Folks,
I just upgraded from an Pentium 60 to an Cyrix processor, got a good deal as the board and Cyrix chip were
only $295.
E***d as I was to get home and try out the new stuff on the demo of Nascar 2, but only to find out that
the Cyrix chips will not run the demo.
Is this just a bug in the demo version?
This will be fixed when the full version is released RIGHT?
Anybody with any help, comments or suggestions please E-mail me promptly, as there is no since taking up
bandwidth on this subject.
Thanks guys
Mike
If they want your business they will fix it, unless they are paid off by
Intel.
Proud Cyrix owner.
Quoted text (18 lines)
> Folks, > I just upgraded from an Pentium 60 to an Cyrix processor, got a good deal as the board and Cyrix chip were > only $295. > E***d as I was to get home and try out the new stuff on the demo of Nascar 2, but only to find out that > the Cyrix chips will not run the demo. > Is this just a bug in the demo version? > This will be fixed when the full version is released RIGHT? > Anybody with any help, comments or suggestions please E-mail me promptly, as there is no since taking up > bandwidth on this subject. > Thanks guys > Mike>If they want your business they will fix it, unless they are paid off by
>Intel.
Adam L. from Papyrus posted a message stating that the Cyrix problem was
fixed. Seems like it was just a couple of days after the Nascar2 demo was
released. He also stated that they were not going fix the demo and
re-release it, as it is only a demo. Let them finish the full version which,
by the way, WILL run on the Cyrix.
Bye,
Mike Radler
Speaking of Adam, anyone see/heard from Papyrus lately? Mighty
quiet......... Chained in front of Nascar2 code maybe?
Robert
writes:
which,
>by the way, WILL run on the Cyrix.
>Bye,
>Mike Radler
If I wanted Cyrix owners business I would most definitely release the
updated version.
Something smells.
Quoted text (7 lines)
>>If they want your business they will fix it, unless they are paid off by >>Intel. >Adam L. from Papyrus posted a message stating that the Cyrix problem was >fixed. Seems like it was just a couple of days after the Nascar2 demo was >released. He also stated that they were not going fix the demo and >re-release it, as it is only a demo. Let them finish the full versionQuoted text (15 lines)
>writes: >>>If they want your business they will fix it, unless they are paid off by >>>Intel. >>Adam L. from Papyrus posted a message stating that the Cyrix problem was >>fixed. Seems like it was just a couple of days after the Nascar2 demo was >>released. He also stated that they were not going fix the demo and >>re-release it, as it is only a demo. Let them finish the full version >>which, by the way, WILL run on the Cyrix. > If I wanted Cyrix owners business I would most definitely release the >updated version. Something smells.Quoted text (9 lines)
>>Adam L. from Papyrus posted a message stating that the Cyrix problem was >>fixed. Seems like it was just a couple of days after the Nascar2 demo was >>released. He also stated that they were not going fix the demo and >>re-release it, as it is only a demo. Let them finish the full version >>which, by the way, WILL run on the Cyrix. > If I wanted Cyrix owners business I would most definitely release the >updated version. >Something smells.Quoted text (7 lines)
>... snip ... >Ok so we all know you're a programmer now. What masterpiece did you >come up with? This has nothing to do with my-your brain. If they had >released Nas2 and it only ran on Powerpc's, wouldn't you think Apple >had something to do with it? Or can you see that far in your superior >programmers mind?Simmons) writes:
>Subject: Re: Cyrix P166 Chips and Nascar 2
>Date: Wed, 06 Nov 96 15:07:05 GMT
(SBeshear)
Radler)
>>writes:
>>>>If they want your business they will fix it, unless they are paid off by
>>>>Intel.
>>>Adam L. from Papyrus posted a message stating that the Cyrix problem was
>>>fixed. Seems like it was just a couple of days after the Nascar2 demo was
just to
>fill that void in your skull, it wouldn't be rotting and you'd realize that
>it's worth far more to Papy to finish the real sim than to cater to some
>idiot
>alarmist who thinks everybody's out to get him.
>Leave Papy alone and let them finish the sim itself (I don't have much faith
>in their November delivery date, but that's because I'm a programmer and I
>understand that shit happens to postpone a scheduled release). Then, if you
>feel so inclined, you can download the new demo they promised and make up
>your
>mind then. The demo that is currently available isn't much of a demo IMHO,
>and not worth the 8mb download. Lots of stuff doesn't work (even on the
>Pentiums), and it's a well known fact that it doesn't work on Cyrix chips or
Ok so we all know you're a programmer now. What masterpiece did you come
up with? This has nothing to do with my-your brain. If they had released
Nas2 and
it only ran on Powerpc's, wouldn't you think Apple had something to do
with it?
Or can you see that far in your superior programmers mind?
Quoted text (8 lines)
>>>released. He also stated that they were not going fix the demo and >>>re-release it, as it is only a demo. Let them finish the full version >>>which, by the way, WILL run on the Cyrix. >> If I wanted Cyrix owners business I would most definitely release the >>updated version. Something smells. >What "smells" is your brain. If you'd use it for something more thanQuoted text (7 lines)
>in machines with less than 16mb of RAM. Not only that, but it dcoesn't >showcase the enhancements for the Verite chipset. >/===================================================\ >| John Simmons (Redneck Techno-Biker) | >| http://www2.connectnet.com/users/jms/index.html |Quoted text (11 lines)
>writes: >Adam L. from Papyrus posted a message stating that the Cyrix problem was >>fixed. Seems like it was just a couple of days after the Nascar2 demo was >>released. He also stated that they were not going fix the demo and >>re-release it, as it is only a demo. Let them finish the full version >which, >>by the way, WILL run on the Cyrix. >>Bye, >>Mike RadlerSo I got my Reactor on Friday, hurried home and slapped it
into my 686 200+. On Win95 startup, it tried to load the
Microsoft Rendition drivers rather than look at the disk
I had, but after a little bumbling around I got it straight.
So, the scoop on Papyrus Sims...
As has been said, ICR2 will not run in DMA mode. *BUT* this is
*not* a Cyrix problem, nor is it a ICR2 problem. According to
Sierra, indyfast runs just fine on their Rendition card (go
figure), even in Cyrix machines. Anyway, after going back and
forth between the companies, Steve at Intergraph told me that
they already had a TR (trouble report or some such) open for
this problem and their developers were working on it as we
speak. The symptoms are a bunch of garbage colors or a white
line at the top of the screen, followed by an "Illegal Opcode"
register dump. For anyone who's interested, the TR # is
289602743.
Apparently, a fix for some Cyrix machines is as simple as
commenting out the 'RR' line in 'indyfast.bat'. If you have
a Cyrix and ICR2 isn't working, might want to give that a
try. Didn't help me though.
FWIW, IndySafe looks spectacular. It does bog down a bit in
traffic, and I can't stand knowing that it could be better,
but its night and day better than my old original ICR.
Jason Perkins


































