>'scuse me... you are seriously clue-deficient.
>Programmers who are trying to force fit their designs to a
>Win95 API are certainly not lazy. They are tearing their hair out.
>Win95 is NOT easily programmable for games....
According to id and LucasArts folks for example, Win95/NT is much
easier for a games programmer than MS-DOS.
>And the basic fact still is that even with Voodoo this or Rendition
>that, *nobody's'* personal computer is even vaguely as good as a N64
>at 3D rendering.
That is a misconception, not a fact. A P133 with a 3Dfx card is much
more powerful in 3D rendering than a N64. Take for example the N64-2-PC
ports like SOTE and Turok, they have better 3D graphics on a 3Dfx
Pentium machine (same graphical effects, same or more speed, and four
times the resolution).
Why would he? Quite on the contrary, as Sega's next console will use a
DirectX variant from Microsoft. I don't think BG hates the money he
gets from that deal, does he?
