I couldn't agree more. Physics are the most important aspect of a racing
game, especially a rallying sim.
The video you have seen is a very early version, when the physics model was
so underdeveloped it had handling similar to Quake! This explains the 'on
rails' feeling when watching the footage.
IRC was a huge dissapointment, I brought it for 40 and sold it 2 weeks
later for 15!
This is a quote from a Mag Fields employee from y site forum :
"We won't be releasing anything until the physics are spot on - we know what
went wrong with IRC and we know which games we need to beat.
We have BRC drivers lineing up to test drive the physics and force feedback
for us, so the car feel should be perfect".
I will not by RC if the handling isn't at least as good as CMR, and Magnetic
Fields and Europress should know this. They want to sell as many copies as
possible, and that means beating the competition.
Look and listen to/at the game so far, Surely Mag Fields would not spoil a
game on the last thing we have not seen, would they?
Back to a more graphical note, there are 4 news screenshots on my site now :
[link lost in import]
Cheers :)
Keith Quinton.
>What scares me is that the people who've written this produced the awful RAC
>and International rally championships. They seemed to have this ***ion
>to straight roads, and by the looks of the movie, that doesn't look like
>it's changed - but hear this: I WANT TO BE PROVED WRONG. I'd love a proper
>rally sim.
>The contradiction I've heard regarding it's authenticity is worrying. There
>was an interview at GA-Sports, and though I can't remember it word for word,
>there was one section where the producer (I think) said "The tracks are
>modelled from the real stages of the BRC" then later said "We've got a cool
>track editor that allows us to press a button in the editor and drive the
>course we're working on immediately - if we don't like how it plays we can
>change it and this saves development time". Hmmm, so if the real layout
>doesn't play to the developers liking, they'll make some changes to it? Bet
>Gwyndaf, Martin et al wish they had that power...
>Like I said though, this is one occasion I hope I'm wrong.
>Mark
>Reading, UK