Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

N99 and NO car makes

10 posts by 8 people · 18 Nov 1998 - 22 Nov 1998

Adam 18 Nov 1998#435115
Quoted text (11 lines)> Where ya been??? We've been talking about Papyrus not getting the >rights to the logos weeks ago... you can replace that ***in 5 minutes. > > Jon > >-- >ORSA [link lost in import: /~chevyfan/orsa] >JEG Racing http://home.earthlink.net/~chevyfan/jeg >SuperPatch Central! http://home.earthlink.net/~chevyfan > >
That's fine and dandy and all....but why is everyone being blinded by their lust for Papyrus? It is *cheap* for Sierra/Papyrus to take the lame way out and name them "chassis 1, 2, and 3". Yeah, we can download the real makes on the net, but what about those without net access? Guys, I love Papy as much as the rest of you all, but this is a very, VERY cheap impression that Sierra/Papyrus has made on me. I can't believe that they would ship a Nascar SIMULATION, without the car makes. That's 1980's ***there plain and simple. I can't believe you guys would think otherwise. It is cheap. Cheap. Cheap. We as customers have shelled out Lord knows how much money to make Nascar2 one of the best selling games of all time, and kept the game in or near the list of top 10 games for the past 2 years. We've spent money on a Busch Expansion Pack, some of have spent money on the "50th anniversary" edition. (just a repacked N2 with GNS....and a fancy shiny box) Now most of us are spending money on a "1999 edition" (just N2, GNS, and CTS.....and a fancy, shiny new box). So most of us have loyally backed Papyrus and their "repackaging" of the same game for the past two years.....and after all of this loyalty, they go out and won't pay for the same licenses that they owned in the first place!!!!! Come on guys, are we seriously defending Sierra/Papy for leaving out car makes in the 1999 edition? How about when N3 comes out that we have no car sponsorships, no track name, and no car makes.....would we still defend Sierra/Papy? We'd all be racing at the "Alabama Speedway" while driving the "Clip 'em Lawn Service" car, which of course would be "Chassis #2". But of course, we all still love the game to no end right? It's still the best damn simulation ever made right? Would computer sports gamers accept a sports game by EASports that didn't have Real Teams and Real Players? Back in the 80's, they used to make games like that and called the teams the "New York Apples" and the "Utah Silver-Dollars", but that kind of stuff doesn't fly in the 90's. Again, I love this sim as much as the rest of ya'll. And race it day and night like the rest of ya'll. But I refuse to accept Sierra/Papy taking the cheap way out. I take it as a shot to all of us, and to all of the money we've spent, and to all the loyalty we've shown.
Todd 19 Nov 1998#435347
I kinda agree, only in that I/we should have paid MUCH less money for this game if Papy didn't spend the money on the licenses. They shove this "We will save alot of money if we don't add the licenses to the game" BS down our throats, then turn around and STILL charge $45.00 for the damn game. For my $45.00, I want it all baby! No short cuts, no skimping on anything. Well, I didn't get it................... Of course, I will proceed to d/l the latest WC car set from the internet. Kudos to you guys who do these cars.............You are the ones that should get a cut of that $45.00 from Papy/$ierra, those tight-asses. Todd
Quoted text (46 lines)>> Where ya been??? We've been talking about Papyrus not getting the >>rights to the logos weeks ago... you can replace that ***in 5 minutes. >> >> Jon >> >>-- >>ORSA [link lost in import: /~chevyfan/orsa] >>JEG Racing http://home.earthlink.net/~chevyfan/jeg >>SuperPatch Central! http://home.earthlink.net/~chevyfan >> >> >That's fine and dandy and all....but why is everyone being blinded by their >lust for Papyrus? It is *cheap* for Sierra/Papyrus to take the lame way out >and name them "chassis 1, 2, and 3". Yeah, we can download the real makes >on the net, but what about those without net access? Guys, I love Papy as >much as the rest of you all, but this is a very, VERY cheap impression that >Sierra/Papyrus has made on me. I can't believe that they would ship a >Nascar SIMULATION, without the car makes. That's 1980's ***there plain >and simple. I can't believe you guys would think otherwise. It is cheap. >Cheap. Cheap. > We as customers have shelled out Lord knows how much money to make >Nascar2 one of the best selling games of all time, and kept the game in or >near the list of top 10 games for the past 2 years. We've spent money on a >Busch Expansion Pack, some of have spent money on the "50th anniversary" >edition. (just a repacked N2 with GNS....and a fancy shiny box) Now most >of us are spending money on a "1999 edition" (just N2, GNS, and CTS.....and >a fancy, shiny new box). So most of us have loyally backed Papyrus and >their "repackaging" of the same game for the past two years.....and after >all of this loyalty, they go out and won't pay for the same licenses that >they owned in the first place!!!!! Come on guys, are we seriously >defending Sierra/Papy for leaving out car makes in the 1999 edition? How >about when N3 comes out that we have no car sponsorships, no track name, and >no car makes.....would we still defend Sierra/Papy? >We'd all be racing at the "Alabama Speedway" while driving the "Clip 'em >Lawn Service" car, which of course would be "Chassis #2". But of course, we >all still love the game to no end right? It's still the best damn >simulation ever made right? >Would computer sports gamers accept a sports game by EASports that didn't >have Real Teams and Real Players? Back in the 80's, they used to make games >like that and called the teams the "New York Apples" and the "Utah >Silver-Dollars", but that kind of stuff doesn't fly in the 90's. > Again, I love this sim as much as the rest of ya'll. And race it day >and night like the rest of ya'll. But I refuse to accept Sierra/Papy taking >the cheap way out. I take it as a shot to all of us, and to all of the >money we've spent, and to all the loyalty we've shown.
|Of course, I will proceed to d/l the latest WC car set from the |internet. Kudos to you guys who do these cars.............You are the |ones that should get a cut of that $45.00 from Papy/$ierra, those |tight-asses. | |Todd That is EXACTLY what I was thinking! I can't thank IWCCCARS enough for their outstanding artisan work with ALL the series!! I'm planning on making some kind of contribution to them soon. I bought N1 a month or so after it came out. Then bought N2 the DAY it came out. Then bought Nas50th several months after it came out (after selling N2, it cost me $15). Bought N99 yesterday. I'll buy N3 the DAY it comes out, too. While I share in the disgust at them using "chassis 1, 2 and 3", as long as they allow for as much expansion (custom cars) as they have, I'll continue to support them. Don't forget, they just went through a MAJOR shakeup and we're lucky N3 survived at ALL!! Now, who has good locations for custom cars AND trucks?! Don Hancock "Gunner"
Greg Cisko 20 Nov 1998#435540
> While I share in the disgust at them using "chassis 1, 2 and 3", as long >as they allow for as much expansion (custom cars) as they have, I'll So what exactly is wrong with the chassis 1, 2, & 3? I thought it was a good feature. -- Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
Quoted text (7 lines)|> While I share in the disgust at them using "chassis 1, 2 and 3", as |long |>as they allow for as much expansion (custom cars) as they have, I'll | |So what exactly is wrong with the chassis 1, 2, & 3? I thought it |was a good feature. |
Kinda takes the glitter out of any inhouse "manufacturer's cup" race, dontcha think? Some of us tend to follow one manufacturer over another. I don't care what Papy calls 'em as long as I change 'em IN the game! Don Hancock
Greg Cisko 20 Nov 1998#435542
> Kinda takes the glitter out of any inhouse "manufacturer's cup" race, >dontcha think? Some of us tend to follow one manufacturer over another. I Nope. Manufacturer??? Right. It isn't like there are ford or chevy chassis or something. They are just modified for downforce (more, neutral and less). Doesn't seem like a big deal to me. In fact it seem like an improvement. -- Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes. cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com
Tom Store 21 Nov 1998#435699
I have downloaded the CTS Trucks from Sim-Racing. How do I include them into NR1999. The same goes for a set for Winston Cup and BGN. Can I interchange Car files? Tom
Scott Moore 21 Nov 1998#435700
Onless the CTS trucks are made for NR 1999, the paint jobs are not going to work right, due to the different layout of the paint shop. The WC and BGN cars need to be unzipped to the /cars folder. Just make sure you have no more than 128 cars or you won't be able to see them all.... >I have downloaded the CTS Trucks from Sim-Racing. How do I include them >into NR1999. The same goes for a set for Winston Cup and BGN. Can I >interchange Car files? >Tom
I totally agree. I dont have N99 yet but I will and I think that the people that make the cars that are doing it for free should get some money and atleast spend some money on the cars at least...of so you dont get a few tracks...oh well. Ie.Pocono but who cares. That makes me mad that they dont even spend the money on the licenses for the cars. My $.02 Dave online.net says...
Quoted text (50 lines)> I kinda agree, only in that I/we should have paid MUCH less money for > this game if Papy didn't spend the money on the licenses. They shove > this "We will save alot of money if we don't add the licenses to the > game" BS down our throats, then turn around and STILL charge $45.00 > for the damn game. For my $45.00, I want it all baby! No short cuts, > no skimping on anything. Well, I didn't get it................... > Of course, I will proceed to d/l the latest WC car set from the > internet. Kudos to you guys who do these cars.............You are the > ones that should get a cut of that $45.00 from Papy/$ierra, those > tight-asses. > Todd > >> Where ya been??? We've been talking about Papyrus not getting the > >>rights to the logos weeks ago... you can replace that ***in 5 minutes. > >> > >> Jon > >> > >>-- > >>ORSA [link lost in import: /~chevyfan/orsa] > >>JEG Racing http://home.earthlink.net/~chevyfan/jeg > >>SuperPatch Central! http://home.earthlink.net/~chevyfan > >> > >> > >That's fine and dandy and all....but why is everyone being blinded by their > >lust for Papyrus? It is *cheap* for Sierra/Papyrus to take the lame way out > >and name them "chassis 1, 2, and 3". Yeah, we can download the real makes > >on the net, but what about those without net access? Guys, I love Papy as > >much as the rest of you all, but this is a very, VERY cheap impression that > >Sierra/Papyrus has made on me. I can't believe that they would ship a > >Nascar SIMULATION, without the car makes. That's 1980's ***there plain > >and simple. I can't believe you guys would think otherwise. It is cheap. > >Cheap. Cheap. > > We as customers have shelled out Lord knows how much money to make > >Nascar2 one of the best selling games of all time, and kept the game in or > >near the list of top 10 games for the past 2 years. We've spent money on a > >Busch Expansion Pack, some of have spent money on the "50th anniversary" > >edition. (just a repacked N2 with GNS....and a fancy shiny box) Now most > >of us are spending money on a "1999 edition" (just N2, GNS, and CTS.....and > >a fancy, shiny new box). So most of us have loyally backed Papyrus and > >their "repackaging" of the same game for the past two years.....and after > >all of this loyalty, they go out and won't pay for the same licenses that > >they owned in the first place!!!!! Come on guys, are we seriously
I'll take anything you can send! :) Send it c/o Santa, North Pole... Truck templates on my page.... Mike (TEN ID:mpete) http://www.mnworld.com Mike's Nascar World
Quoted text (9 lines)>I totally agree. I dont have N99 yet but I will and I think that the >people that make the cars that are doing it for free should get some >money and atleast spend some money on the cars at least...of so you dont >get a few tracks...oh well. Ie.Pocono but who cares. That makes me mad >that they dont even spend the money on the licenses for the cars. >My $.02 >Dave
online.net says... Todd

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy