I want to improve the performance of GP2 with a faster processor. I know
the K6 chip isn't so hot at FPU as a Pentium - but just what difference is
there? Is the GP2 performance of the K6-233 better than a Pentium-166MMX
or Pentium-200MMX for instance? Anyone got experience using a K6 with GP2?
What good timing you have?
I have just bought (two weeks ago) a K6 200 and tried it with gp2 and it
is a vast improvement over my old pc (a 486 DX4 100).
The graphics can be turned all the way up (except for the sky) and gp2
runs fine at 25 fps, even at Monaco.
Although obviously the cpu occupancy takes a bit of a dive at graphic
intensive tracks such as Monaco?
But in my experience a K6 200 works great with gp2.
Now for the even better news.....
I have just overclocked my K6 to run at 233Mhz, and so far it is running
fine, with no probs.
And the performance with gp2 has improved too.
The k6 is not the be all and end all as far as cpu's go, but if you look
at the performance you get per pound (or dollar) it's very hard to beat?
I am very happy with mine, especially now that I have successfully
clocked it!!!!!!
Get one TODAY.....
d:~))
**Peter**
I have both a system with K6-233 and Pentium 233MMX overclocked to 266MMX.
The K6 runs a little faster than the overclocked Intel 233MMX. Hands down
winner is K6 because you don't have to overclock it to get the performance.
Quoted text (25 lines)
> What good timing you have? > I have just bought (two weeks ago) a K6 200 and tried it with gp2 and it > is a vast improvement over my old pc (a 486 DX4 100). > The graphics can be turned all the way up (except for the sky) and gp2 > runs fine at 25 fps, even at Monaco. > Although obviously the cpu occupancy takes a bit of a dive at graphic > intensive tracks such as Monaco? > But in my experience a K6 200 works great with gp2. > Now for the even better news..... > I have just overclocked my K6 to run at 233Mhz, and so far it is running > fine, with no probs. > And the performance with gp2 has improved too. > The k6 is not the be all and end all as far as cpu's go, but if you look > at the performance you get per pound (or dollar) it's very hard to beat? > I am very happy with mine, especially now that I have successfully > clocked it!!!!!! > Get one TODAY..... > d:~)) > **Peter**On Sat, 09 Aug 1997 14:33:51 -0400, Ken Beard
>> I have just bought (two weeks ago) a K6 200 and tried it with gp2 and it
>> is a vast improvement over my old pc (a 486 DX4 100). [snip]
>> The k6 is not the be all and end all as far as cpu's go, but if you look
>> at the performance you get per pound (or dollar) it's very hard to beat?
>Got to agree here - haven't done in-depth testing but ICR2, Nascar 2 and
>EF2000 2.0 (G+) Rendition versions are faster, as is GP2 compared to my
>Cyrix P/150 o/c'd to 200.
Ken-
This is great news, but I'm confused about something. Does
ICR2/Rendition work with the K2? I thought it had a check for
Intel-only, and that it dropped down to a slower (non-DMA?) mode when
something other than an Intel chip was present.
If ICR2/Rendition works normally with the K6, I'll be kicking myself,
because I just bought a P-166 for the same price I would have paid for a
K6 200!
Alison
Remove the spam blocker NOSPAM to email me.
http://www.nh.ultranet.com/~alison
Start kicking....
The K6 works fantastic in all these games.
KIck twice. Intel dropped prices of 166MMX to that of 166vanila.


































