Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Papyrus dumps Rendition owners :(

11 posts by 9 people · 18 Nov 1998 - 29 Nov 1998

Sue 18 Nov 1998#435248
Rendition owners get no Windows 9x native support in NASCAR 1999 Edition. We are just getting screwed by Papyrus, plain and simple. I am lucky enough to also have a Monster 2 12mb, but this is getting ridiculous. Papyrus, are you schizophrenic or what? You make GPL and with it a little ole 4mb PCI Thriller outguns the Voodoo 2. Next you make NASCAR 1999 Edition and suddenly it's the Voodoo 2 that is king again. Come on guys, what the hell is the problem? Now as for those folks who have loyally supported Papyrus racing sims over the years and probably bought Rendition boards just because of this, why are you dumping them now? I really don't get it. I expect a native Win9x Rendition version to be added or else Papyrus will forever go down a notch in my mind. -- Matt please respond to "mracer" at that isp called "mindspring dot com"
Dan Kaps 19 Nov 1998#435443
So, while you own a Voodoo2 board which Papyrus now writes to...you are trying to be the savior for all the people with Rendition boards who aren't as "lucky" as you who also owns a V2? You speak as if Papyrus owes you something ("We're getting screwed... and...I expect this and that"). If they said "Go buy a Rendition board today because our next title will support it", and then it doesn't, you would have a valid complaint. Voodoo board owners out-number Rendition owners by a long shot. They supported Rendition for a long time and you probably enjoyed their titles before. Now you can enjoy them with your Voodoo board. I'm sure the people without Voodoo boards will be able to get one to enjoy Nascar 99 just like you. They'll be just fine, you'll see.
Quoted text (19 lines)>Rendition owners get no Windows 9x native support in NASCAR >1999 Edition. We are just getting screwed by Papyrus, plain >and simple. I am lucky enough to also have a Monster 2 12mb, >but this is getting ridiculous. Papyrus, are you >schizophrenic or what? You make GPL and with it a little ole >4mb PCI Thriller outguns the Voodoo 2. Next you make NASCAR >1999 Edition and suddenly it's the Voodoo 2 that is king >again. Come on guys, what the hell is the problem? Now as >for those folks who have loyally supported Papyrus racing >sims over the years and probably bought Rendition boards >just because of this, why are you dumping them now? I really >don't get it. I expect a native Win9x Rendition version to >be added or else Papyrus will forever go down a notch in my >mind. >-- >Matt >please respond to "mracer" at that isp called "mindspring >dot com"
Ben Coleman 19 Nov 1998#435444
Have a whine mate!! You may notice that the number of ppl complaining about the preference for Rendition in past Papy sims and calling for better 3dfx support is waaay more that the other way around. So Papy appears to have folded (thank you papy!) and gone with the times. I hate to think how narky you'll get if they (gasp!) support Direct3D!! Ben
Quoted text (19 lines)>Rendition owners get no Windows 9x native support in NASCAR >1999 Edition. We are just getting screwed by Papyrus, plain >and simple. I am lucky enough to also have a Monster 2 12mb, >but this is getting ridiculous. Papyrus, are you >schizophrenic or what? You make GPL and with it a little ole >4mb PCI Thriller outguns the Voodoo 2. Next you make NASCAR >1999 Edition and suddenly it's the Voodoo 2 that is king >again. Come on guys, what the hell is the problem? Now as >for those folks who have loyally supported Papyrus racing >sims over the years and probably bought Rendition boards >just because of this, why are you dumping them now? I really >don't get it. I expect a native Win9x Rendition version to >be added or else Papyrus will forever go down a notch in my >mind. >-- >Matt >please respond to "mracer" at that isp called "mindspring >dot com"
Scott Moore 19 Nov 1998#435445
Did you bother to try running NR1999 with Rendition under Win95? It works perfectly- I'd love to know what you're fussing about. It even installs a shortcut in the start menu, and worked fine for me with no tweaking at all. We have nothing to *** about.
Quoted text (19 lines)>Rendition owners get no Windows 9x native support in NASCAR >1999 Edition. We are just getting screwed by Papyrus, plain >and simple. I am lucky enough to also have a Monster 2 12mb, >but this is getting ridiculous. Papyrus, are you >schizophrenic or what? You make GPL and with it a little ole >4mb PCI Thriller outguns the Voodoo 2. Next you make NASCAR >1999 Edition and suddenly it's the Voodoo 2 that is king >again. Come on guys, what the hell is the problem? Now as >for those folks who have loyally supported Papyrus racing >sims over the years and probably bought Rendition boards >just because of this, why are you dumping them now? I really >don't get it. I expect a native Win9x Rendition version to >be added or else Papyrus will forever go down a notch in my >mind. >-- >Matt >please respond to "mracer" at that isp called "mindspring >dot com"
Harald Boer 19 Nov 1998#435446
Ahhhhhh thanks brother! I was a little worried after I read that initial post and thought Papy had gone mad. Now I hope that NR1999 will be released here in Holland. Harald
Greg Cisko 19 Nov 1998#435447
Gone mad by not supporting rendition? Get real. -- Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com >>Did you bother to try running NR1999 with Rendition under Win95? It works >>perfectly- I'd love to know what you're fussing about. It even installs a >>shortcut in the start menu, and worked fine for me with no tweaking at all. >>We have nothing to *** about. >Ahhhhhh thanks brother! I was a little worried after I read that initial >post and thought Papy had gone mad. Now I hope that NR1999 will be released >here in Holland. >Harald
Jay Wolf 19 Nov 1998#435448
okay. i've always ignored posts that say anything about "voodoo" ***because i am a supporter of sierra stuff and they all seem to run just fine with the ol' rendition chip. it works for me just fine and i have no use for these other mumbo-jumbo deals..until now, i guess. i've heard rumors about "washed out" looking screens and ***like that.***that. rendition for me. here is my question: i run a WIN95 system. am i able to use both a voodoo thingy and my rendition in the same system? at the same time? if "yes", what is the best voodoo to get. they have a "1" and a "2", right? i don't really care about cost, so the best is just fine. if i can't run nascar99 with my rendition - i won't buy it. they damn well better have rendition support for nascar2000. i don't want to get into a video card holy war at all, but i am intentionally ignorant of other options. danke sehr, j
Quoted text (23 lines)> Gone mad by not supporting rendition? Get real. > -- > Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. > cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com > >>Did you bother to try running NR1999 with Rendition under Win95? It works > >>perfectly- I'd love to know what you're fussing about. It even installs a > >>shortcut in the start menu, and worked fine for me with no tweaking at > all. > >>We have nothing to *** about. > >Ahhhhhh thanks brother! I was a little worried after I read that initial > >post and thought Papy had gone mad. Now I hope that NR1999 will be released > >here in Holland. > >Harald
Greg Cisko 19 Nov 1998#435449
>okay. i've always ignored posts that say anything about "voodoo" ***because i >am a supporter of sierra stuff and they all seem to run just fine with the ol' >rendition chip. it works for me just fine and i have no use for these other >mumbo-jumbo deals..until now, i guess. i've heard rumors about "washed out" >looking screens and ***like that.***that. rendition for me. >here is my question: i run a WIN95 system. am i able to use both a voodoo thingy >and my rendition in the same system? at the same time? if "yes", what is the Yes and Yes. i If you have a fast P2 (over 300mhz) get a voodoo2, anything slower a Voodoo1 will do. And I bought N1999 because it did support 3dfx so I guess we will cancel each other out :-) -- Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com >don't want to get into a video card holy war at all, but i am intentionally >ignorant of other options. >danke sehr, >j >> Gone mad by not supporting rendition? Get real. >> -- >> Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. >> cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com >> >>Did you bother to try running NR1999 with Rendition under Win95? It works >> >>perfectly- I'd love to know what you're fussing about. It even installs a >> >>shortcut in the start menu, and worked fine for me with no tweaking at >> all. >> >>We have nothing to *** about. >> >Ahhhhhh thanks brother! I was a little worried after I read that initial >> >post and thought Papy had gone mad. Now I hope that NR1999 will be released >> >here in Holland. >> >Harald
UNC879wi 20 Nov 1998#435608
I have both. Pii-333mhz, 128mb Ram Rendition Thriller 8mb PCI Creative Labs VooDoo2 12mb PCI 3dfx --the "washed out" you hear about in 3dfx will disappear if you adjust the Gamma Correction down to 0.9 in the 3dfx Properties Screen. While the frame rate drop (in GPL) is about 5fps compared to the Thriller, I have to admit that the graphics are clearer.... minus the anti-aliaising. I am not sure if AA is available for 3dfx in N1999 or not. - Regardless, it is very nice to pick and choose which game executable you want to use when you have both cards. Andrew B. San Diego
Greg Cisko 20 Nov 1998#435609
>--the "washed out" you hear about in 3dfx will disappear if you adjust the >Gamma Correction down to 0.9 in the 3dfx Properties Screen. While the frame >rate drop (in GPL) is about 5fps compared to the Thriller, I have to admit that >the graphics are clearer.... minus the anti-aliaising. I am not sure if AA is >available for 3dfx in N1999 or not. According to the readme there is a environment variable for AA in the 3dfx version. But changing this number did nothing. -- Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
Hi Andrew, Just curious. Why do you say the PCI Thriller rather than the AGP ? I'm aware Hercules says the Thriller AGP doesn't use the various AGP features, but they do say it does take advantage of the faster AGP bus speeds. This sounds like a AGP would be better. Is there some particular reason you prefer the PCI ? Cheers. Phillip McNelley

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy