"Slug" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Is this the ISI F12001 graphics engine? I ask because the lighting and
> shadows seems to look rather flat to me. I know it's an alpha but it all
> looks dark and flat on my 9800pro. Cars look nice with spectral lighting
> from the outside view though. The tracks show no shadows from trees and
> buildings though.
F1C I think.
"John Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:TAanc.63580$hR1.38312
@fe2.texas.rr.com:
> F1C I think.
The official name of the engine is Motor 1.0. Think of it as F1c +
NT2k4 + a few more bits and pieces added on.
So it's an evolution of the F1c engine, but at least 2 steps beyond.
dave henrie
Is this the ISI F12001 graphics engine? I ask because the lighting and
shadows seems to look rather flat to me. I know it's an alpha but it all
looks dark and flat on my 9800pro. Cars look nice with spectral lighting
from the outside view though. The tracks show no shadows from trees and
buildings though.
> > F1C I think.
>
> The official name of the engine is Motor 1.0. Think of it as F1c +
> NT2k4 + a few more bits and pieces added on.
> So it's an evolution of the F1c engine, but at least 2 steps beyond.
It's certainly not as flashy as TRD2 which has real-time reflections etc but
it does the job and looks nice. They need to work on the sunshine fx a bit
so that it doesn't look so gloomy.
On Mon, 10 May 2004 11:07:57 +1000, "Damien Evans" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>It's certainly not as flashy as TRD2 which has real-time reflections etc but
>it does the job and looks nice. They need to work on the sunshine fx a bit
>so that it doesn't look so gloomy.
>
Perhaps the demo is using overcast skies. It sure looks overcast
anyway.
