Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Celeron for sims

15 posts by 11 people · 30 Dec 1998 - 01 Jan 1999

it's 30 Dec 1998#442559
Is it true that the Celeron can be overclocked from 300 to 450?? I am seriously considering upgrading. The question is: is it worth it to overclock it for racing sims?
Peter H 30 Dec 1998#442560
BOY is it worth it! I have had it for 5 moths now. Asus P2B MB Celeron 300A o/c to 450 at 100mhz 64mb PC100 Ram Had to bump up the voltage on the Celeron from 2.0 to 2.2 for windows to load, added a 3" fan to blow cool air in, and away I went. Abit board is great because you can set the bus speed in the bios but Asus was one little jumper setting that didn't hurt. Make sure you buy the 300A w/ 128k cache.
>Is it true that the Celeron can be overclocked from 300 to 450?? I am >seriously considering upgrading. The question is: is it worth it to >overclock it for racing sims? Man, did YOU open a torrent! I have m300A overclocked to 450 and it runs great. I'd recommend looking at www.tomshardware.com for more definitive info. There's also an ENTIRE newsgroup related to overclocking - search for it with your newsreader. To sum it up: it's the best $300 I ever spent (M/B, CPU, RAM). "Gunner"
>Is it true that the Celeron can be overclocked from 300 to 450?? I am >seriously considering upgrading. The question is: is it worth it to >overclock it for racing sims? I just upgraded, installed it yesterday, putting it through its paces as I write. So, I'll get back to you on this. For now, it's running at 83, but hung at 100 with a scary registry error. I've also had it hang once at 83. Sometimes it might take a while for the chip to "set". And I might have to play with the core voltage. So time will tell. Anyway, it comes down to a large number of people having success taking the Celeron 300a (make sure it's the "a" as it has the 128 kB L2 cache) to 450. But it isn't guaranteed. You'll want the ABit BH6 MB since it has bios soft settings to allow you to change clock and core voltage (2.0 is norm, sometimes 2.1 or 2.2 are req'd for stable oc'ing). Heat is an issue. So, take your chances. What have I seen so far? Well, at the regular 300 (66 MHz bus) setting, it is only about 20% faster than my p200MMX oc'd to 250 (83 MHz bus). Not apples/oranges (BTW, I prefer the former for solid, the latter for juice). But my p200 was rock-solid at 250, and I hope my Celeron is the same at 450. If it isn't, I upgraded for little reason. Basically, I see about that level of difference in most any game app. I've benchmarked it in GP2, ICR2, GPL, F15, F4.
BRH 31 Dec 1998#442728
ABSOLUTELY! I upgraded to an Overclaocked Celeron 300A about 2 months ago, and have had no real problems. I did have to add a few fans in my case though, to keep the temps down. I now run GPL with full graphics and a full field of cars, and get 36 Frames per second solid, after the start of the race. (Voodoo2) David's response to your post is dead-on. I used the Abit BH6 MB and the overclocking really went smooth. For more info, check out: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit alt.comp.hardware.overclocking, and www.tomshardware.com There's LOTS of good info on the net about overclocking the Celeron. Best upgrade I ever made! Good Luck! Bert > Is it true that the Celeron can be overclocked from 300 to 450?? I am > seriously considering upgrading. The question is: is it worth it to > overclock it for racing sims?
Davelo 31 Dec 1998#442729
I went from a P233 to c300a oc' to 450 a few weeks ago.GPL was the main reason,and I must say it was most definitely worth it!Words cannot describe the feeling of racing a full field of cars with all graphics and high FPS. Dave Seattle,WA.
Nathan Wong 31 Dec 1998#442730
Quoted text (7 lines)>I just upgraded, installed it yesterday, putting it through its paces as I >write. So, I'll get back to you on this. >For now, it's running at 83, but hung at 100 with a scary registry error. >I've also had it hang once at 83. Sometimes it might take a while for the >chip to "set". And I might have to play with the core voltage. So time will >tell.
Did you buy a retail boxed Celeron or the OEM version? Retails are far more liekly to overclock that OEMs. I dropped mine in and booted it at 300, then re-booted and switched to 450 with no worries. The CPU code on mine is SL32A (retail boxed Celeron) Mine is runnig stable at 450 on 1.90V. It also helps with less heat being dissipated. -- Nathan Wong http://www.nectar.com.au/~alfacors - Super Touring - Alfa Romeo - - V8Supercars - CART -
>>For now, it's running at 83, but hung at 100 with a scary registry error. >>I've also had it hang once at 83. Sometimes it might take a while for the >>chip to "set". And I might have to play with the core voltage. So time will >>tell. >Did you buy a retail boxed Celeron or the OEM version? It's the boxed one, from NECX. Malaysia, same SL32A as yours. I hate you :-) Any special other settings? I'm still having problems. Now running at 75 MHz. 83 still gives occasional glitches at 2.0 or 2.1. Case cover is off, system typically runs at 32C. Is there a way to read the CPU T outside of the BIOS, ie in Windows? Yes, all PC100 ram. Most of this system (the second RAM chip is new) was running fine in my old HOT-569 p200MMX at 83 MHz. Time will tell. Oh, to the original poster: Note that the popular oc'ing MB's are all ATX format. So you'll need an ATX case, about $60 on up.
Alan 01 Jan 1999#442912
when i had problems running my 300a at 374, i posted to alt.overclockers (or something) - and they pointed out that at 374 the PCI bus has to run at an unusually high speed, and often this causes problems with hard drives, cdroms, memory (sometimes) and so on. The consensus of the replies was "forget about 374, try 450". Coz at 450 the PCI bus is back to normal speed. So I did, and have run at 450 for three months now with no problems whatsoever, even though i have no extra cooling! I'd concentrate on getting 450 up and running if I were you.
Quoted text (12 lines)>when i had problems running my 300a at 374, i posted to >alt.overclockers (or something) - and they pointed out that at 374 the >PCI bus has to run at an unusually high speed, and often this causes >problems with hard drives, cdroms, memory (sometimes) and so on. >The consensus of the replies was "forget about 374, try 450". Coz at >450 the PCI bus is back to normal speed. >So I did, and have run at 450 for three months now with no problems >whatsoever, even though i have no extra cooling! >I'd concentrate on getting 450 up and running if I were you.
If that was to me... I'm running at 374 (83 MHz) right now. You have the choice of dropping the AGP (and I think it controls PCI too) to a 2:3 divider (so it would run at 55 MHz instead of 66) or 1:1 (where it would be, as you said, overspeed at 83). I think I'm at 83 right now, and my old P200/250 ran at 83 all the time. I just tried 450 again and it again failed to load Win95 :( It did at least work fine in DOS7 for over an hour. And 83 is a lot more stable. So there is hope yet as the system settles in. Thanks for the tips.
Nathan Wong 01 Jan 1999#442914
>It's the boxed one, from NECX. Malaysia, same SL32A as yours. Damn, rules out one factor then :( Not really. I have an additional 3" fan in the front of my case sucking cold air in, other than that, nope. Im using Motherboard Monitor at the moment. It's sitting on 32C according to the motherboard temp sensor (which is quite near the CPU). Ambient today is approx 25-26C. it's a shame you didnt buy the CPU from a local guy or a guy you know, coz my guy told me to bring it back if it didnt overclock and he would swap it for a different one (but the same SL code). -- Nathan Wong http://www.nectar.com.au/~alfacors - Super Touring - Alfa Romeo - - V8Supercars - CART -
Chatham 01 Jan 1999#442915
Quoted text (30 lines)>>>For now, it's running at 83, but hung at 100 with a scary registry error. >>>I've also had it hang once at 83. Sometimes it might take a while for the >>>chip to "set". And I might have to play with the core voltage. So time will >>>tell. >>Did you buy a retail boxed Celeron or the OEM version? >It's the boxed one, from NECX. Malaysia, same SL32A as yours. >>>2.1 or 2.2 are req'd for stable oc'ing). Heat is an issue. So, take your >>>chances. >>Mine is runnig stable at 450 on 1.90V. It also helps with less heat >>being dissipated. >I hate you :-) >Any special other settings? >I'm still having problems. Now running at 75 MHz. 83 still gives >occasional glitches at 2.0 or 2.1. Case cover is off, system typically runs >at 32C. >Is there a way to read the CPU T outside of the BIOS, ie in Windows? >Yes, all PC100 ram. Most of this system (the second RAM chip is new) was >running fine in my old HOT-569 p200MMX at 83 MHz. Time will tell. >Oh, to the original poster: Note that the popular oc'ing MB's are all ATX >format. So you'll need an ATX case, about $60 on up.
Download Motherboard Monitor here to read temp in Win98... http://www.euronet.nl/users/darkside/mbmonitor I have C300A running at 504 Mhz if you need help let me know. CPUID : GenuineIntel, Typ=0, Family=6, Model=6, Step=0 Processor Core : Pentium II, > Deschutes (Katmai? Williamette?) L1 Data Cache : 16 KB, 4way associative L1 Code Cache : 16 KB, 4way associative L2 Cache: : 128 KB, 4way associative L2 Cacheable Area : 4 GByte L2 ECC : present and enabled Actual clock rate : 503.9 MHz System clock rate : default: 66.6 MHz, measured:112.0 MHz Ratio (cpu/syst) : 4.5 ctP2info has detected : Pentium II 503.9 MHz with ECC Please notify ct via internet: http://www.heise.de/ct/ctp2poll) L2 Controller : ID:00, Step:00, Type:BSRAM L2 Manufacturer : ID:00 L2 Cache Size : ??, 1 bank L2 Latency Mode : 00 L2 Latency : 5 In Order Queue Depth : 8 Fast Strings : true MTRR0:00000000..07FFFFFF: WB 0 MB .. 128 MB F8000000 MTRR1:E0000000..E1FFFFFF: UC 3584 MB .. 3616 MB FE000000 MTRR2:E2000000..E3FFFFFF: WC 3616 MB .. 3648 MB FE000000 MTRR3:E5000000..E53FFFFF: WC 3664 MB .. 3668 MB FFC00000 Write Combining for LFB (Linear Frame Buffer) supported
Nathan Wong 01 Jan 1999#442916
>If that was to me... >I'm running at 374 (83 MHz) right now. You have the choice of dropping the >AGP (and I think it controls PCI too) to a 2:3 divider (so it would run at 55 >MHz instead of 66) or 1:1 (where it would be, as you said, overspeed at 83). I >think I'm at 83 right now, and my old P200/250 ran at 83 all the time. The PCI is actually running at 1/2 the bus speed when you're at 83. So basically, your PCI devices are now running at 41.5 from what I have read, the better quality vidcards etc will happily run above 33MHz, lets say 37.5 when you run 75MHz bus. But over 40MHz is pushing things a bit. PCI automatically halves the bus speed in every increment until you get to 100Mhz when it divides by 3 (to get the optimal 33MHz). Have you tried changing your memory? It could be that your memory is to blame. After all, not all PC100 are created equal. It could even be that you're not running PC100 memory (re-badged 66?)? Mine runs fine up to 112MHz, but it wouldnt post at 124Mhz using my old 266 Celeron when I tried for 496 :-) -- Nathan Wong http://www.nectar.com.au/~alfacors - Super Touring - Alfa Romeo - - V8Supercars - CART -
Craig Jol 01 Jan 1999#442917
If it is stable at 374 but not 450 you should try to increase you core voltage in small increments, but, only with proper cooling. Craig
Quoted text (24 lines)>>when i had problems running my 300a at 374, i posted to >>alt.overclockers (or something) - and they pointed out that at 374 the >>PCI bus has to run at an unusually high speed, and often this causes >>problems with hard drives, cdroms, memory (sometimes) and so on. >>The consensus of the replies was "forget about 374, try 450". Coz at >>450 the PCI bus is back to normal speed. >>So I did, and have run at 450 for three months now with no problems >>whatsoever, even though i have no extra cooling! >>I'd concentrate on getting 450 up and running if I were you. >If that was to me... >I'm running at 374 (83 MHz) right now. You have the choice of dropping the >AGP (and I think it controls PCI too) to a 2:3 divider (so it would run at 55 >MHz instead of 66) or 1:1 (where it would be, as you said, overspeed at 83). I >think I'm at 83 right now, and my old P200/250 ran at 83 all the time. >I just tried 450 again and it again failed to load Win95 :( >It did at least work fine in DOS7 for over an hour. And 83 is a lot more >stable. So there is hope yet as the system settles in. >Thanks for the tips.
Which motherboard are you using? On my Abit BH6, it's over between the PCI/ISA slots (ie: about as far from the CPU as you can get). :( OTOH, I've got an OEM Costa Rican C300A with an AAVID OEM fan that runs nicely at 450MHz and the temp doesn't go over 32C (in fact, it usually doesn't raise more than a degreeC going from 300 to 450 MHz). Also, for folks looking to buy an overclockable Celeron, some retailers are now guaranteeing that they'll run at 100MHz FSB (for a few dollars more, of course :). "But in a way, fear is a big part of racing, because if there was nothing to be frightened of, and no limit, any fool could get into a motor car and racing would not exist as a sport." -- Jim Clark

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy