<<So CPR can be had for an effective $15>>
And it's *almost* worth it! ;) Pretty good for the "greatest racing sim
ever made"... really glad Microsoft supported it so well.
Bart Brown
CART Precision Racing price cuts and rebates
Posters noted CART Precision Racing selling for $35 with a $20 Microsoft rebate and mocked its fall. David Fisher accused critics of repeating the same complaints, sparking a heated exchange. A CPR track editor download was posted, and the game's UK release on February 20 was reported.
Automated summary.
Quoted text (9 lines)
>While browsing for other stuff at CompUSA today, I noticed that CPR is $35, >WITH a big sticker on it saying $20 rebate from MS that I don't recall >seeing before. Same sticker on the ones at Best Buy down the road but they >were still $49, unless they hadn't changed the price sticker on the shelf >(not uncommon). >So CPR can be had for an effective $15 or so if you look around. >KenWhile browsing for other stuff at CompUSA today, I noticed that CPR is $35,
WITH a big sticker on it saying $20 rebate from MS that I don't recall
seeing before. Same sticker on the ones at Best Buy down the road but they
were still $49, unless they hadn't changed the price sticker on the shelf
(not uncommon).
So CPR can be had for an effective $15 or so if you look around.
Ken
>>While browsing for other stuff at CompUSA today, I noticed that CPR is $35,
>>WITH a big sticker on it saying $20 rebate from MS that I don't recall
>>seeing before. Same sticker on the ones at Best Buy down the road but they
would
>be worth consideration!!!
>Tim
Ok, sorry if I wasn't clear...the price is $35...AND it has a $20 rebate,
effectively it's $15...so consider it hehe
Quoted text (8 lines)
>>were still $49, unless they hadn't changed the price sticker on the shelf >>(not uncommon). >>So CPR can be had for an effective $15 or so if you look around. >>Ken >Thanks, but no thanks! If it gets to $20, with a $35 rebate, THEN itWow, you guys are incredibly f***en funny. So are your brothers here on
r.a.s. You don't like the sim. We ALL know that you don't like it. We've
heard you say it over and over and over and...... If you don't like CPR,
then why not shut up about it and move on with your lives. Maybe try
actually talking to a real live girl. If you are too shy, contact your
favorite sim developer, stick your tongue down the back of their trousers,
and I'm sure they will make you a really great sim woman that you can play
with every day and then come to r.a.s. and tell us why it's the best and
everyone else's sim woman sucks. I know you must be the ultimate experts on
that subject as well. Also, don't forget to throw in quite a few of those
clever, sarcastic comments that you think are so entertaining.
All My Love,
Dave (Not a Blatantly Obvious Microsoft Hater) Fisher
> Wow, you guys are incredibly f***en funny. So are your brothers here on
What's with the funny stars there? You are using the word, so why don't
you
spell it out? Oh, you just pretend to be using *** words like
that...
snip
What's the name of your fan club?
l8er
ronny
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!
A case of a produce bubbling to its true vaule. Well, almost. Still a bit
of down bubbling to go yet.
Phillip McNelley
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 05:15:21 -0500, "DAVID G FISHER"
>Wow, you guys are incredibly f***en funny. So are your brothers here on
>r.a.s. You don't like the sim. We ALL know that you don't like it. We've
>heard you say it over and over and over and...... If you don't like CPR,
>then why not shut up about it and move on with your lives.....
Wow - touched a nerve there.
In the blue corner we have "CPR haters who can't move on with their
lives", in the red corner we have "CPR hater haters who can't move on
with their lives".
Pots and kettles.
Cheers!
John
>>If you don't like CPR, then why not shut up about it and move on with your lives. Maybe try actually talking to a real live girl.>>
Wow, this is just like those "LIVE *** *** sex slave" spams...
<<Also, don't forget to throw in quite a few of those clever, sarcastic
comments that you think are so entertaining.>>
Oh, OK! How about this one: "Time to increase the Prozac drip, Nurse
Ratchet..."
BTW, the word is "f***ing", not f***en" -- I think the latter is a
past-tense variant, as in "When we paid $50 for CPR, we got f***en!"
I stand corrected -- as Tim pointed out, it will be almost worth it when
the rebate exceeds the paying price by at least 25%...I'm gonna wait
until it's 50%, myself... oughta be about 3 weeks.
Bart (annoying, but lovable) Brown
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:34:57 GMT, "Ken Beard"
>While browsing for other stuff at CompUSA today, I noticed that CPR is $35,
>WITH a big sticker on it saying $20 rebate from MS that I don't recall
>seeing before.
Hmmm, that sounds more like the pricing you'd see on a successful
two year old game (like... Papyrus CART), not a four month old
"blockbuster" that's "selling very well, thank you". ;)
Before you send me UCE, I know what you're thinking... Did he complain
to five or six postmasters last month? Now, you must ask yourself one
question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do you, punk?
I understand the venom directed towards CPR, particularly given the hype for
it, but its really not that bad. Its just not done yet. I hold out some hope
that MS will do a competitive analysis with sims like F1RS and put out a
version 2 that will make us all forgive them for the shortcomings of version 1
:)
Randy
Randy Magruder
Staff Writer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com/
<<I hold out some hope that MS will do a competitive analysis with sims
like F1RS and put out a version 2 that will make us all forgive them for
the shortcomings of version 1 :)>> <--Hey! When did you grow a beard?
Randy--
I admire your optimism, and I hope for the best as well -- but what
about the people who paid good money (pre-Bargain Bin!) for version 1?
Do you think it's likely that Microsoft will give v1's involuntary beta
testers some kind of price break on the hypothetical v2? As it has never
happened before, to my knowledge, it would seem likely that those who
took MS at their word (no pun intended) are going to receive the
distinct pleasure of paying twice for a sim that should have been done
right the first time, instead of one that was hustled out the door in
time for Santa's elves to lug it all over the globe. And again, that's
giving the very generous benefit of the doubt that MS even *plans* a v2.
As for competitive analysis -- allow me one more biased opinion here:
since Microsoft has always done things there own way, with no regard for
standards except the doubtful ones they set themselves (recent
iterations of Word and Excel come to mind), why would they stoop, at
this late date, to even acknowledging the existence of other software
manufacturers, let alone taking any lessons from them? MS, as we have
seen time and again, is a law unto itself...
Just some curious thoughts...
Bart Brown
Who shit in your cornflakes? There was new information about a racing
simulator (the subject of this group, if you haven't noticed) and it
was posted. If it happens to be unflattering information about your
pet sim that's just too ***y bad.
That *would* be better than listening to you whine like one.
Joe
the people who paid good money (pre-Bargain Bin!) for version 1?>>
What about them?
testers some kind of price break on the hypothetical v2? >>
Probably a $10 rebate. I've seen them do this kind of thing with sequels such
as Cinemania updates, Flight Simulator updates ,etc.
those who took MS at their word (no pun intended) are going to receive the
distinct pleasure of paying twice for a sim that should have been done right
the first time, instead of one that was hustled out the door in time for
Santa's elves to lug it all over the globe.>>
Well, that's why they have a return policy. We vote with our $$ they get the
point. And lots of returns and dealers returning unsold stock is a strong
message, even to Microsoft.
*plans* a v2. >>
Agreed.
>> As for competitive analysis -- allow me one more biased opinion here: since Microsoft has always done things there own way, with no regard for
standards except the doubtful ones they set themselves (recent
iterations of Word and Excel come to mind), why would they stoop, at this
late date, to even acknowledging the existence of other software
manufacturers, let alone taking any lessons from them? MS, as we have seen
time and again, is a law unto itself... >>
I think you make the mistake of assuming that the Microsoft games business unit
operates under the same philosophy and goals as the operating systems business
unit. Games are not operating systems, and games can rarely be leveraged to
sell other games. And yes, Microsoft HAS bowed to public pressure. msn is no
longer a viable standalone online service because of the pressure of the
Internet and the competitive advantage enjoyed by its online service
competitors. Now msn is sold as a value-added internet provider. Microsoft
wasn't thrilled with Java, either, but they ended up adopting it and selling
development tools for it because they knew the public wanted it (and they
didn't want to get left behind if everyone went to it). There are other
examples, but I think you get the point.
Finally, what we have to hope for is that Microsoft considers its CART license
to be an ongoing series like Flight Simulator, so that, over time, it improves
and we see more and more stuff done with it.
Fortunately, as customers, we have alternatives. F1RS and anything from
Papyrus come to mind. From my personal standpoint, I got a review copy of CPR
so I wasn't out any money for it. However, because I'm such a CART fanatic and
desparately want the world's greatest CART simulation, it couldn't hurt any
more had I paid for it. I've paid $50 for worse games than CPR (and probably
will again no matter how hard I try not to). I can afford the game...what
hurts is the disappointment that my favorite sport is inadequately represented
by the sim and doesn't give me the experience I crave. Again, F1RS is doing a
great job filling that hole right now, so CPR just sees use on the Internet
*** Zone and for hotlaps.
Randy
Just some curious thoughts...
Bart Brown >>
Randy Magruder
Staff Writer
Digital Sportspage
[link lost in import]
>I admire your optimism, and I hope for the best as well -- but what
>about the people who paid good money (pre-Bargain Bin!) for version 1?
>Do you think it's likely that Microsoft will give v1's involuntary beta
>testers some kind of price break on the hypothetical v2? As it has never
>happened before, to my knowledge, it would seem likely that those who
MS routinely gives rebate coupons ($10 or $20 I forget which) to previous
owners of MS Flightsim. I would expect the same here. With all the sales
around Xmas a FS-95 owner could have upgraded to FS-98 for only $19.
--
Header intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
If you don't like CPR,
Hmm............... interesting conection, wonder what Mr. Freud would
think. If you don't like something you should immediately find a girl. To
what? Talk to her about it? Take it out on her?
Just because somebody is pissed off at the quality of a game you assume
they need a life? Perhaps next time you sit down to write something, you
should perhaps think, a least a little bit, first.
Bobby Upward
For version 1 of CPR, it was obvious to me that MS had taken quite a
few items from previous sims (ICR2, GP2, etc.) to create what they felt
was the ultimate sim...However, Obvious shortcomings in the way the AI
were implemented, underestimating hardware reqs (plus a few other
glaring issues that made the final cut), were all ingredients for a
less_than_spectacular product.
My point being, that MS had (IMHO) copied many items from the above
mentioned sims, but tweaked_and_pulled the software to their own liking.
Let's hope they take note of what's hot (and what works) so that if
they do CPR-2, it'll be a stellar success.
Cheers!
Marc
--
Marc J. Nelson
Sim Racing News - http://www.simnews.com
<remove '_*_' before replying>
Quoted text (7 lines)
> As for competitive analysis -- allow me one more biased opinion here: > since Microsoft has always done things there own way, with no regard for > standards except the doubtful ones they set themselves (recent > iterations of Word and Excel come to mind), why would they stoop, at > this late date, to even acknowledging the existence of other software > manufacturers, let alone taking any lessons from them? MS, as we have > seen time and again, is a law unto itself...Gee...don't know about you, but my sim-girl has plenty of problems at
the moment, and I'm not sure what to do with her...er...it. Tell me,
Mr. Sim_Girl_Expert, do you prefer the blonde, or the brunette sim-
girl? Actually, I thought the sim-blonde was a bit over-rated, and I
always had trouble loading her...er...it under Win95 D3D...Then I
discovered (as I'm sure you have...nightly) that the blonde actually
is better under 3Dfx, but of course, the Rendition version of the
sim-brunette is quite a knock-out...but I degress...
The problem I see seems to be driver_related. In your opinion, should
I drive her...er...it to say, Bakersfield, or should I simply treat
with virtual flowers and soft elevator musak?
Respectfully,
Billy (Just a sec Ma...I ain't done yet!) Gates
--
Marc J. Nelson
Sim Racing News - http://www.simnews.com
<remove '_*_' before replying>
Quoted text (15 lines)
> Wow, you guys are incredibly f***en funny. So are your brothers here on > r.a.s. You don't like the sim. We ALL know that you don't like it. We've > heard you say it over and over and over and...... If you don't like CPR, > then why not shut up about it and move on with your lives. Maybe try > actually talking to a real live girl. If you are too shy, contact your > favorite sim developer, stick your tongue down the back of their trousers, > and I'm sure they will make you a really great sim woman that you can play > with every day and then come to r.a.s. and tell us why it's the best and > everyone else's sim woman sucks. I know you must be the ultimate experts on > that subject as well. Also, don't forget to throw in quite a few of those > clever, sarcastic comments that you think are so entertaining. > All My Love, > Dave (Not a Blatantly Obvious Microsoft Hater) FisherI hope so, since CPR does have quite a lot of redeeming features -
driving just isn't numbered among them.
I'm not sure I'd agree with "really not that bad", since I truly think
it is that bad, but I still hope for a version 2 which addresses the
shortcomings. CPR has a lot to like about it, but unfortunately the
problems were in key areas such as handling and frame-rate which
essentially killed it.
I've yet to enjoy any form of driving in CPR except for hotlapping
alone around Surfer's Paradise, and it is the only sim I can ever
recall that happening with. I even spent many happy weeks with Monster
Truck Madness! :-)
Here's to a quality Version 2 <clink of glasses> :-)
Cheers!
John
% >I admire your optimism, and I hope for the best as well -- but what
% >about the people who paid good money (pre-Bargain Bin!) for version 1?
% >Do you think it's likely that Microsoft will give v1's involuntary beta
% >testers some kind of price break on the hypothetical v2? As it has never
% >happened before, to my knowledge, it would seem likely that those who
% MS routinely gives rebate coupons ($10 or $20 I forget which) to previous
% owners of MS Flightsim. I would expect the same here. With all the sales
% around Xmas a FS-95 owner could have upgraded to FS-98 for only $19.
With the developing team of CPR gone from MS, what is the "real"
likelihood of there being a version 2 from MS? It would almost seem
that the "dumping" of the current product could be an indication that MS
has decided not to pursue version 2. I highly doubt that they would be
dumping the product only 4 months in to it's life. What happened to the
European release?
--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Perhaps. Perhaps I should of. Perhaps.
I would of thought a two year old could understand my comments but I'll try
to explain. Basically, the SAME 8 people have been making the SAME dumb ass,
sarcastic, trying to be amusing but failing, boring, repetitive, childish,
exaggerated, misinformed, comments for the past three months concerning CPR.
They just did it again in their replies to my posting. The fact that they
would harbor such deep resentment towards a piece of software and
continually take time out of their lives to attack it on a newsgroup would
lead any person, with the slightest bit of COMMON SENSE, to see that these
morons probably need to get out of the house sometime. They don't even have
to talk to a girl. Maybe they could just pick up the leaves in the garden?
So if you and the others who responded to my post still don't understand,
disliking a game does not mean you don't have a life. Wasting large amounts
of time whining about it does. I'm familiar with the name John Wallace on
this newsgroup and his opinions about CPR. We disagree almost completely but
at least he makes a point without a load of bullshit tossed in and then
moves on. The people I'm talking about are unable to do the same.
If you want to bring psychology into the discussion, then I wonder what
Freud would think of people who have a very strange, deep resentment and
dislike of, (of all things on earth and in history to dislike) a software
company. I'm talking about the blatant Microsoft haters. It's hard to
believe how ridiculous this little group of people, scattered throughout
the world, appear with their mission to attack the Evil Empire. THAT is
where the repetitive attacks on CPR are based and most people know it.
Again, common sense. Even Freud would probably just kick them in the ass and
say "Get over it!!".
David G Fisher
> >The fact that they would harbor such deep resentment towards a piece of software>>
David--
Ever stop to consider that maybe, just MAYBE, what they really resent
is:
A. Spending money for an unfinished, and maybe NEVER-finished product.
B. Having Microsoft blow in here and announce to everyone that they're
going to produce "the greatest racing sim ever made," and then blow it
by rushing a half-baked product out the door in time for Christmas,
then...
C. Whine and run away when their collapsed souffl nets them
well-deserved howls of derision and anger (would YOU pay 50 bucks for a
collapsed souffl), then...
D. Blame everything on some sort of "Anti-Microsoft Cabal", intent on
kicking Bill's sand castle in his face. That's kind of like the
"Worldwide Monolithic Communism" we used to hear about in the '60s,
primarily as an excuse to waste our own military's lives in inexcusable
foreign adventures that had more to do with money than with
(self-determination". I assure you, I loathe Microsoft for what seem to
me to be very good technical reasons, but I don't know any of the other
people in this NG who feel as I do about CPR, and I hardly have time for
Cabals these days.
Just for the sake of hypothesis, think about those points. Then count
the many messages Microsoft has posted in this newsgroup following the
release of their last lame "patch" (at last count, I've seen -0-, zero,
zilch, nada, nothing). Then ask out loud (remember, Microsoft is
maintaining a presence in this newsgroup to help you, the little guy...)
when, or *if*, Microsoft is going to release a version that actually
works AS ADVERTISED, and what they're going to do for those suckers who
paid to become unwilling and unwitting beta testers for one of the
world's largest corporations.
Do me another favor: don't hold you breath waiting for an answer from MS
-- you're likely to hurt yourself.
Bart Brown
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/deskapps/games/public/precisionracing/cart/tr...
or/cpredit.zip
Quoted text (19 lines)
>Randy BORL wrote >>I understand the venom directed towards CPR, particularly given the hype >for >>it, but its really not that bad. Its just not done yet. >Well, that's the big point why I consider C:PR a flop. It should had been >finished. >Btw, anybody thinks here that the darn track editor was only words. I would >not be surprised to see the track editor was only on paper, nothing else. >Heck I remember Dean saying "We will release the track editor very very >soon". Hmmm it was 3months ago. I think they lied to us just to make us >think they are actually working to make the game better <g>. >Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard on NROS> Sponsored by http://www.awpss.com/ >May the downforce be with you and Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-) >- Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s. >- Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking) >- Excuse me for being provocative (I'm dumb speaking)It's kind of funny, all the "good" reviews of cpr have nothing but praise
for every aspect of the game. It even won sport game of the year in one of
the major publications. Unfortunately, none of the reviews ever talk about
lack of flags, or the poor AI, or the poor frame rates, or the auto driving
in the pits, or the controllability issues. Oh well, at least it looks
good. Thats what real gamers want, right?
>>I understand the venom directed towards CPR, particularly given the hype for
>>it, but its really not that bad. Its just not done yet. I hold out some hope
>>that MS will do a competitive analysis with sims like F1RS and put out a
>>version 2 that will make us all forgive them for the shortcomings of version 1
Quoted text (18 lines)
>I hope so, since CPR does have quite a lot of redeeming features - >driving just isn't numbered among them. >I'm not sure I'd agree with "really not that bad", since I truly think >it is that bad, but I still hope for a version 2 which addresses the >shortcomings. CPR has a lot to like about it, but unfortunately the >problems were in key areas such as handling and frame-rate which >essentially killed it. >I've yet to enjoy any form of driving in CPR except for hotlapping >alone around Surfer's Paradise, and it is the only sim I can ever >recall that happening with. I even spent many happy weeks with Monster >Truck Madness! :-) >Here's to a quality Version 2 <clink of glasses> :-) >Cheers! >JohnI kind of resent what you say in this post. Yes, I am one who bashes cpr.
I think there is good reason, but I've said enough before and won't "waste
time out of my life" to explain the reasons again. Many people have a
ligitimate gripe with the product. Look what we have to compare it too?
GP2, with one of the best AI's in the racing sim business. ICR2, one of the
pioneers, and still the best, along with Nascar2. Even the graphics in
Psygnosis's F1 are better than cpr with better frame rates. And by the way,
I get out once in a while, as a matter of fact, I race on an international
level, so that might explain why I get upset when a "sim" behaves this bad.
And I own stock in Microsoft. I want them to make lots of money for a long
time to come. I just don't like cpr, and if I can save someone some of that
precious hardearned cash by making him or her aware of an inferior product,
I'm going to take time out of my life to do it.
>I hope so, since CPR does have quite a lot of redeeming features -
>driving just isn't numbered among them.
I guess we'll agree to disagree -- in my opinion, you didn't try hard
enough <ducking> :)
Handling is now a little more difficult than F1RS, mainly because F1RS
cars are inherently (and unrealistically) stable. You can line up the
car and let go of the wheel and it drives itself in a perfectly
straight line on the straights. Great for a BMW, but for a F1 car
going over a bumpy circuit at 150+mph? And you have to be more
gradual with the throttle on turn exits than you do on F1RS, but the
engine is more peaky so its easy to get 'sudden wheelspin' in F1RS.
Frame rate isn't a problem for me, running on a P300. When I didn't
have the 3DFX, its frame rates were more smooth than those of F1RS
D3D, because the latter got hiccups quite a bit more (this is gone in
the Glide version).
Oh well.
Yup.
Randy
Randy Magruder
Contributing Reviewer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com
Well, thank you for the info. Lol just when I make relive the track
editor on r.a.s. they decide to put it out +ADs--) Maybe it's not only a
matter of timing. (hehe).
It's time to take out C:PR out of the shelves and see how this can bring my
Cart experience to a higher level. High that level could be presently.
My first try will be the Gilles Villeneuve track (more knows has the
Montreal F1 Grand Prix). Hopefully the editor is simple as SODA's one.
+AD4-John wrote
+AD4-Ok, it came out sooner than I thought :-) You can get the track editor from
+AD4-The APEX http://cart.gamestats.com
+AD4-You will also find information on this page to help you with editing
tracks.
Fran+AOc-ois M+AOk-nard +ADw-ymenard on NROS+AD4- Sponsored by http://www.awpss.com/
May the downforce be with you and Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-)
- Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
- Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking)
- Excuse me for being provocative (I'm dumb speaking)
A local store here in Stuttgart, Germany has it since Monday, so I guess
it will be available in other countries in the next days.
Holger Reinhardt
Whjat kind of wierd *** theory is this now? I've seen literally
dozens of people harshly criticizing CPR (mostly for frame-rate,
handling, and AI issues) on this forum alone.
You've spent more time whining about them than they do about the game.
Guess that means you don't have a life.
I've seen almost NONE of those here, one or two (usually some kid
passing through) at most. There are a few who go into spastic
over-reaction when anyone criticizes a Microsoft product for any
reason. But I don't pretend to understand the psychology of that
particular form of madness.
Joe
My frame rates were just great, it was really cool how MS made a racing sim
that showed a series of constantly updating still shots. Hell I musta got
the thing working real good, had a frame rate of about 3-4 an hour
*snicker*...
Enjoy the greatest satisfaction ever built into a racing sim and return it
to the store like I did.
<Oh well, at least it looks good. Thats what real gamers want, right?>
I think it's the gamers' equivalent of the old hot rod adage: "if it
don't go, CHROME it!"
Bart Brown
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:34:57 GMT, "Ken Beard"
One more "factual" point (lest DAVID G. FISHER thinks I'm part of
the "vast right wing ***"):
You can find a printable copy of the rebate slip on the MS CPR web
pages (URL below). So even if the copy you buy doesn't have the
sticker on it, you can get the rebate. The rebate is effective on
purchases dated 2/15/98 - 9/30/98.
[link lost in import]
I'll now leave it to the "loyalist forces" and the members of the
"anti-Microsoft cabal" to debate whether those dates indicate that CPR
2 will be released in October (extra credit for Joe if he can
determine if October constitutes "late 1998") or if it will just take
that long to unload this stinker...
Hey, guys, its just a game! ;)
Before you send me UCE, I know what you're thinking... Did he complain
to five or six postmasters last month? Now, you must ask yourself one
question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do you, punk?
Quoted text (7 lines)
>While browsing for other stuff at CompUSA today, I noticed that CPR is $35, >WITH a big sticker on it saying $20 rebate from MS that I don't recall >seeing before. Same sticker on the ones at Best Buy down the road but they >were still $49, unless they hadn't changed the price sticker on the shelf >(not uncommon). >So CPR can be had for an effective $15 or so if you look around.On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 15:44:54 +0000, Barton Spencer Brown
(edit)
Bart, I love it! "Involuntary beta testers"! Excuse
the expropriation if I decide to start using the
phase in my signature.
BTW, I intend never to buy another MS product
if I can reasonably avoid it. I'm not a Microsoft-hater,
I'm just not a glutton for punishment. Companies
whose Support is UnSupportive only***me once.
Except for AST, who screwed me so many times by
the purchase of a single computer as to make a
prison gang*** seem like high tea. But that's
another story....
Michael Tracy
>T2ssIGl0IGNhbWUgb3V0IHNvb25lciB0aGFuIEkgdGhvdWdodCA6LSkgWW91IGNhbiBnZXQgdGhl
>IHRyYWNrIGVkaXRvciBmcm9tDQoNClRoZSBBUEVYIGh0dHA6Ly9jYXJ0LmdhbWVzdGF0cy5jb20N
>Cg0KWW91IHdpbGwgYWxzbyBmaW5kIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIG9uIHRoaXMgcGFnZSB0byBoZWxwIHlv
>dSB3aXRoIGVkaXRpbmcgdHJhY2tzLg0KDQpUaGFua3MNCkpvaG4NCg0KSm9obiB3cm90ZSBpbiBt
>ZXNzYWdlICtBRHctNmQyamUzK0FDUS1xcHIrQUNRLTErQUVBLW5ld3MxLndvcmxkY2hhdC5...
How rude. And a BmaW5kIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIG9uIHRoaXM right back at you,
sir! ;-)
Joe
>I guess we'll agree to disagree -- in my opinion, you didn't try hard
>enough <ducking> :)
You better :-) When I think of the hours I spent (wasted?) trying to
get the damn thing to respond in a realistic, fun or enjoyable manner,
oooo I could.......something! ;-)
Cheers!
John
CPR eventually was released in England on Friday 20th Feb. I had been
phoning MS regularly sionce before xmas trying to find out when the release
date was and it kept on getting delayed.
I thought the hold up might have been due to MS attempting to put right some
of the problems from the originally released version (which I have read
about here). Having now had a brief chance to have a go I don't think
anything has been changed, so the reason for the hold-up seems a little
strange.
--
Peter Hooper
>With the developing team of CPR gone from MS, what is the "real"
>likelihood of there being a version 2 from MS? It would almost seem
>that the "dumping" of the current product could be an indication that MS
>has decided not to pursue version 2. I highly doubt that they would be
>dumping the product only 4 months in to it's life. What happened to the
>European release?
>--
>**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
> Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Quoted text (8 lines)
> On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 15:44:54 +0000, Barton Spencer Brown > (edit) > >Do you think it's likely that Microsoft will give v1's involuntary beta > >testers some kind of price break on the hypothetical v2? > Bart, I love it! "Involuntary beta testers"!> One more "factual" point (lest DAVID G. FISHER thinks I'm part of
>the "vast right wing ***"):
> You can find a printable copy of the rebate slip on the MS CPR web...
No, Jeff. I never said anything about a "right wing ***". What I said
was that the same people: Yourself, Barton S.B., Ronald S., Byron F., Randy
B., Tim, and Greg C., respond with basically the same comments to almost
every posting related to CPR. There must be hundreds of regulars who post
comments on sims here at r.a.s. but for some reason these names are so easy
to recall. Maybe you can explain why.
This is getting boring. The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are
enjoying CPR and I hope that doesn't upset you.
Dave
<<The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are enjoying CPR>>
I'm sure the marketing research is available to back that particular
claim, no? I won't climb in *that* leaky boat and pass of my opinion as
fact, but my opinion is that if many -- if not *most* -- well-seasoned
sim veterans in this NG find CPR to be (to put it as charitably as
possible) a flawed product, how do you think John Q. Christmas Daddy is
making out with it?
Considering that after two obviously less-than-successful patches and a
LOT of work by people who actually know what they're doing the sim STILL
doesn't work as advertised, and considering that most of the "thousands
of people" who just fell over themselves in the week before Christmas to
buy this sim haven't the slightest idea those patches even exist, and
still have the original, unpatched version -- which even Microsoft
admits doesn't work right -- well, how many of those thousands do you
suppose have trashed the game already, or set it aside as unplayable,
where it will gather dust until they forget about it? People subscribing
to this NG are an unusual lot, as far as games go -- they REALLY care
about them, and they'll put in the time and energy to make them work.
Your average week-before-Christmas buyer is not of that ilk, and will
simply discard what doesn't work, usually blaming his or her own
ineptness.
If thousands of people are enjoying this game (not counting the
reviewers of commercial magazines that rely on advertising dollars for
their very existence), their silence is deafening.
Bart Brown
Quoted text (39 lines)
> > Hmm............... interesting conection, wonder what Mr. Freud would > >think. If you don't like something you should immediately find a girl. To > >what? Talk to her about it? Take it out on her? > > Just because somebody is pissed off at the quality of a game you assume > >they need a life? Perhaps next time you sit down to write something, you > >should perhaps think, a least a little bit, first. > > Bobby Upward > Perhaps. Perhaps I should of. Perhaps. > I would of thought a two year old could understand my comments but I'll try > to explain. Basically, the SAME 8 people have been making the SAME dumb ass, > sarcastic, trying to be amusing but failing, boring, repetitive, childish, > exaggerated, misinformed, comments for the past three months concerning CPR. > They just did it again in their replies to my posting. The fact that they > would harbor such deep resentment towards a piece of software and > continually take time out of their lives to attack it on a newsgroup would > lead any person, with the slightest bit of COMMON SENSE, to see that these > morons probably need to get out of the house sometime. They don't even have > to talk to a girl. Maybe they could just pick up the leaves in the garden? > So if you and the others who responded to my post still don't understand, > disliking a game does not mean you don't have a life. Wasting large amounts > of time whining about it does. I'm familiar with the name John Wallace on > this newsgroup and his opinions about CPR. We disagree almost completely but > at least he makes a point without a load of bullshit tossed in and then > moves on. The people I'm talking about are unable to do the same. > If you want to bring psychology into the discussion, then I wonder what > Freud would think of people who have a very strange, deep resentment and > dislike of, (of all things on earth and in history to dislike) a software > company. I'm talking about the blatant Microsoft haters. It's hard to > believe how ridiculous this little group of people, scattered throughout > the world, appear with their mission to attack the Evil Empire. THAT is > where the repetitive attacks on CPR are based and most people know it. > Again, common sense. Even Freud would probably just kick them in the ass and > say "Get over it!!". > David G FisherOn Thu, 26 Feb 1998 18:25:40 +0000, Barton Spencer Brown
A scholar and a gentleman!
Michael Tracy
------------------------------------------------------
Lisa: "That's specious reasoning!"
Homer: "Thanks, honey."
------------------------------------------------------
Quoted text (14 lines)
>> On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 15:44:54 +0000, Barton Spencer Brown >> (edit) >> >Do you think it's likely that Microsoft will give v1's involuntary beta >> >testers some kind of price break on the hypothetical v2? >> Bart, I love it! "Involuntary beta testers"! >Michael-- >I hereby bequeath it to you ;) >BartOn Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:08:58 +0000, Barton Spencer Brown
%% how do you think John Q. Christmas Daddy is
%making out with it?
%
Bart,
You aren't going to *believe* this, but I ran into him the other
night..
Turns out, he hates the thing too!
He said to tell you hi, <btw> ;-I
-Rob
Quoted text (11 lines)
> > One more "factual" point (lest DAVID G. FISHER thinks I'm part of > >the "vast right wing ***"): > > You can find a printable copy of the rebate slip on the MS CPR web... > No, Jeff. I never said anything about a "right wing ***". What I said > was that the same people: Yourself, Barton S.B., Ronald S., Byron F., Randy > B., Tim, and Greg C., respond with basically the same comments to almost > every posting related to CPR. There must be hundreds of regulars who post > comments on sims here at r.a.s. but for some reason these names are so easy > to recall. Maybe you can explain why.> >I guess we'll agree to disagree -- in my opinion, you didn't try hard
> >enough <ducking> :)
> You better :-) When I think of the hours I spent (wasted?) trying to
> get the damn thing to respond in a realistic, fun or enjoyable manner,
> oooo I could.......something! ;-)
Same here, and when I think about the time I didn't spend with F1RS
because
of my preference for CART Racing, it's even worse...
l8er
ronny
--
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!
> This is getting boring. The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are
> enjoying CPR and I hope that doesn't upset you.
Hundreds of thousands of people are enjoying crack, but it doesn't make
me want to run out and get some. And if it's volume that denotes
quality, then don't overlook the fact that billions of flies are
enjoying shit at this very moment.
Trips
Quoted text (7 lines)
>My frame rates were just great, it was really cool how MS made a racing sim >that showed a series of constantly updating still shots. Hell I musta got >the thing working real good, had a frame rate of about 3-4 an hour >*snicker*... >Enjoy the greatest satisfaction ever built into a racing sim and return it >to the store like I did.Quoted text (9 lines)
> Bart, > You aren't going to *believe* this, but I ran into him the other > night.. > Turns out, he hates the thing too! > He said to tell you hi, <btw> ;-I > -RobQuoted text (16 lines)
> > One more "factual" point (lest DAVID G. FISHER thinks I'm part of > >the "vast right wing ***"): > > You can find a printable copy of the rebate slip on the MS CPR web... > No, Jeff. I never said anything about a "right wing ***". What I said > was that the same people: Yourself, Barton S.B., Ronald S., Byron F., Randy > B., Tim, and Greg C., respond with basically the same comments to almost > every posting related to CPR. There must be hundreds of regulars who post > comments on sims here at r.a.s. but for some reason these names are so easy > to recall. Maybe you can explain why. > This is getting boring. The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are > enjoying CPR and I hope that doesn't upset you. > Dave<snip>
So Michael, we are to understand that your experience with AST was not
entirely pleasant? <VBG>
Ken
Quoted text (14 lines)
>Bart, I love it! "Involuntary beta testers"! Excuse >the expropriation if I decide to start using the >phase in my signature. >BTW, I intend never to buy another MS product >if I can reasonably avoid it. I'm not a Microsoft-hater, >I'm just not a glutton for punishment. Companies >whose Support is UnSupportive only***me once. >Except for AST, who screwed me so many times by >the purchase of a single computer as to make a >prison gang*** seem like high tea. But that's >another story.... >Michael TracyQuoted text (9 lines)
> > This is getting boring. The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are > > enjoying CPR and I hope that doesn't upset you. > Hundreds of thousands of people are enjoying crack, but it doesn't make > me want to run out and get some. And if it's volume that denotes > quality, then don't overlook the fact that billions of flies are > enjoying shit at this very moment. > TripsThe thing is I love cart, so much that I bought it the first day it was out here
in Texas. I can't stand it. Too bad I didn't wait until now and only spend $15.
--
Thank You
Marc Johnson
Outside of a dog, a book is a mans best friend. Inside a dog, it is too dark to
read -Mark Twain
Quoted text (22 lines)
> > > This is getting boring. The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are > > > enjoying CPR and I hope that doesn't upset you. > > Hundreds of thousands of people are enjoying crack, but it doesn't make > > me want to run out and get some. And if it's volume that denotes > > quality, then don't overlook the fact that billions of flies are > > enjoying shit at this very moment. > > Trips > LOL. It seems to me that the thousands David is talking about are so > CART fanatical that they'd say any CART sim was great. But I don't > understand this at all. Lucky for you all, I'm not an American and thus > not quite as big a CART fan as I otherwise would be. Otherwise, believe > me, I'd be a whole lot worse than you think I am now! On the other hand, > online racing at the Zone would be a lot more useful so I may be a > little calmer - just a little :) > -- > We are the Hosh! You will be assimilated! Lower your defences > and surrender! Your technological and biological distinctiveness > will be added to our own. Your culture will be adapted to > service us. Resistance is futile. Have a nice &*($ing day!What u said Byron!!!!! You echo the sentiments of many. As for this clown
trying to defend MS....well, give it up buddy. I happen to be someone who
likes MS, they have a lot of great products, but CPR aint one of them...
&BTW , Freud was a ***ed idiot, who couldn't get his mind off his
mother's crotch.
Quoted text (11 lines)
> >My frame rates were just great, it was really cool how MS made a racing sim > >that showed a series of constantly updating still shots. Hell I musta got > >the thing working real good, had a frame rate of about 3-4 an hour > >*snicker*... > >Enjoy the greatest satisfaction ever built into a racing sim and return it > >to the store like I did. > If your frame rate is that bad, buy a new computer > Randy>> > One more "factual" point (lest DAVID G. FISHER thinks I'm part of
>> >the "vast right wing ***"):
>> > You can find a printable copy of the rebate slip on the MS CPR web...
>> No, Jeff. I never said anything about a "right wing ***". What I said
>> was that the same people: Yourself, Barton S.B., Ronald S., Byron F., Randy
>> B., Tim, and Greg C., respond with basically the same comments to almost
>> every posting related to CPR. There must be hundreds of regulars who post
>> comments on sims here at r.a.s. but for some reason these names are so easy
>> to recall. Maybe you can explain why.
>> This is getting boring. The last thing I'll say is thousands of people are
Patches that are arguably worse, hehehehe Whats that game you are playing
that is on its 7th patch and people are still complaining!
Ohhhh, I shouldnt say this stuff right now, Atleast untill I have tried the
Demo for 2 min, and become an Expert reviewer like you Byron. But I did try
to run the demo, and the damn thing didnt run :)
Quoted text (16 lines)
>> enjoying CPR and I hope that doesn't upset you. >> Dave > Well Dave, speaking for myself, I don't (as I recall) break into a >thread where constructive criticism/discussion is happening. Maybe when >it first came out I may have a little but more just to let people know >than to ridicule anyone. It's just such a joke to me that it's hard not >to have a laugh about it and if someone posts a comment that purely >praises CPR then what would you expect. It's an irresistable flame! I >also hate to see people whine about those of us that show CPR in it's >true light since the people who hammer CPR are dead right and the more >we can hurt the rep/sales of this game the better for us all. Never >forget that the rudest player in this game is MICROSOFT! Call us >different but the selling of alpha's goes over like a lead balloon. Not >to mention patches that are arguably worse.1. Demo requires a 3Dfx card.
2. 7th patch is almost perfect. I have never seen a _game_ like this ULTRA
realism.
3. CPR SUX
> Patches that are arguably worse, hehehehe Whats that game you are playing
> that is on its 7th patch and people are still complaining!
> Ohhhh, I shouldnt say this stuff right now, Atleast untill I have tried the
> Demo for 2 min, and become an Expert reviewer like you Byron. But I did try
> to run the demo, and the damn thing didnt run :)
7th patch is almost perfect
Well I would hope so!
playing
>> that is on its 7th patch and people are still complaining!
>> Ohhhh, I shouldnt say this stuff right now, Atleast untill I have tried the
>> Demo for 2 min, and become an Expert reviewer like you Byron. But I did try
>> to run the demo, and the damn thing didnt run :)


































