BRYNICEGUY wrote
Hmm that's not the case on the NROS. Even if the N2 track has different
parameters, the only way to do 125's is to say low, I mean -low- ( ;-D )
all the way in the turns.
And I did some test at Bristol, and with my setups I was able to do an easy
125mph lap with the car staying all the way low on lap 4. If you want the
replay I can upload it it's only 300kb. I did the same with the trucks and
I did after 4 laps a 123.
Stay low at Bristol or your setup is not good.
-= Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
-= NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
-= SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
-= Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
-= May the Downforce be with you...
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
I see a lot of arguements on different message boards about how realistic or
not certain software titles are. Well, Nascar 1999 by Papyrus is not realistic
when it comes to Bristol. Anyone who has ever seen a race at Bristol knows that
you need to stay on the bottom or you go to the back. On N99, the higher grove
is the fast way around the track. This is not realistic; however, I ran a 100
lap truck race today and there were 52 lead changes. 52 lead changes in 100
laps, now that was fun! Remember fun?
Brian
Could you please send me the replay and the setup?
======================
======================
In NASCAR 1999 I ran a 500 lap race at Bristol and had around 88 lead changes.
