Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Nascar2 computer

19 posts by 12 people · 10 Dec 1996 - 16 Dec 1996

Phili 10 Dec 1996#347446
I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine. What do you find works the best with nascar2?
T. Fraustei 11 Dec 1996#347706
200 Pentium, 32 mg ram, 4 mg Rendition 3D video card, 17 inch monitor. At least that's what I want!
B Morph 11 Dec 1996#347707
A P133 with 32 meg ram and a Verite 3d board would make anybody happy. Q.B.M.
Bill Osborn 11 Dec 1996#347708
> I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine. > What do you find works the best with nascar2? A cray
I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2. It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard, Intergraph Reactor, Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD, NE2000 network card. Cost $3100 delivered. I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally awesome! My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a BIG difference between the two. Regards, ---Wayne. > > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine. > > What do you find works the best with nascar2? > A cray
Quoted text (28 lines)> I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2. > It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard, > Intergraph Reactor, > Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD, NE2000 > network card. > Cost $3100 delivered. > I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally > awesome! > My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a > BIG > difference between the two. > Regards, > ---Wayne. > > > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine. > > > What do you find works the best with nascar2? > > A cray
I am in the process of deciding on what buy for my next system, and am waiting for the MMX Pentiums. How does your PPro do in other app's? I am under the impression that that the MMX Pentiums will be better suited for what I will it for as the PPro's are not supposed to be real good with 16bit apps. Had any problems?? Mick in Tampa -- ______________________________________________________________________ | | | ____ ___ ___| | Mike Schreiner |CNSRL ADMIN. | ---\ / / /__ | |http://pages.prodigy.com/CNSRL | | --\ / /---/_ | | "Mick" on Hawaii |Earnhardt Rules!!| -\/ / / | | "Mick_S" on Ten | | / | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
DaMa 12 Dec 1996#347953
Your freakin backup machine is better than mine. Must be nice. DaMan
Quoted text (28 lines)>I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2. >It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard, >Intergraph Reactor, >Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD, NE2000 >network card. >Cost $3100 delivered. >I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally >awesome! >My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a >BIG >difference between the two. >Regards, > ---Wayne. >> > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine. >> > What do you find works the best with nascar2? >> A cray
>>I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ >machine. >>What do you find works the best with nascar2? >A P133 with 32 meg ram and a Verite 3d board would make anybody happy. I might up that to a P166 (to make *everybody* happy), but I'm pretty happy with one month old PC with the same config as you mentioned (not to say it may not get a CPU upgrade in a year or so, but right now the 133 was a lot of HP for few $$$ ;). PS - B. Morphin, sounds like a way cool setup you've got. What part of the country do you live in -- any chance you need a new friend to stop by and play sometime? :) Pick one or more: Model Rockets (competition-NERCB) / PCs (even Atari!) / Papyrus ICR-ICR2-NCR / Who needs a life when you have multiple non-lives?
Eric Busch 12 Dec 1996#347955
Perhaps, but most games are 32-bit. On the PPros, Win95 runs slower than NT because it is a mix of 16-bit and 32-bit code. -- Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Greg Cisko 12 Dec 1996#347956
Just one question. Have you actually tried this? Or are you relying on old PPro hype.
Quoted text (14 lines)> -- > Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences > The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative > Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/ > > I am under the impression that that the MMX Pentiums will be better > > suited for what I will it for as the PPro's are not supposed to be > real > > good with 16bit apps. Had any problems??
The *ONLY* reason MMX P5's *MIGHT* make a difference is because the chips have a 64K internal cache. BTW, A poorly written P5 MMX application will stall in a similar manner to the way the old PPro did with 16-bit apps. So there :-)
I would not have got this setup if not for Nascar and the new NRO. Since there is going to be real competition I think that demands a premium configuration. I had to really push myself to spend the money but you can't take it with you so what the heck. Regards, ---Wayne.
Quoted text (9 lines)> Your freakin backup machine is better than mine. Must be nice. > DaMan > >I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2. > >It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard, > >Intergraph Reactor, > >Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD,
NE2000 > >network card. > >Cost $3100 delivered. > >I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally > >awesome! > >My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a
Quoted text (12 lines)> >BIG > >difference between the two. > >Regards, > > ---Wayne. > >> > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ
machine. > >> > What do you find works the best with nascar2? > >> A cray
Eric Busch 12 Dec 1996#347958
Yes I've seen a PPro duel boot to NT and 95, and it was slower in the 95 sessions. There have been plenty of benchmarks done by computer magazines that quantify what I saw. there :-) There's also a few other enhancements over the current Pentiums: (Taken from Tom's Hardware and Performance Guide: http://sysdoc.pair.com/cpu.html) ?doubling of the L1 caches, 16kB data and 16 kB instruction cache ?doubling of the Write Buffers, now 4 instead of 2 ?new branch prediction unit, taken from the Pentium Pro ?implementation of a Return Stack, as known from the Cyrix/IBM 6x86 ?increase of the Pipelines by one step ?improvement of the Parallel Processing Ability of the two pipelines ?ability to pair up two MMX instructions in one go, hence 2 SIMD instructions can be processed with 16 byte data in one clock cycle Early reports with normal (non-MMX) applications that the MMX CPU's are about 20% faster than a Pentium Classic of the same clock speed. -- Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
Mick, I have heard some good things and bad things about the MMX so I decided I could not wait. THe way I figure it the Pro should last me until end of next year and then I will get whatever the new standard is then. This machine runs everything fast. It is the quickest computer I have ever used. It seems to make the most difference with NT as that is all 32bit but WIN95 has quite a bit of 32bit in the OS and it really screams. Regards, ---Wayne.
Eric Busch 12 Dec 1996#347961
That's partially my point as well. After you throw in the larger improvement with MMX-enabled applications (24-bit color at 8-bit speeds for example), it really looks to be a good upgrade: for not much more money, it's quite a better CPU. I can't understand why anyone would buy a Pentium Classic right now. -- Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/
John Lyn 12 Dec 1996#347962
Quoted text (7 lines)>> Just one question. Have you actually tried this? Or are you relying >on old >> PPro hype. >Yes I've seen a PPro duel boot to NT and 95, and it was slower in the >95 sessions. There have been plenty of benchmarks done by computer >magazines that quantify what I saw.
I run the exact same machine at home and at work (HP PPro 200, Matrox, 64MB). The one at home runs 95, the one at work NT 4.0. NT is noticeably faster in everything from screen updates to CPU and disk-intensive activities like compiling code. I only use 95 at home because I've got a bunch of MIDI software that really doesn't like NT, and because the company I work for ships software for both platforms. John
B Morph 13 Dec 1996#348197
>That's partially my point as well. After you throw in the larger >improvement with MMX-enabled applications (24-bit color at 8-bit speeds >for example), it really looks to be a good upgrade: for not much more >money, it's quite a better CPU. I can't understand why anyone would >buy a Pentium Classic right now. REPLY: There's a sound issue that in the MMX which almst eveybody never mentions. From what Epic has stated there will be a very big a noticeable advancment in the quality of sound. Just something else to ponder. Q.B.M.
And 16 Dec 1996#348852
I just got done putting mine together and it works well... Pentium 200 / 512 Cache / Intel VX PCI bus / 32Mb RAM Adaptec 2940 PCI SCSI controller with a 2Gb Baracuda drive Intergraph Reactor PCI video card Thrustmaster T2 wheel 100W stereo speakers attached to a 16 bit sound card and... my helmet :) Can't forget that... LOL -Andy

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy