Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Voodoo Vs Rendition please comment !

5 posts by 4 people · 26 Aug 1998 - 09 Sep 1998

m.i.. 26 Aug 1998#418099
I have just upgraded my system to include Stealth 2100 Rendition and Voodoo1 cards and was comparing the 2 cards in different 3d apps. Does anybody out there in this group notice the darker and much more grainy image that Stealth 2100 gives compared to 3DFX Voodoo. I've heard it mentioned on here so many times that Rendition image quality is better which i find to the opposite. GP2 and ICR2 have no graininess and everything else that i have tried has this horrible grainy dark look......Quake1, Quake2, GPL. I'm not really worried about Quake1 and 11 but GPL must look better than than that. The Voodoo image is really clear and has no graininess. Is there anybody out there that has compared the image quality in GPL. The Stealth 2100 is great for GP2 due to built in VESA 2.0 support and i really like the card in Windows. Can anybody shed some light on this ?
I have both a StealthII and Voodoo1, I use the voodoo1 instead of the Rendtion cuz I didnt like that grainyness either. Does anyone know if the V2200 has the same image quality? Is this just a V2100 bug or something? Arthur s t e a l t h r a c i n g http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html
Quoted text (18 lines)>I have just upgraded my system to include Stealth 2100 Rendition and >Voodoo1 cards and was comparing the 2 cards in different 3d apps. >Does anybody out there in this group notice the darker and much more >grainy image that Stealth 2100 gives compared to 3DFX Voodoo. >I've heard it mentioned on here so many times that Rendition image >quality is better which i find to the opposite. >GP2 and ICR2 have no graininess and everything else that i have tried >has this horrible grainy dark look......Quake1, Quake2, GPL. >I'm not really worried about Quake1 and 11 but GPL must look better than >than that. The Voodoo image is really clear and has no graininess. >Is there anybody out there that has compared the image quality in GPL. >The Stealth 2100 is great for GP2 due to built in VESA 2.0 support and i >really like the card in Windows. >Can anybody shed some light on this ?
I have a Stealth II myself, and I don't recognize your description of the image quality at all! First of all: GPL looks almost identical on Rendition and Voodoo! If it doesn't, there must be something wrong with your graphic card drivers... Are you sure you are using rendition hardware acceleration? I bet not! When it comes to Quake and quake 2, the OpenGL-versions ARE dark, also on the voodoo cards. The rendition Q2 renderer is quite light, looks very good (crisp and clear) and is quite fast actually! It even has a possibility to set hardware antialiasing (not existant on voodoo) The rendition version of quake 1 is fast, and has a very nice image quality. The GL versions look the same ---Asgeir---
Quoted text (10 lines)> I have both a StealthII and Voodoo1, I use the voodoo1 instead of the > Rendtion cuz I didnt like that grainyness either. Does anyone know if the > V2200 has the same image quality? Is this just a V2100 bug or something? > Arthur > s t e a l t h > r a c i n g > http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html > .
Yes I am using the rendition acceleration with anti aliasing turned on, duh. And Stealth II drivers I tried were 1.06 and 1.10, the two latest versions. Maybe you are not using the latest voodoo drivers? hehehe Though some people sware the rendition image quality is better, yea it looks sharper but I perfer the voodoo smoothness over the rendition. Arthur s t e a l t h r a c i n g http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html >I have a Stealth II myself, and I don't recognize your description of the >image quality at all! First of all: GPL looks almost identical on Rendition >and Voodoo! If it doesn't, there must be something wrong with your graphic >card drivers... Are you sure you are using rendition hardware acceleration? I >bet not! >When it comes to Quake and quake 2, the OpenGL-versions ARE dark, also on the >voodoo cards. The rendition Q2 renderer is quite light, looks very good (crisp >and clear) and is quite fast actually! It even has a possibility to set >hardware antialiasing (not existant on voodoo) The rendition version of quake
Quoted text (17 lines)>1 is fast, and has a very nice image quality. The GL versions look the same >---Asgeir--- >> I have both a StealthII and Voodoo1, I use the voodoo1 instead of the >> Rendtion cuz I didnt like that grainyness either. Does anyone know if the >> V2200 has the same image quality? Is this just a V2100 bug or something? >> Arthur >> s t e a l t h >> r a c i n g >> http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html >> .
GP2 and ICR2 do not use 3d cards, they were writen before the 3DFX boom. -Stephen Hood -- Stephen.J.Hood

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy