Could you send your laptimes done with a joystick as a followup to
this message! I'd like to compare my efforts with yours, and I'd like to
know how fast I can go! (I haven't found a HOF with control method
mentioned!).
Joonas
So far I have managed the following times using a m'soft sidewinder
Pacific gp - 1.13.822
Imola gp - 1.23.742
Monaco gp - 1.22.050
Barcelona gp - 1.26.593
Montreal gp - 1.24.019
These were all in practise any circuit and not race conditions. I have
had the game 2 weeks now and am still learning. Good luck
--
> Could you send your laptimes done with a joystick as a followup to
>this message! I'd like to compare my efforts with yours, and I'd like to
>know how fast I can go! (I haven't found a HOF with control method
>mentioned!).
> Joonas
Hi,
Interlagos: 1.14.980 with Gravis Analog Pro and no steering help;
manual shifting.
Bye
Sven
mid 1:26 at monza with no steering help. I need alot more practice.
Quoted text (17 lines)
>> Could you send your laptimes done with a joystick as a followup to >> this message! I'd like to compare my efforts with yours, and I'd like to >> know how fast I can go! (I haven't found a HOF with control method >> mentioned!). >> Joonas >So far I have managed the following times using a m'soft sidewinder >Pacific gp - 1.13.822 >Imola gp - 1.23.742 >Monaco gp - 1.22.050 >Barcelona gp - 1.26.593 >Montreal gp - 1.24.019 >These were all in practise any circuit and not race conditions. I have >had the game 2 weeks now and am still learning. Good luckQuoted text (7 lines)
>> Could you send your laptimes done with a joystick as a followup to >> this message! I'd like to compare my efforts with yours, and I'd like to >> know how fast I can go! (I haven't found a HOF with control method >> mentioned!). >> Joonas >mid 1:26 at monza with no steering help. I need alot more practice.Personally I run with a wheel, but Achim Trensz over on CompuServe is
the hottest joystick runner I've seen. A 1:19.7 at Imola, and a 1:14.4xx
at Interlagos (yes, really!) are his latest gems. Pretty impressive, and
that's without steering help...
Cheers!
John
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
> > Could you send your laptimes done with a joystick as a
> mid 1:26 at monza with no steering help. I need alot more practice.
I found up that the setup of your car, more than practice alone, is
what really matters (of course I might be wrong but this is my
impression).
I use no help whatsoever and a joystick, and was around 1:30 in Monza.
I then started to change the advanced (1) set up and I immediately
managed 1:27. Touching the packers (advanced setup 2) I went down
to high 1:25 in my 2nd lap out of the pits with the new setup ...
now I need to optimize those packers and to understand what all the
others advanced options do, the manual is not great help I think ;)
Bye,
Luca
Quoted text (9 lines)
> >Pacific 1.10.8xx > >Monaco 1.21.043 > >Monza 1.23.2xx > >Imola 1.23.xxx > Personally I run with a wheel, but Achim Trensz over on CompuServe is > the hottest joystick runner I've seen. A 1:19.7 at Imola, and a 1:14.4xx > at Interlagos (yes, really!) are his latest gems. Pretty impressive, and > that's without steering help...These lap times were all set with a CH Flighstick Pro joystick and no
help options at all.
Interlagos 1m17.260
Aida 1m11.807
Imola 1m23.649
Monaco 1m20.001
Montreal 1m23.547
Hockenheim 1m45.070
Monza 1m24.4??
Estoril 1m21.682
Adelaide 1m15.289
As for Achim Trensz`s 1m14.4 at Interlagos, I think I`ll just crawl
into a corner and cry ;-)
Mark
_________________________________
"..every lap I think `Oh bollocks!
This is dreadful..`" Damon Hill
__________________________________
>As for Achim Trensz`s 1m14.4 at Interlagos, I think I`ll just crawl
>into a corner and cry ;-)
Join the club!
BTW, he's down to a 1:14.080 now......
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted text (16 lines)
> >So far I have managed the following times using a m'soft sidewinder > >Pacific gp - 1.13.822 > >Imola gp - 1.23.742 > >Monaco gp - 1.22.050 > >Barcelona gp - 1.26.593 > >Montreal gp - 1.24.019 > >These were all in practise any circuit and not race conditions. I > >have had the game 2 weeks now and am still learning. Good luck > I've managed: > Pacific 1.10.8xx > Monaco 1.21.043 > Monza 1.23.2xx > Imola 1.23.xxx > This is with a Gravis Analog Pro, with all driving aids off, > no steering help, but opposite lock help enabled.Hi Drusilla,
Sorry to disappoint you, but it's not true in GP2 - a human driver
always gets a car that performs like a Williams, regardless of whether
it is called a Williams, Ferrari or Minardi.
Cheers,
Richard
I personnaly think that the car you drive have always Williams performance
but other cars are more prone to mechanical problems.
I was using a Williams a first and almost never got mechanical failure. I
switched to a Simtek now I get loads of mechanical failure (transmission,
brake problems, oil leak,...).
If the performance are better with a Williams I should get much better
than my actual times in practice:
Monza : 1:21:221
Montreal: 1:20.215
Monaco : 1:16.982
I tried back with the Williams, with comparable time...
I use wheel+pedal and no aids or driving help.
Claude
Quoted text (23 lines)
> > >So far I have managed the following times using a m'soft sidewinder > > >Pacific gp - 1.13.822 > > >Imola gp - 1.23.742 > > >Monaco gp - 1.22.050 > > >Barcelona gp - 1.26.593 > > >Montreal gp - 1.24.019 > > >These were all in practise any circuit and not race conditions. I > > >have had the game 2 weeks now and am still learning. Good luck > > I've managed: > > Pacific 1.10.8xx > > Monaco 1.21.043 > > Monza 1.23.2xx > > Imola 1.23.xxx > > This is with a Gravis Analog Pro, with all driving aids off, > > no steering help, but opposite lock help enabled. > Well these times may be great and all that but it doesn't > really say much because the car you drive makes a big difference. > A Williams is definitely faster than a Minardi - you don't have to > be a rocket scientist to see that in real life, but it's also true > in GP2.Quoted text (11 lines)
> Hi Drusilla, > >Well these times may be great and all that but it doesn't > >really say much because the car you drive makes a big difference. > >A Williams is definitely faster than a Minardi - you don't have to > >be a rocket scientist to see that in real life, but it's also true > >in GP2. > Sorry to disappoint you, but it's not true in GP2 - a human driver > always gets a car that performs like a Williams, regardless of whether > it is called a Williams, Ferrari or Minardi.ccmailbr.mitel.com> writes
It's just your luck.
I've driven a Pacific in hundreds of practice and hotlap sessions, and
probably 10-20 full races and I've NEVER had a failure of any kind :(
They're all switched on, but my car would make Frank Williams jealous!
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
I have been practising on Barcelona a lot and have gotten down to
the 1:23's with all aids off, what kind of times are other
people getting, I haven't had the game too long so Barcelona is
the only track I have a good setup for.
> I have been practising on Barcelona a lot and have gotten down to
> the 1:23's with all aids off, what kind of times are other
> people getting, I haven't had the game too long so Barcelona is
> the only track I have a good setup for.
Become a member and show your stuff.
http:///www.ivga.com


































