Any reason for losing 10 fps going from 45.23 drivers to the 55.03 drivers.
It happened with my 4200 and now my FX 5950. I do clean installs of the
drivers but it still happens. I use ogl driving N2003. Anyone find
anything faster then the 45.23's?
i use omega's 44.03s, i found them to be a tad faster than the 45.23s
but not much. however since everything sees to like them,gpl,nascar2k3,
f1cs and all it's mods, i'm sticking with them.
Jeff wrote:
Quoted text (7 lines)
> Any reason for losing 10 fps going from 45.23 drivers to the 55.03 drivers. > It happened with my 4200 and now my FX 5950. I do clean installs of the > drivers but it still happens. I use ogl driving N2003. Anyone find > anything faster then the 45.23's? > > >
"Jeff" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:400497ba$0$12212$[email hidden]...
> Any reason for losing 10 fps going from 45.23 drivers to the 55.03drivers.
> It happened with my 4200 and now my FX 5950. I do clean installs of the
> drivers but it still happens. I use ogl driving N2003. Anyone find
> anything faster then the 45.23's?
>
found the same thing on my gf4. older drivers were better
Steve>
I agree will all the others, newest drivers have more features but I got the
best fps with older one, 30.82 being the best for me on Ti4600. (Newest have
better 3DMark, if we could play that)
I guess the new drivers pushes us to get new CPU/Mobo/RAM to get the same
fps with newer drivers ;-).
"Jeff" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message de news:
400497ba$0$12212$[email hidden]...
> Any reason for losing 10 fps going from 45.23 drivers to the 55.03drivers.
> It happened with my 4200 and now my FX 5950. I do clean installs of the
> drivers but it still happens. I use ogl driving N2003. Anyone find
> anything faster then the 45.23's?
>
>
>
