Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

PowerVR (m3D) performance?

3 posts by 3 people · 10 May 1998 - 12 May 1998

Hi Everyone I've just bought a Matrox m3D PowerVR card to try to increase 3D graphics performance in, for example, TOCA. To be honest I am thoroughly disappointed with the resulting performance. In fact, it's so bad I'm wondering if the card is faulty because the performance in TOCA and Moto Racer (haven't tried F1RS yet) is actually a good deal WORSE that it is with the orignal Matrox Mystique that in the machine!!! With the MYSTIQUE the frame rate in TOCA (with high resolution and low detail) is very smooth, and is quite playable in medium detail. With the M3D though, the frame rate drops noticeably - to the point where I do not want to play the game anymore. I have tried every driver version and, curiously, the PowerVR generic/reference drivers worked much better than Matrox' own latest version! They produced no display "glitches" and the frame rate was slightly higher. I have also tried it in both my machines (Intel 233MMX with 48Mb RAM and IBM 6x86MX-PR200 with 32Mb RAM) with the same results i.e. worse performance than Mystique in both cases - even with the m3D-optimised Moto Racer demo that came with the m3D card!!! It was even out performed by an S3 Virge DX at one point! I'd be grateful for any comments from anyone running similar kit/games to mine because I bought this card thnking that it was a close competitor and cheaper, but viable, alternative to 3DFX (I have an Orchid Righteous 3D in my other machine). This appears to be far from the truth. Is PowerVR really this crap, or have I got a faulty card? It's going back to my supplier one way or another, either for replacement or refund. Many thanks for any advice...........Mark
: Hi Everyone : I've just bought a Matrox m3D PowerVR card to try to increase 3D graphics : performance in, for example, TOCA. To be honest I am thoroughly : disappointed with the resulting performance. In fact, it's so bad I'm : wondering if the card is faulty because the performance in TOCA and Moto : Racer (haven't tried F1RS yet) is actually a good deal WORSE that it is : with the orignal Matrox Mystique that in the machine!!! : With the MYSTIQUE the frame rate in TOCA (with high resolution and low : detail) is very smooth, and is quite playable in medium detail. With the : M3D though, the frame rate drops noticeably - to the point where I do not : want to play the game anymore. : I have tried every driver version and, curiously, the PowerVR : generic/reference drivers worked much better than Matrox' own latest : version! They produced no display "glitches" and the frame rate was : slightly higher. : I have also tried it in both my machines (Intel 233MMX with 48Mb RAM and : IBM 6x86MX-PR200 with 32Mb RAM) with the same results i.e. worse : performance than Mystique in both cases - even with the m3D-optimised Moto : Racer demo that came with the m3D card!!! It was even out performed by an : S3 Virge DX at one point! : I'd be grateful for any comments from anyone running similar kit/games to : mine because I bought this card thnking that it was a close competitor and : cheaper, but viable, alternative to 3DFX (I have an Orchid Righteous 3D in : my other machine). This appears to be far from the truth. : Is PowerVR really this crap, or have I got a faulty card? It's going back : to my supplier one way or another, either for replacement or refund. : Many thanks for any advice...........Mark I also experienced that problem too. When i bought TOCA i had a Apocalypse 3Dx card (exactly the same as Matrox m3d) and i felt very bad with the performance of the card. That and many other reasons took me to change that card for a Monster 3d and the results were all that i could expect from a 3d card: high frame rates with excelent graphics.
Ford Prefe 12 May 1998#408299
The 'problem' is that PowerVR takes a hugely different approach to 3d rendering. It is far better, with far more expansion capability. Normal 3d technology is reaching its limit, though that limit is pretty impresive. But as PowerVR is so different it requires a different way of programming. Games that support it native code are simply amazing. It uses far less silicon, which means it's cheaper. The new version of PowerVR due out later this year won't be much more than the current one, but it's compatibility with standard programming is supposed to be far better. -- 'Ambition makes you look very ugly kicking squeeling gucci little piggy' 'step into my world'

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy