Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

3D Card Update by Loyd Case

1 post by 1 person · 13 Sep 1996 - 13 Sep 1996

Eric Busch 13 Sep 1996#336933
Loyd Case of CGW: "Okay, here's some of my preliminary findings for this month's round of graphics cards. I've been running a lot of tests for the CGW graphics card roundup. While I know everyone wants numbers, I'm gonna wait until I finish the second half (the article's going to be a two parter, running in the November and December issues). The cards I tested in this batch were (chipset in parentheses): STB Lightspeed 128 (ET6000) Best Windows performance of the ET6k cards. Slightly slower (but only a very little) in DOS than the Herc. Nice software bundle, if you're into that (Earthsiege 2, Silent Thunder, first ten missions of Terra Nova). Hercules Dynamite 128/V (ET6000) Slowest Windows performance of the ET6k cards, best DOS performance. Same Hercules utilities & support. Videologic Grafixstar 600 (ET6000) Slowest in DOS of the ET6k cards. Duke Nukem 3D performance was a good 5 fps slower (35 vs 40). Also, Quake took on a decided greenish cast running in VESA mode, which Scitech's Display Doctor cleared up. Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 - 4 MB version (S3 ViRGE) This was the smoothest implementation of the ViRGE I've seen. Good Windows and DOS performance. The DOS performance was better than past S3 cards, but not on a par with the ET6000. Direct3D testing showed it to be the fastest in 3D of the ViRGE cards tested by a few percentage points. Hercules Terminator 3D - 4 MB version This will be the least expensive of the 4 MB cards (let's just say WELL under $200 for a 4 MB card...) Its 3D performance lagged the Stealth's a bit, as did the DOS performance, by just a bit. Number Nine Reality/332fx This was something of a disappointment. It was the slowest of the ViRGE cards in Direct3D testing, middling average in DOS. Most expensive of the three ($199 for 2 MB). There is no 4 MB version. Matrox Mystique Also something of a disappointment, but more because I had high expectations after the Millenium. The Mystique lacks some key features, such as bilinear filtering, alpha blending for transparency and fog effects. It had the fastest Windows performance of all the cards I tested (no surprise there), but the Direct3D testing was mixed. It can move pixels REALLY fast, but this didn't translate into fast polygon rendering. The Mystique version of Mechwarrior 2 runs at 640x400 in Windows 95, looks better than the stock version, but looks much less pretty than the ATI version. DOS performance was good, too, maybe a bit better than the Millenium. It's around $269 for 4 MB. ATI 3D Xpression PC2TV All right, let's all lug our PC's into the family room and hook 'em up to the big screen TV. The new ATI card, using the Rage/2 chip, has built-in NTSC capability. I don't know if you can have it connected to a computer monitor and an NTSC display simultaneously, but if it can, the folks doing Falcon 4 should check it out. Or maybe you guys who brag about your Warbird antics can videotape them now... As for performance, DOS performance was mediocre--not bad, mind you, but we expect more these days. DOS VGA was pretty slow, SVGA somewhat better. Windows performance was pretty good, and Direct3D performance on a par with the Mystique and the S3 cards--not great, but not as horrible as everyone's been painting them, either. Mechwarrior 2, although only running at 512x384, looks terrific. Polygon count of moving objects have increased, all textures are filtered (and there are ground and sky textures) and the color map animation in the sky looks great. Diamond Monster 3D and Orchid Righteous 3D These cards uses the 3Dfx chipset, and is an add-on board, requiring a second PCI slot and a VGA pass-through cable (supplied). I've only tested it with the Lightspeed 128 so far (that's not an endor***t of the STB card necessarily; it was the one I had in at the time when I tested the 3Dfx boards). The 3D image quality on both 3Dfx boards is stunning. The Diamond board is a tad slower than the Orchid board, and the Orchid utilities are a bit nicer. Other than that, both boards blew away the Direct3D tests. The 3D performance margin was easily 3-4 times that of the other boards, with more features to turn on, on the benchmarks. I had one Direct3D game, Hellbender. The Diamond card never dipped below 25 fps on Hellbender, and the Orchid card maintained 29-30 fps. The multipurpose 3D cards (S3, ATI, Mystique) ran Hellbender at frame rates ranging from 4 - 19 fps depending upon how furious the action. Pricing will be a bit under $300, and software bundles aren't yet final, but both boards will be shipping fairly soon. That's it for this month. Next month, I'll look at the 3D Blaster, a PowerVR card, maybe a Permedia card or two, the high-end ATI card, a couple of ViRGE/VX parts and possibly a Number Nine Imagine/128 series 2. As ever, Loyd Case" -- Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy