Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Interstate 76: Discussion welcome on r.a.s.??????

6 posts by 5 people · 20 Mar 1997 - 22 Mar 1997

I've been following the progress of this game for several months now and it has finally gone gold, we should see it on the shelves very soon. I have to confess I find the idea of an auto-combat action-sim very intriguing (ole' Car Wars fanatic.) and the buzz on this game is quite favorable. But my question is, will the users of r.a.s. support discussion of I76? I've read the FAQ. But I76 seems to fall into the cracks of "arcadey and action" and I tend to think the speed monsters that use r.a.s. will not want to discuss it here. ("Carmageddon" for example would not be an appropriate title to discuss, but I76 reportedly has car physics that would seem to qualify it as a sim.) I'm also a N2/ICR2-aholic, and I would like coverage of I76 *here* without venturing into the jumbled mess that is c.s.i.p.g.action. Nomex Underwear is on. Fire Away. #83 LucasFilm THX Ford Thunderbird
Jim Sokolo 20 Mar 1997#360072
>But my question is, will the users of r.a.s. support discussion of >I76? Semi-obvious side note: Realistically, there's no way to stop it. That being said, I think it's entirely appropriate for discussion of I76 to occur here. (It might be nice if we could all prefix our subject lines with the game prefix to facilitate easier "scoring/killing" of articles that didn't interest some of us.) I don't care that it's a competitor's product, and that it's probably not going for the dead-on as accurate as modern machines allow simulation of car physics, it's still a game that appeals to a lot of the crowd here, and as a practical matter this is probably the best group that currently exists for it... ---Jim Sokoloff, speaking entirely for myself.
SNIP! I guess that depends on how good the driving model in it is :-) Actually IMO I would love to hear about I-76 here on r.a.s. it would give us a nice break from the usual GP2 vs ICR2 vs Nascar2 flamefests. I already have a copy of I-76 on reserve for when it comes out, looks like a fun diversion while we wait for that GP2 patch <sarcasm> Cheers. --John -- Note: my real e-mail address is below. Delete the asterisks. ------------------------------+-------------------------- Seattle, Washington USA. | http://www.cool.com/~jsilva
Justin Rya 20 Mar 1997#360074
I don't see why I76 can't be discussed in RAS. It sounds like the perfect game for some of us who need a break from the SIMS! Especially after racing N2 at Dega for an hour then you Pit and Earnhardt rams the side of your car while your still IN THE PITS!!!(please fix this someone)
Steve Croni 21 Mar 1997#360225
As a beta tester I can testify to the realism of the physics of the cars. I defy any of you to show me a sim in which it feels more like you are driving a car and I have played them all. And if you want to remove weapons and just race, trust me there are no better tracks than those in I76. Mountains, bridges, towns, etc,etc,etc. are there to race THROUGH not just to look at from a distance as in GP2, Nascar2, Icr2. As a matter of fact one of the first single player missions pits you against your friend who wants to test your driving prowess by racing you through a serpentine dirt road, full of short cuts, wooden jumps etc, if he beats you you cannot go any further in the game(i.e. you are not good enough), but if you beat him, he directs you to follow a road(ex:route 88) for one mile and protect something(yes, you have to follow your road map). Trust me whether you are playing single player(in which you feel like your in the middle of a movie) or you are playing single player, NO GAME that I've played yet(N2, ICR2, GP2)(Duke3d,Quake) captures the e***ment of racing around in 1968-1976 muscle cars on beautiful, widespread levels(they arent really tracks because you can go anywhere you want. If you are driving on a one hundred foot high cliff and want to fly off that cliff to your death (I dont know why you would want to other than to witness it<it looks greatfrom the different camera angles>) you can do it. You have no restrictions.
Quoted text (23 lines)> I've been following the progress of this game for several months now > and it has finally gone gold, we should see it on the shelves very > soon. I have to confess I find the idea of an auto-combat action-sim > very intriguing (ole' Car Wars fanatic.) and the buzz on this game is > quite favorable. > But my question is, will the users of r.a.s. support discussion of > I76? > I've read the FAQ. But I76 seems to fall into the cracks of "arcadey > and action" and I tend to think the speed monsters that use r.a.s. > will not want to discuss it here. ("Carmageddon" for example would not > be an appropriate title to discuss, but I76 reportedly has car physics > that would seem to qualify it as a sim.) > I'm also a N2/ICR2-aholic, and I would like coverage of I76 *here* > without venturing into the jumbled mess that is c.s.i.p.g.action. > Nomex Underwear is on. Fire Away. > #83 LucasFilm THX Ford Thunderbird
Steve Croni 22 Mar 1997#360356
Made a mistake in this post replace the line "Trust me whether you are playing single player(in which you feel like your in the middle of a movie) or you are playing single player, NO GAME that I've played yet(N2, ICR2, GP2)(Duke3d,Quake) captures the e***ment of racing around in 1968-1976 muscle cars on beautiful, widespread levels(they arent really tracks because you can go anywhere you want. " with "Trust me whether you are playing single player(in which you feel like your in the middle of a movie) or you are playing MULTI-PLAYER, NO GAME that I've played yet(N2, ICR2, GP2)(Duke3d,Quake) captures the e***ment of racing around in 1968-1976 muscle cars on beautiful, widespread levels(they arent really tracks because you can go anywhere you want. " > As a beta tester I can testify to the realism of the physics of the cars. I > defy any of you to show me a sim in which it feels more like you are > driving a car and I have played them all. And if you want to remove weapons > and just race, trust me there are no better tracks than those in I76. > Mountains, bridges, towns, etc,etc,etc. are there to race THROUGH not just > to look at from a distance as in GP2, Nascar2, Icr2. As a matter of fact > one of the first single player missions pits you against your friend who > wants to test your driving prowess by racing you through a serpentine dirt > road, full of short cuts, wooden jumps etc, if he beats you you cannot go > any further in the game(i.e. you are not good enough), but if you beat him, > he directs you to follow a road(ex:route 88) for one mile and protect > something(yes, you have to follow your road map). Trust me whether you are > playing single player(in which you feel like your in the middle of a movie)
Quoted text (34 lines)> or you are playing single player, NO GAME that I've played yet(N2, ICR2, > GP2)(Duke3d,Quake) captures the e***ment of racing around in 1968-1976 > muscle cars on beautiful, widespread levels(they arent really tracks > because you can go anywhere you want. If you are driving on a one hundred > foot high cliff and want to fly off that cliff to your death (I dont know > why you would want to other than to witness it<it looks greatfrom the > different camera angles>) you can do it. You have no restrictions. > > I've been following the progress of this game for several months now > > and it has finally gone gold, we should see it on the shelves very > > soon. I have to confess I find the idea of an auto-combat action-sim > > very intriguing (ole' Car Wars fanatic.) and the buzz on this game is > > quite favorable. > > But my question is, will the users of r.a.s. support discussion of > > I76? > > I've read the FAQ. But I76 seems to fall into the cracks of "arcadey > > and action" and I tend to think the speed monsters that use r.a.s. > > will not want to discuss it here. ("Carmageddon" for example would not > > be an appropriate title to discuss, but I76 reportedly has car physics > > that would seem to qualify it as a sim.) > > I'm also a N2/ICR2-aholic, and I would like coverage of I76 *here* > > without venturing into the jumbled mess that is c.s.i.p.g.action. > > Nomex Underwear is on. Fire Away. > > #83 LucasFilm THX Ford Thunderbird

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy