I thought I was the LAST hold out to use MPH instead of TIME! :-) Even I
had to finally make the switch to time cause these numbers are meaningless
when comparing. Especially now on new RC's.
Mitch
"Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:_OEJb.66502$hf1.27447@lakeread06...
> Well, inconsistent as hell, but getting there. The off's are obvious.
>
> SOOOOO close to a 13!
>
> Better times are at the bottom. I was doing some experimenting the first25
Well, inconsistent as hell, but getting there. The off's are obvious.
SOOOOO close to a 13!
Better times are at the bottom. I was doing some experimenting the first 25
or so, so the times suck.?
-:Larry
Track: Kyalami
Date: 01/03/04
Session:
LAP TIME
1 108.872000
2 75.756000
3 75.222000
4 75.612000
5 84.671000
6 --
7 --
8 75.584000
9 75.641000
10 75.264000
11 75.772000
12 75.037000
13 --
14 76.007000
15 75.453000
16 --
17 75.491000
18 75.194000
19 --
20 --
21 76.632000
22 75.075000
23 87.180000
24 --
25 --
26 75.162000
27 75.046000
28 74.929000
29 75.336000
30 74.822000
31 74.725000
32 75.016000
33 74.842000
34 74.130000 So Close!
35 74.754000
36 --
37 75.155000
38 74.805000
39 74.626000
40 74.877000
41 74.754000
42 75.125000
43 74.426000
44 --
45 74.084000
46 81.292000
47 74.164000 SO Close!
48 86.138000
Weather: Clear, 70 �F, North 0 mph
