have to wait and see.
His right leg was broken in two places, and he's gone in for surgery
already, so perhaps by this time next week a decision can be made....
> Eddie Irvine does a good job, but without Schumacher, Ferrari cannot
> realistically take on Mclaren.
Irvine would have had Coultard for lunch if his fuel man wouldn't have
taken 7 seconds to get the hose connected! That cost him the race today.
As for future events, you may be correct...
David L. Cook
Does someone allready know what kind of technical failure Schumacher
had? There were different stories about this...
Andre
Quoted text (8 lines)
>> Eddie Irvine does a good job, but without Schumacher, Ferrari cannot >> realistically take on Mclaren. >Irvine would have had Coultard for lunch if his fuel man wouldn't have >taken 7 seconds to get the hose connected! That cost him the race today. >As for future events, you may be correct... >David L. CookCue a spoiler notation whine.... <g>
Jan.
------
Here in Austria they said that the gas pedal probably got stuck at full
speed... but they don't know either.
Dex
I've also heard that his steering failed, although it wouldn't had made any
difference at that speed anyway, not in the g/t.
I think he just locked up - even Schumacher makes mistakes.
Quoted text (21 lines)
> Does someone allready know what kind of technical failure Schumacher > had? There were different stories about this... > Andre > >> Eddie Irvine does a good job, but without Schumacher, Ferrari cannot > >> realistically take on Mclaren. > >Irvine would have had Coultard for lunch if his fuel man wouldn't have > >taken 7 seconds to get the hose connected! That cost him the race today. > >As for future events, you may be correct... > >David L. CookOh ***! Frightfully sorry. I've never done that before. I must be PUNISHED.
Punsih me. Please.
Can someone punish me?
Rob Swindells
4th in Goldline Bearing FFord Championship (12 Points);
8 points behined Championship Leader (as of round 3 of 6)
That was what it looked like to me. But here in Sweden they seem to think it
was the rear brakes failing. I've heard people say the steering broke too...
Either way, it is very bad for Formula One... :((
-- Roland
The rear tires were clearly still running at full force, when his fronts
were locked up, which would be an indication that the throttle stuck wide
open...
> > Here in Austria they said that the gas pedal probably got stuck at full
> >speed... but they don't know either.
> That was what it looked like to me. But here in Sweden they seem to think it
> was the rear brakes failing. I've heard people say the steering broke too...
Here in Holland, they said they had confirmation from Ferrari that the
steering was OK. The rearwheels were still turning when the frontwheels
were already locked. So it seems that either the rear brakes failed or the
throttle was stuck. IMO, if it was only the rear brakes refused, the front
brakes should be able to decrease speed consideravly, which was not the
case. For me, this leaves a defective throttle linkage as the most
probable cause of the accident.
Anyway, I am curious:
1. who will be in the Ferrari***pit in the German GP. My guess is that
they borrow Trulli from Prost. If he does a good job, he might replace
Irvine next year
2. if Irvine will be supported in the title hunt when he has a 15-point
lead over Schumacher when Schumacher returns
3.what kind of new safety-regulations will be anounced.
grtngs,
hgrm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Han Monsees
Ornstein Laboratorium kamer 028
tel: 030-2532328
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charlie was a chemist,
but Charlie is no more.
For what he thought was H2O,
was H2SO4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jean Todt said the rear brakes didn't work.
My question is why didn't he downshift to slow down or even blow the engine?
Sure it costs money, but if you can't slow what else can you do other than hit
a wall? I would rather ruin an engine, hitting a wall head-on at 230kmph just
is pretty freaky.
> Does someone allready know what kind of technical failure Schumacher
> had? There were different stories about this...
> Andre
--
Jon Van Ginneken
"I try to do my best every day. If, at the end of the day
I know I did the best job I could do, I am satisfied."
--Alex Zanardi
punish!
Punish!
PUNISH!
PUUUNIIISHH!!!!!
So you don't belive in good and bad things?
It's all the same?
Bullshit!
This is like saying it doesn't matter if it's Grand Prix Legends of Official
Formula 1 I am playing!
Borut
full
> > >speed... but they don't know either.
> > That was what it looked like to me. But here in Sweden they seem to think
Quoted text (10 lines)
> Why is it "very bad for Formula One"? > For F1 in general or for the fact that he (Schumacher) will be out of > several races and therefore has no chance of winning the Championship? > In either case....that's life. It's neither good nor bad, just "is". > > > Here in Austria they said that the gas pedal probably got stuck atQuoted text (7 lines)
> it > > was the rear brakes failing. I've heard people say the steering broke > too... > > Either way, it is very bad for Formula One... :(( > > -- Rolandyes, Schumacher makes mistakes but not this one!
Borut
Count the time from front brakes locking until the impact and you'll notice
that poor Schumy didn't have that much time to think, I think its about 2
seconds.
140mph -> 0mph in about 2 seconds...thank god for that tyre wall, i hate to
think what we would have seen happen if the tyres weren't there, he was very
lucky to get away with those 'minor' injuries (Minor compared to losing your
legs, you can fix a broken leg).
> Jean Todt said the rear brakes didn't work.
> My question is why didn't he downshift to slow down or even blow the engine?
> Sure it costs money, but if you can't slow what else can you do other than hit
> a wall? I would rather ruin an engine, hitting a wall head-on at 230kmph just
Quoted text (18 lines)
> is pretty freaky. > > Does someone allready know what kind of technical failure Schumacher > > had? There were different stories about this... > > Andre > -- > Jon Van Ginneken > "I try to do my best every day. If, at the end of the day > I know I did the best job I could do, I am satisfied." > --Alex ZanardiWell, it's just a stupid theory by someone who knows exactly nothing about
racing (that's me), but anyways that's my theory:
When you watch the replay of the crash from the helicopter cam, you can see
that Schumacher was _very_ close to Irvine's Ferrari (I hope I didn't mix
the names) at the straight, just before he took over. It seems like he
nearly collided with him, what I think would have happened, if Irvine hadn't
pulled to the left and let Schumacher pass.
I think the throttle got stuck before he passed Irvine, but he didn't
realize it at that time.
Right after passing Irvine, he must have noticed, that something wasn't
right, because he locked the wheels _very_ early. I think they normally
start braking at the point where he already locked, so he must have noticed
it long before.
Well, that's my theory, it's probably all wrong, but for me it's reasonable.
BTW, I don't think that the steering broke, because here in Austria they
said that he didn't turn the wheels to avoid rolling over, although I don't
think that that would have happened, and if, it would have been less
dangerous, because there wouldn't have been such a hard impact.
All in all, I'm very interested about what Schumacher will tell us about
the crash when he has recovered....
Greets!
Dex
Personally I think *any* crash where a driver is injured is very bad
for Formula 1.
In this specific case there was a close fight for the championship between
Schumacher and Hakkinen which if Schumacher is out for a few races, Mika will
now runaway with, even today despite Mika's bad luck he was almost a full
second faster than anyone on the track, at least it looks like we will see
a great fight between Coulthart, Irvine and Frentzen.
Just to keep this on topic, wouldn't it be great to run the new Silverstone
configuration in GPL?! there's a section of consecutive fast corners that
looks like it would be a blast with the new FF!
Seeyas on the track.
--John (Joao) Silva
Quoted text (20 lines)
>Why is it "very bad for Formula One"? >For F1 in general or for the fact that he (Schumacher) will be out of >several races and therefore has no chance of winning the Championship? >In either case....that's life. It's neither good nor bad, just "is". >> > Here in Austria they said that the gas pedal probably got stuck at full >> >speed... but they don't know either. >> That was what it looked like to me. But here in Sweden they seem to think >it >> was the rear brakes failing. I've heard people say the steering broke >too... >> Either way, it is very bad for Formula One... :(( >> -- RolandHardly seven seconds - one or two maybe, and that because Irvine
messed up and overshot his mark. In any case Coulthard was easily the
quicker in the final stint and could adjust the gap at will.
Cheers!
John
Why is it "very bad for Formula One"?
For F1 in general or for the fact that he (Schumacher) will be out of
several races and therefore has no chance of winning the Championship?
In either case....that's life. It's neither good nor bad, just "is".
John,
I watched the replay. It took 7 seconds for them to get the fuel hose
on. I think the total stop was something like 12 seconds...
wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)
> >Irvine would have had Coultard for lunch if his fuel man wouldn't have > >taken 7 seconds to get the hose connected! That cost him the race today. > >As for future events, you may be correct... > Hardly seven seconds - one or two maybe, and that because Irvine > messed up and overshot his mark. In any case Coulthard was easily the > quicker in the final stint and could adjust the gap at will. > Cheers! > JohnSorry Rob.... not aimed at you personally, just a jab at the tendencies
within this ng... ;-)
Jan.
------
>Does someone allready know what kind of technical failure Schumacher
>had? There were different stories about this...
Ferrari says it was a failure of rear brakes, but from the camera car,
it is possible to see that Michael turns the wheel, but the front
wheels remain pointed in the straight direction, so it is possible to
think about some kind of steering failure
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Home-page : http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/7917
Il sito di ISF1mod : http://www.blissett.com/isf1/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:39:41 +1000, "Bruce Kennewell"
>Why is it "very bad for Formula One"?
>For F1 in general or for the fact that he (Schumacher) will be out of
>several races and therefore has no chance of winning the Championship?
>In either case....that's life. It's neither good nor bad, just "is".
It is anyway a bad day, for Formula One and for motor races, as it is
for all the times when a driver is injured in an accident. I know it
is a part of the game, but it is always a bad moment when we see this
kind of accidents, no matter which driver is involved.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Home-page : http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/7917
Il sito di ISF1mod : http://www.blissett.com/isf1/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, if the failure was on therear brakes, Schumacher could have put
the car in a spin, to decrease speed, but he couldn't even if he tried
to turn the car for the Stowe, so I think that some failure in the
steering is also possible.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Home-page : http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/7917
Il sito di ISF1mod : http://www.blissett.com/isf1/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------


































