Pentium Pro 200 mhz

I was just wondering how will a Pentium Pro 200mhz run under dos session with gp2, the video card is a STB ViRGE[TM]/VX 8mb of ram, also the system has 72MB of EDO DRAM

I should work, but if you have any problems, please send the hardware to me, I will be happy to fix it for you ;-) (Might take a little time though) Mose

Not Very well. The olny benifits you will recieve with Pentium Pros are in Windows NT. It will run 16 bit aplications like a Pentium. But it excels 32 bit apps. You find out all about it on there web sight. www.intel.com Chris

Quoted text (11 lines)

> Not Very well. The olny benifits you will recieve with Pentium Pros are in > Windows NT. It will run 16 bit aplications like a Pentium. But it excels > 32 bit apps. You find out all about it on there web sight. www.intel.com > > I was just wondering how will a Pentium Pro 200mhz run under dos session > > with gp2, the video card is a STB ViRGE[TM]/VX 8mb of ram, also the > system > > has 72MB of EDO DRAM

Hello Chris, Do you actually have such a system? It works great on mine! You will find that a PPRO200 (mine is o.c. to 233) with Fastvid and the appropriate video card (mine is Millenium) gives the best gp2 performance of any system available. GP2 is a 32-bit executable. It's developed under dos4gw. The fact that it uses DOS as a program-loader and for file-i/o is irrelevant to its real-time operation. This sounds to me like someone repeating the old news that only applied to the very earliest PPRO chip-sets. -- --------------- Scott Pritchett

www.intel.com I'm very pleased, that somebody else but me, agrees that PP doen' t run 16 bit programs (like all the shit we like) faster than a normal P. That's a statement.......... ;-) Mose

Quoted text (12 lines)

> > Not Very well. The olny benifits you will recieve with Pentium Pros are > in > > Windows NT. It will run 16 bit aplications like a Pentium. But it > excels > > 32 bit apps. You find out all about it on there web sight. > www.intel.com > I'm very pleased, that somebody else but me, agrees that PP doen' t run 16 > bit programs (like all the shit we like) faster than a normal P. That's a > statement.......... ;-) > Mose

I have an older P6/200. It uses the debugged Orion chip set, not quite as fast as the newer Natoma, and a single bank of fast page RAM, not quite as fast as having two or four banks. For GP2, I turn off the clouds, mirror details, and this thing screams on every track but Monaco, which slows it down a little. I might be able to adjust this, and get the mirror detail and clouds to work on different tracks, but I just leave those options and enjoy myself. I ran sum experiments on ICR2, and found that I was getting about 23 FPS with all of the cars visible, and all of the detail on at Michigan. On the road courses I prefer, where fewer cars are visible ahead and behind, the numbers were better. The P6 does fine on 16 bit applications. On 32 bit applications, like the DOS4GW based sims discussed in this group, the P6 is great. To my eyes, it looks "Like the movies", as far as being smooth. I don't remember the processor occupancy numbers, but I never notice a slow-down. How does it compare to a P5/166, P5/200 or P5/200/MMX? I've never seen one run GP2. I'm not saying the fast P5s are crap. I am saying any owner of a P6/200 will be happy with GP2 and ICR2. I hope P5 owners are happy to. I'll never expect to own one. Larry

Check this site http://www.zip.com.au/~davidg/GP2/data/poresult.html You'll realize that the difference between a P200 and a P200MMX (same video cards) is about 10% -- Beno?t "H.i." Parmentier lanceur de rayons en herbe, pilote du dimanche, ventuellement lve ingnieur http://www.mygale.org/06/parmenti

I have a P200mmx and I can run everything on except clouds in svga and I get 26+ frames. The PP200 is a waist of money just to run DOS games. The 200MMX is the better buy. It is half the price. Chris > > Not Very well. The olny benifits you will recieve with Pentium Pros are

Quoted text (7 lines)

> in > > Windows NT. It will run 16 bit aplications like a Pentium. But it > excels > > 32 bit apps. You find out all about it on there web sight. > www.intel.com > I'm very pleased, that somebody else but me, agrees that PP doen' t run

16 > bit programs (like all the shit we like) faster than a normal P. That's a > statement.......... ;-) > Mose I have an older P6/200. It uses the debugged Orion chip set, not quite as fast as the newer Natoma, and a single bank of fast page RAM, not quite as fast as having two or four banks. For GP2, I turn off the clouds, mirror details, and this thing screams on every track but Monaco, which slows it down a little. I might be able to adjust this, and get the mirror detail and clouds to work on different tracks, but I just leave those options and enjoy myself. I ran sum experiments on ICR2, and found that I was getting about 23 FPS with all of the cars visible, and all of the detail on at Michigan. On the road courses I prefer, where fewer cars are visible ahead and behind, the numbers were better. The P6 does fine on 16 bit applications. On 32 bit applications, like the DOS4GW based sims discussed in this group, the P6 is great. To my eyes, it looks "Like the movies", as far as being smooth. I don't remember the processor occupancy numbers, but I never notice a slow-down. How does it compare to a P5/166, P5/200 or P5/200/MMX? I've never seen one run GP2. I'm not saying the fast P5s are crap. I am saying any owner of a P6/200 will be happy with GP2 and ICR2. I hope P5 owners are happy to. I'll never expect to own one. Larry

>I have a P200mmx and I can run everything on except clouds in svga and I >get 26+ frames. The PP200 is a waist of money just to run DOS games. The >200MMX is the better buy. It is half the price. Are you sure about that? My PPro200 was hardly any more than a P200, and when the MMX came out, considerably LESS than the P200MMX - things may have changed that latter point, but I only got my PPro200 about 3 weeks ago, having ordered it a week and a bit before that. "Half the price"? That is in the UK mind you. It's difficult for me to compare the two as I have only the one, but everything I've tried is stunning AND it's great work my development work in NT4! Stuart -- Stuart Booth Somewhere in Oxfordshire, England, UK Note: My email address is in disguise! Remove trailing Z

Check on Dell, Their MMX 200mhz is way cheap. With all the best stuff you can have http://www.dell.com Why buy a Scrapard Bell or Aptiva?? Go for the power. Buy a Dell This is not a publicity It reflects the reality of today's computers Read magazines and you will find that Dell 200MMX is +/-30% cheaper then the PP200. And their the best computers on the market. No joke. Thanks a lot, Good race at the Brickyard, (Old'Indytrack guy) [===] Go Rubens Barrichello, Jacques Villeneuve, | ! | And all you that thinks that Jacques Villeneuve is |!| from Canada, your right!! He's from St-Jean sur le |o| Richelieu, 30 minutes from Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [--I--] v Fran?ois Mnard "Wasupe LeGrand" Nien Numb in the National Star Wars League(X-Wing vs Tie-Fighter league) http://www.dakotacom.net/~strange/ http://www.starwars.com/ Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition,N2,Gp2,Icr2.How can my life be better? May the force be with you, always!! Que la force soit avec toi, jamais!(for you French people) Excuse me for my poor English(I'm French speaking)