Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

CPR - Glide Patch - Thoughts

4 posts by 3 people · 01 Apr 1998 - 01 Apr 1998

Huk_Phi 01 Apr 1998#402285
Well, I intalled the ".dll" file and fired up CPR. sure enough, I had a 3Dfx option in my "graphics" menu. I have a modest p200mmx with a 8mb V2 card. I set all options to max (except the steering wheel, which I do not care for) - set the "clipping" distance to 30, and started a "quick race". I definately thought the frame rate was better. As a matter of fact, with multiple cars on the screen (like at the start of the race) - I got no stuttering for the first time ever. I did not fiddle with the game to long - it was late - but what I saw, I liked. Of course the patch does not change the "gameplay" elements of the game, BUT, for people like me who are stuck with the disk, it is better than nothing. Tony G. - Nice Work -- Huk_Phin
Marc 01 Apr 1998#402286
Quoted text (13 lines)> Well, I intalled the ".dll" file and fired up CPR. sure enough, I had a >3Dfx option in my "graphics" menu. I have a modest p200mmx with a 8mb V2 >card. I set all options to max (except the steering wheel, which I do not >care for) - set the "clipping" distance to 30, and started a "quick race". > I definately thought the frame rate was better. As a matter of fact, >with multiple cars on the screen (like at the start of the race) - I got no >stuttering for the first time ever. I did not fiddle with the game to >long - it was late - but what I saw, I liked. Of course the patch does not >change the "gameplay" elements of the game, BUT, for people like me who are >stuck with the disk, it is better than nothing. >Tony G. - Nice Work
I just tried it with the demo, so I don't know if this applies to the full game also. I set all the graphics on their highest settings and noticed a few things: - framerate was definetely higher. Everything was smoother. I have a P233 with a Voodoo2, so someone with a slower system and a Voodoo1 will probably notice more of a difference. - Textures seemed "cleaner", and more vibrant. I wasn't sure if my mind was playing tricks on me, so I asked my brother which looked better and he happened to point out the Glide version. - Drawing was definately reduced and is occuring out-of-view. For example racing Miami, after hitting a turn I would go down a straight-away and I can easily see the stands drawing (very noticeable). With the Glide version the stands draw as I am hitting the turn (hard to notice since it is further away and the fence is blocking my view of it), and by the time I hit the straight-away it is already fully drawn. Overall, I would say the Glide patch isn't "earth-shattering", but does makes a good difference (more so on a slower machine with Voodoo1). That being said, TRI could have made better use of the Glide API and made the graphics that much better (ie. F1RS), but it's not bad for a first time out. Marc. -------- To replay via e-mail, remove "spam." from the beginning of my e-mail address (Tyring to avoid junk mail)
> That being said, TRI could have made better use of the Glide API and made the graphics that much better (ie. F1RS), but it's not bad for a first time out.>> I may be wrong, but I have a sneaking suspicion that TRI was, let's say, "discouraged" from taking the time to fully implement Glide, since MS had their own 3D algorithm to promote. I'm sure we'll never know, because if there's ONE thing MS is exceptionally good at, it is the crafting and enforcement of non-disclosure agreements with its developers... Bart Brown
Marc 01 Apr 1998#402288
On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 13:48:20 +0000, Barton Spencer Brown
Quoted text (10 lines)>> That being said, TRI could have made better use of the >Glide API and made the graphics that much better (ie. F1RS), but it's >not bad for a first time out.>> >I may be wrong, but I have a sneaking suspicion that TRI was, let's say, >"discouraged" from taking the time to fully implement Glide, since MS >had their own 3D algorithm to promote. I'm sure we'll never know, >because if there's ONE thing MS is exceptionally good at, it is the >crafting and enforcement of non-disclosure agreements with its >developers...
That's my suspision also. We know what Glide is capable of. It can offer great visuals while mainting very high frame rates. My guess is the developers did not exploit the API due to: a) lack of talent and/or time b) Microsoft interference. Marc. -------- To replay via e-mail, remove "spam." from the beginning of my e-mail address (Tyring to avoid junk mail)

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy