Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Rockingham N2 Lap Times

10 posts by 9 people · 20 Feb 1997 - 27 Feb 1997

I.. 20 Feb 1997#356782
Out of curiosity, what has everyone been able to do at the Rock? I turned a 149.7 and thought that was fairly good until I looked at the record.....157 something, I think it says. Also, seems the AI cars are, as a whole, faster here than other places. Seems that the whole stinkin field can turn 149s. 147.4 or so is only good enough for 14th fastest in practice. (AI at 100%) Do I just suck here or is the AI that good? -Kev
Tom Hansen 20 Feb 1997#356783
This track is tough on setups - because the setup through turn one and two is very different from that for turn three and four. You tend to push out in one and two losing time off turn two and down the back straight. Also, "the Rock" is a tough place to pass. I found Dover lap times to be too high for the AI cars and did turn rels down one notch - this was particularly true when using the "AI patch" available from the pits. I find "the Rock" AI strength to be acceptable - but difficult. I can stay with the AI cars around the track - but I can't pass very much. At Dover with rels=103 (I think this was the normal), the AI cars would drive away and turn laps in excess of 156 consistently - very unrealistic by real WC standards. 150-152 is more typical. I don't think you suck here - it is just a tough track to setup for. I think your 14th place is ok. Run a race with these results and just try and stay with the pack. You will learn a lot from this and should be able to work on the setup better after a race. If you cannot stay with the AI cars - then you have some problems to work on immediately. /THansen
Kerry Grant 20 Feb 1997#356784
My fastest lap time at the rock was 150.092.
Quoted text (9 lines)> Out of curiosity, what has everyone been able to do at the Rock? > I turned a 149.7 and thought that was fairly good until I looked at > the record.....157 something, I think it says. Also, seems the AI cars > are, as a whole, faster here than other places. Seems that the whole > stinkin field can turn 149s. 147.4 or so is only good enough for 14th > fastest in practice. (AI at 100%) Do I just suck here or is the AI > that good? > -Kev
ccorpor 20 Feb 1997#356785
writes: REPLY: What I found with my fastest qualify setup I could not pass on the straight, I needed more r's coming out of the turn to pass on the straights. My actual race setup which is slower per lap is better against the AI. Now I can actually catch them down the straight, my best quailfying setup could only stay even. And once you get to the corner first then they'll adjust to you and you'll take the position. Q.B.M.
ccorpor 20 Feb 1997#356786
Quoted text (9 lines)> Out of curiosity, what has everyone been able to do at the Rock? > I turned a 149.7 and thought that was fairly good until I looked at > the record.....157 something, I think it says. Also, seems the AI cars > are, as a whole, faster here than other places. Seems that the whole > stinkin field can turn 149s. 147.4 or so is only good enough for 14th > fastest in practice. (AI at 100%) Do I just suck here or is the AI > that good? > -Kev
REPLY: I've hit 152 but usualy run a 150 during a race it's around 149. Q.B.M.
Drbob 21 Feb 1997#356912
I was where you are till I downloaded a setup off the net. The guy's initials were ph I think. Now I can do low 150s and run up front at 100%, but it's not easy. A key is to brake just a touch early and be full on the gas well before the apex. The actual record is well out of reach for me (or the AI at 100%). By the way, the same guys setup makes Michigan a boring win at 100%. bob
Pekka Hei 21 Feb 1997#356913
Thank you for your kind words Dr. Bob, much appreciated. Greetings, Pekka Heino _____________
Quoted text (15 lines)>>I was where you are till I downloaded a setup off the net. The guy's >>initials were ph I think. Now I can do low 150s and run up front at 100%, >>but it's not easy. A key is to brake just a touch early and be full on >>the gas well before the apex. The actual record is well out of reach for >>me (or the AI at 100%). By the way, the same guys setup makes Michigan a >>boring win at 100%. >> bob >Thank you for your kind words Dr. Bob, much appreciated. >Greetings, >Pekka Heino >_____________
Pekka's setup also helped me build one hell of a car for Talladega. Kyle Langston _________________________________ http://www.traction.git.net/nrcentral/
MCritche 22 Feb 1997#357043
Where are Pekka's setups posted? I need all the help I can get!
dalan 27 Feb 1997#357671
> It looks as though your setups have tooken off!!<G> Hehe..Hurry and > put back your system.. Let's go and Kali to test out things.. Hehe.. Are these setups the ones on www.ivga.com?? If not where are they? David/vetteracer

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy