Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing

Does anybody have the Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing or indycar racing 2 ?? please reply J.v.Wissen

> Does anybody have the Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing or indycar > racing 2 ?? > please reply > J.v.Wissen Bill Sheets Indianapolis Indiana

> Does anybody have the Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing or indycar > racing 2 ?? > please reply > J.v.Wissen If you want the track for Icr2 just relply to me. Thamks a lot, Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-) ________________________ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ SPEED- Public relations director SPEED- Cars, WC, BGN, Trucks, IROC, utilities and more... SPEED- http://www.sim-speed.com/ Flight Cadet Nien Numb, Gold squadron NSWL http://www.dpliv.com/dragon/Gold/index.html May the force be with you, always!! - *Excuse me for my poor English(I'm French speaking) * -

Quoted text (13 lines)

> > Does anybody have the Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing or indycar > > racing 2 ?? > > please reply > > J.v.Wissen > If you want the track for Icr2 just relply to me. Thamks a lot, > Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-) ________________________ > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hey! He is still here! And still exhibiting the behaviour that got him the roasting of a lifetime. Incredible..... Keith -- Think before you Spam... "By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited adverti***t to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation."

: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sorry, but there cannot be an "official" leader of r.a.s. If you want to be taken seriously, please understand that there has been no "official" business conducted to make you or anyone else the leader of r.a.s. Show some maturity and toss that mantle. -- **************************** Michael E. Carver ************************* Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > Does anybody have the Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing or indycar > > racing 2 ?? > If you want the track for Icr2 just relply to me. Thamks a lot, > Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-) ________________________ > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Looks more like you're the official Pirate of R.A.S. Others paid hard-earned money to own a legit version of the track- what gives you the right to peddle illegal copies? God Bless, Steve

Quoted text (11 lines)

> > Does anybody have the Indyanapolis track for Indycar racing or indycar > > racing 2 ?? > > please reply > > J.v.Wissen > If you want the track for Icr2 just relply to me. Thamks a lot, > Good race at the Brickyard, (-o-) ________________________

Does official leader include taking responsibility for distributing copywrited materials illegally? If so, we've got a born ruler here. I hope this isn't misinterpreted as honesty, Craig Jacobson

you legal geeks are sickening! if papy would re-publish the indy track pak, we would have the opportunity to buy it...

I Got Into sim racing just last year Summer time long after IMS Track went off market & I looked From Hong Kong which just about has every Pc game accept IMS to *** London which is out what I'm I suposed to do never get the dammed thing & nobody who owns it is willing to sell at reasonable price that I've contacted so there blow it out your ass.

>you legal geeks are sickening! >if papy would re-publish the indy track pak, we would >have the opportunity to buy it... Pull your head outt of your rectum and read the posts. Papy _no longer_ has the rights to republish IMS. They _cannot_ get the rights for a long time too, if I am correct. <<lurk mode: on>>

: you legal geeks are sickening! : if papy would re-publish the indy track pak, we would : have the opportunity to buy it... And if they could, they would. But since the can't, they won't. -- **************************** Michael E. Carver ************************* Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Welcome to the real world buddy: you can't have it all. Live with it. If you wanted to buy a '58 Corvette, but nobody would sell it to you, would you steal it? -- Formula T2 Upgrade Page - http://huizen.dds.nl/~jjcox

> > I Got Into sim racing just last year Summer time long after IMS Track went > > off market & I looked From Hong Kong which just about has every Pc game > > accept IMS to *** London which is out what I'm I suposed to do never > > get the dammed thing & nobody who owns it is willing to sell at reasonable > > price that I've contacted so there blow it out your ass.email your address I will send it to you free M, I hope someone comes along and steals YOUR work by giving it to others without YOUR permission.

I might if a jerk like you owned it.

[snip] I don't see how this would be quite the same thing. If the program were available to be bought but rather than buying it a person gets a copy frome someone then I could see how that would be stealing from the programmer. But when the program is no longer available to be bought and a person then gets a copy he is not taking anything from the programmer because he didn't have the option to buy. How can you lose money on a sale when there is no sale to be made? Rick

Quoted text (11 lines)

> I don't see how this would be quite the same thing. If the program were > available > to be bought but rather than buying it a person gets a copy frome someone > then I could see > how that would be stealing from the programmer. But when the program is > no > longer available to be bought and a person then gets a copy he is not > taking > anything from the programmer because he didn't have the option to buy. > How > can you lose money on a sale when there is no sale to be made?

You make a valid argument. (And a similar argument to the one made by the Free Software Foundation.) I admit I have some tendencies to agree with both of them for some cases. http://www.fsf.org/fsf/fsf.html The simple legal fact of the matter is that intellectual property rights include the right to exclude others from using a piece of property (for example, the IMS track pack). The mere fact that their use of the IMS track wouldn't cause you any concrete damage is irrelevant as far as the law is concerned. The above is fact. The reality of the situation is probably that if you keep reasonably quiet and don't make a big public stink about copying IMS, you'll probably be OK, because it's just not worth trying to defend property that has no value. But, if you go out and make a big public show of copying IMS illegally, you can bet that you'll hear about it. From that and from using your own brain, decide what you want to do. I'm not your net-nanny after all... :) ---Jim

: :You make a valid argument. (And a similar argument to the one made by :the Free Software Foundation.) I admit I have some tendencies to agree :with both of them for some cases. http://www.fsf.org/fsf/fsf.html : :The simple legal fact of the matter is that intellectual property rights :include the right to exclude others from using a piece of property (for :example, the IMS track pack). The mere fact that their use of the IMS :track wouldn't cause you any concrete damage is irrelevant as far as the :law is concerned. : Yeah I agree that it is a violation of copyright laws. I guess my point was that nobody can say that Sierra is losing money by extra copies of IMS being made. And I also don't think you can equate it with blatant piracy or stealing, as some of those who are trying to put people on a guilt trip are doing. The only valid argument I see against it is a violation of copyright laws, which I suppose is reason enough. I was just getting kind of irked by those trying to make it more than it really is. Cheers Rick