Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

REPOST : CAR GOES AIRBORNE IN NASCAR 2 !!! - nascar2.jpg (0/1) Why do people get upset at binary posts?

4 posts by 4 people · 18 May 1997 - 20 May 1997

> R.A.S. (a discussion group) is not the proper place for binary postings. > The binary newsgroups were created for this very purpose. So if you want > to get a collection of interesting screenshots, please have the courtesy to > follow proper netiquette and post them in one of the binary groups > (alt.binaries.simulators.autos comes to mind), and ftp site, or a webpage. Not that you're upset about this, but I never understood why people get so upset about this kind of convienent posting. Claims of taking up space and bandwidth and such, I don't get it. I use Netscape to look through the posts and when I see one that's interesting (like the Nascar flip) I click on it. Is there some REAL reason that binaries should not be posted on the group of interest? Not just, your not supposed to. But a REAL reason. I find it quite conveinent and enjoyable to find pictures of interest to the group posted IN the group. Just wondering?
Eric Busch 18 May 1997#367099
It's often quite inconvienent for the System Administrators in charge of the news servers. While it's true one or two binary posts don't ammount to much, but where do you draw the line? Many small ISPs choose to olny carry discussion groups as they don't have the resources to keep up with the binaries groups. Continual posting of binaries to discussion groups can result in these ISPs to drop them to elievate the strain on their already tight resources. The binaries groups were created to give the ISPs a choice of whether or not to carry them. --
: Not that you're upset about this, but I never understood why people get : so upset about this kind of convienent posting. Claims of taking up : space and bandwidth and such, I don't get it. I use Netscape to look : through the posts and when I see one that's interesting (like the Nascar : flip) I click on it. Is there some REAL reason that binaries should not : be posted on the group of interest? Not just, your not supposed to. : But a REAL reason. I find it quite conveinent and enjoyable to find : pictures of interest to the group posted IN the group. I know that it seems that almost everyone in the world has the same setup to read newsgroups as you do. However, that is not the case. Some people still have to do it the old-fashioned way. They download a newsgroup (yes they may scan the headers before doing so, but one can't always tell that there is a large binary attached). As odd as it may seem, some people have to pay for the amount of time they are on the net. My ISP has a huge amount of money invested in equipment and that includes tons of disk space. However, at times their disks alotted to newsgroups overflows and we stop getting news until this can be taken care of. Other ISP's don't have the luxury of huge disk arrays and simply don't carry any "binary" groups because they take up tons of space. Even other ISP's have gone so far as to "throw out" articles in non-binary newsgroups that have binaries in them. They never see the light of day for some readers. On top of all of that, these binaries must be moved through the already congested "super information highway". Sure, you say, what's the difference if it's in a discussion group or a binary group, it still is pushed down the pipe. Well, as I mentioned earlier some ISP don't offer binary groups for various reasons. You are forcing them to use up valuable resources that they can't afford. Also, some ISP's may take the action to drop newsgroups that carry unwarranted binaries. There are also "binary cancelling" patrols on the net. When they find large binaries in discussion groups that message gets purged across the net. So, in point the idea of sharing the binary is lost. The binary gets destroyed before many people even get the chance to see it. Only the people who happen to have extremely fast news feeds saw this last one. Others will never see it. So why not post it in its proper place so it will stay around for people who want it? One last point, it's just plain rude. Like talking in a theatre during a movie or play. Everything has its place. r.a.s. is not the place for large binaries. alt.binaries.simulators.auto is the place for large binaries. This concludes this public service announcement. We will now continue with our regular discusions of auto racing simulations. Thank you for time. -- **************************** Michael E. Carver ************************* Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ron R. II 20 May 1997#367376
Well, for one thing, that's why I also subscribe to alt.binaries.simulators.autos Have the filters setup to catch files only having Nascar in the subject line, that way when I don't have time for binariy downloads I can check just the text groups like THIS ONE, without being stuck waiting for a file to download that I can plan time for later on when I pull headers in the file groups. My .01657 Ron
Quoted text (16 lines)>> R.A.S. (a discussion group) is not the proper place for binary postings. >> The binary newsgroups were created for this very purpose. So if you want >> to get a collection of interesting screenshots, please have the courtesy to >> follow proper netiquette and post them in one of the binary groups >> (alt.binaries.simulators.autos comes to mind), and ftp site, or a webpage. >Not that you're upset about this, but I never understood why people get >so upset about this kind of convienent posting. Claims of taking up >space and bandwidth and such, I don't get it. I use Netscape to look >through the posts and when I see one that's interesting (like the Nascar >flip) I click on it. Is there some REAL reason that binaries should not >be posted on the group of interest? Not just, your not supposed to. >But a REAL reason. I find it quite conveinent and enjoyable to find >pictures of interest to the group posted IN the group. >Just wondering?
*********************************************** ** Keep the shiny side up & the hammer down ** *** Ron Riekens II *** **** Co-Owner - Driver **** **** Maui Sunshine Raceing/*** Photography **** *** NASS BGN Series #97 Pontiac *** * [link lost in import: /~frelance/msr.html] * ***********************************************

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy