Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

GP2: The trick to get good framerate!!!

4 posts by 4 people · 22 Jul 1996 - 27 Jul 1996

Okay, I committed this day to get the best possible frame rate out of GP2. Here's what I found. First, my current setup is Gateway-2000 P133, 32 MB RAM, Matrox Millenium with 4 MB WRAM. Previously I was running on SVGA with most details off, most textures off, with a target fps of 19.6, and with a projected fps of 19.6 (processor occupancy was pretty much 100% at this point). However, here's the trick I found to work all the time: ALWAYS SET YOUR TARGET FPS AT LEAST 2.0 LOWER THAN THE PROJECTED FPS!!! For guidance, here are my current settings: For VGA mode ------------ Every texture on, except sky. Every mirror object on, mirror textures are on. Object setting set to all ("Alles" on my GP2 ;). Target frame rate: 17.0 fps Projected fps : 19.6 fps Processor occupancies: Hockenheim - 80-90% at most! Monaco - 100-110% at most! For SVGA mode ------------- Every texture on, except sky and hills. Every mirror objects are on except fences. Mirror textures are off. Object setting set to all. Target frame rate: 15.0 fps Projected fps : 17.0 fps Processor occupancies: Hockenheim - 90-110% (sometimes 120% peak) Monaco - 160-220% (brrr!) The main point is, with these settings, my previous problems are gone! Namely, when smoke comes up or when there is an accident, the machine doesn't slow down to a crawl any more as it did before. SVGA mode is pretty playable now, even though the frame rate is probably not a lot more than 15.0 fps, but hey, there are a hell lot more objects around the track now than before! :) Obviously, I will have to adjust the SVGA settings for Monaco. VGA is now excellent and very much playable. (Did anybody notice that the VGA and the SVGA settings are saved separately, so when I switch between them, I don't have to re-click all the buttons again!? :-) Anyway, the point is: set your target fps to 2.0 lower than the projected (or calculated) fps, and you'll be fine! It certainly helped me! Any comments, suggestions, send a personal email to me. Thanx! _____________________________________________________________________________ LaLa (Imre Olajos, Jr.) _/ean /\/\ichel _/arre and -=\/=- angelis fan WWW : http://homepage.interaccess.com/~lala | | ~~ []/\() ~~~~~~~~~~~ "Music should be free." /Vangelis/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Julian Lov 23 Jul 1996#328221
> Anyway, the point is: set your target fps to 2.0 lower than the projected (or > calculated) fps, and you'll be fine! It certainly helped me! Thanks for this - I hadn't realised how the gfx optiones worked properly until this. Now SVGA is playable on my P133 with most textures on - before I had to turn most off! Cheers! Julian _____________________________________________________________________ University of Oxford
I'm using Zappa P90 o/c'd to 120, 24 MB RAM, Diamond Stealth SE (32-bit card, unlike Stealth 64), 1 MB DRAM. I was thinking about upgrading my graphics card, but the difference to Matrox 4 MB WRAM seems to be very small. Has anyone actually tried GP2 with two different graphics cards on a same system ? Is there a real difference (John Wallace's ratings showed a 10 fps difference between Matrox and Diamond Stealth 64, but the test was probably done with some benchmarking program, not a real game). I'm dropping the FPS usually three clicks worth. Experiment until your p.o. goes below 100 %. The same settings, I get projected 18.2 fps, and use target 16.0. P.o's about the same. Same settings (except fences are on in mirrors) give projected 14.2 fps . Must drop target down to 11.1 to get good occupancies. That's a nice feature, but I'd have liked to see frames adjustable on each track separately. I wrote a small utility to query and copy different global setups to the f1gpstate.sav file when starting the game. That way, I can have the right control settings, steering lock and graphics options loaded at the start and go straight to the quick race from the main menu. That's right. The frame settings AI needs a fix :) -- /sami
Martin Wats 27 Jul 1996#329554
Agreed. I have discovered this too. The estimated frame rate is too optimistic, and the game slows horribly if you use it. Selecting a lower rate gives you less frames, but you don`t really notice it, and the game speeds up. Martin

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy