This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
--------------ms09D98DB657164CF38CF7561A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On a previous post many of you liked the Diamond Stealth with the
Monster 3dfx, but I am wondering if this one is better?
Matrox Millimeum II PCI 8mb with the Monster 3dfx. Is this newest
matrox capable of being a 2d card?
Thanks
--------------ms09D98DB657164CF38CF7561A
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
<encoded_portion_removed>
fTvOZNxE6k/JTYU4h6dsJS7xpFrwvmfbJDMIpBqX6Y4EfFDUlNc3Fw==
--------------ms09D98DB657164CF38CF7561A--
Matrox cards have always been the best at 2D .. also according to
benchmarks, the 3D rates on their Mystique 220 are faster then a lot of 3dfx
cards, but they don't look as good . (no bi-linear filtering, ect.) They
have a new add-on 3d card called the m3d that will work with the Millinium
or any other card for that matter. The m3d will work with Quake 2 as well.
Quoted text (7 lines)
>On a previous post many of you liked the Diamond Stealth with the >Monster 3dfx, but I am wondering if this one is better? >Matrox Millimeum II PCI 8mb with the Monster 3dfx. Is this newest >matrox capable of being a 2d card? >ThanksThere is nothing faster in DOS than the TSENG Labs 6000 chips...aka STB
Lightspeed 128 or the Herc Dynamite 128 as a few examples...the Lightspeed
128 is actually faster than the Millenium in windows at lower colors e.g 256
which most games ply at anyhow...
>Matrox cards have always been the best at 2D .. also according to
>benchmarks, the 3D rates on their Mystique 220 are faster then a lot of 3dfx
