Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Gpl Framerates (long)

1 post by 1 person · 19 Feb 1999 - 19 Feb 1999

Todd Siroi 19 Feb 1999#451215
The floating point capability of the older AMDs aren't quite as good as AMD would have liked you to belive.. myself included... that's more of what's bogging it down. If you have an AWE 64 i suggest finding sbwsgupd.exe that should improve gameplay as the AWE 64's older drivers didnt use wavesytnth well in floating point intensive (quake, gpl, etc) games. Floating point, in a nutshell, is the processors ability to do 3d images (in this case basically games) CPUs with better FPL will do better with such games than others... the Cyrix's and AMD's of the world have inferior FPL capabilities than even older INTEL pentium chips. i'm no real intel fan but I'm just telling it like it is... Consider (if money is a problem) picking up a PENTIUM 233mmx chip (mmx doesnt do anything in GPL or most games for that matter) I believe it should run ok on that board... or even a classic P200.... if you know someone who has one borrow his chip and you should see a large difference. I hate to be the bearer or bad news but the AMD's and Cyrix's aren't quite as "competitive" (in the *** market anyway they're PERFECT for usual tasks like web browsing and 2d *** and such). Even the AMD K62's with 3dNow! (again 3dNow does nothing for GPL) have better FPL but still inferior. Again.... if money's a problem but you really wanna upgrade further than a 233 or Intell 200... consider a Celeron...board and chip, quite a bit cheaper than intel's PIIs and.... the performance is virtually identical. Intel is soon going to try to make the celerons worse though cause its seems they made them too good for too cheap :p Hope this helps although I'm sure its not what you wanted to hear... btw.. more ram always helps :) -----Original Message----- Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators Date: Thursday, February 18, 1999 10:46 PM Subject: GPL framerates >I have an AMD K-6 200 with a 4 meg voodoo 1. I didn't expect blinding >performance from this system, but even in trainer mode with everything off but >the track, minimum resolution and sounds, I'm averaging around 30 frames at >Watkins Glen. Is this normal? With so much turned off, I guess I expected a >little better. Training is margional at best, racing is impossible.

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy