Can anyone tell me the best combination to get a good compromise
between frame rate and good graphics (i.e. eye candy)?
Take the a out of neat to send an email.
> > Can anyone tell me the best combination to get a good compromise
> > between frame rate and good graphics (i.e. eye candy)?
> > Take the a out of neat to send an email.
What kinda system you got?
-DG-
I also set most things on, take the sky off, run in SVGA with auto adjust
on and set the intended frame rate for around 18-20fps. Same chip, and an
old graphics card (DS Video Vram 2Mb), and game works well. A good track to
test on is Monte Carlo.
Have fun!
Dan
> Can anyone tell me the best combination to get a good compromise
> between frame rate and good graphics (i.e. eye candy)?
> Take the a out of neat to send an email.
I run all of the graphics exept the sky. I get around 17 FPS on my 200
MHZMMX with that setting.
I've got a K6 200 (clocked to 225) with 32Mb SDram and gp2 runs great
with everything on except the sky in svga mode, I get estimated and
actual 25fps no probs.
slowdown.
GP2 flies with a 200MHz plus cpu!!!!
d:~))
**Peter**
Quoted text (7 lines)
> > Can anyone tell me the best combination to get a good compromise > > between frame rate and good graphics (i.e. eye candy)? > > Take the a out of neat to send an email. > I run all of the graphics exept the sky. I get around 17 FPS on my > 200 > MHZMMX with that setting.-You should turn off all mirror textures (don't need them)
- turn off sky (don't need it)
- set the desired framerate about 2 lower than the estimated
maybe give some smaller details up and you should be able to have a Processor
Occupancy of <100% on all tracks but Monaco
JoH
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
When everything else failed, we can still become im-
mortal by making an enormous blunder....
John Kenneth Galbraith
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
