Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

OT: Built me a new machine

9 posts by 4 people · 15 Sep 2004 21:06 UTC - 17 Sep 2004 12:23 UTC

Larry 15 Sep 2004 21:06 UTC#32046
The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also upgraded to 1GB of RAM. Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second in NR2003! That was a pleasant suprise :) I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) -Larry
Mitch_A 15 Sep 2004 21:29 UTC↳ reply to Larry#32048
I always said something was screwy with that box Larry. I get around 100FPS consistently on my P4-3gig/9700P. 1024X768X32 6XAA 16AF. Mitch "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04...
Quoted text (15 lines)> The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a > low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main > machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. > > Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also upgraded > to 1GB of RAM. > > Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second > in NR2003! > > That was a pleasant suprise :) > > I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) > > -Larry
Will_H#24 16 Sep 2004 00:13 UTC↳ reply to Larry#32055
How does the 64 bit chip work with NR 2003? "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04... The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also upgraded to 1GB of RAM. Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second in NR2003! That was a pleasant suprise :) I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) -Larry
What type of FPS are you getting now? Resolution settings etc.. Bill Bollinger www.gsxn.com "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04...
Quoted text (15 lines)> The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a > low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main > machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. > > Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also upgraded > to 1GB of RAM. > > Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second > in NR2003! > > That was a pleasant suprise :) > > I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) > > -Larry
Larry 16 Sep 2004 14:08 UTC↳ reply to Will_H#24#31944
No problems whatsoever. I have NOT installed XP SP2. I need to make sure it doesn't affect NR2003 (it's on the affected apps list for some reason). -Larry Will_H#24 wrote:
Quoted text (22 lines)> How does the 64 bit chip work with NR 2003? > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04... > The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a > low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my > main machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. > > Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also > upgraded to 1GB of RAM. > > Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per > second in NR2003! > > That was a pleasant suprise :) > > I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) > > -Larry > >
Larry 16 Sep 2004 14:17 UTC↳ reply to Mitch_A#31946
Nothing wrong with the old board at all, other than it was a 2.53Ghz machine. Before the upgrade, with typical settings in the game and Drivers @ 1280X1024X32, I got around 100 fps in Richmond. After the upgrade I got close to 160fps at Richmond. So I went into the game and the drivers and turned everything available at it's maximum quality settings and still stayed above 50-70fps, closer to 80 in area's. 1280X1024X32, 6xAA, 16xAF, all settings to quality and all settings maxed in game. Life is good :) -Larry Mitch_A wrote:
Quoted text (27 lines)> I always said something was screwy with that box Larry. I get around 100FPS > consistently on my P4-3gig/9700P. 1024X768X32 6XAA 16AF. > > Mitch > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04... > >>The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a >>low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main >>machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. >> >>Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also upgraded >>to 1GB of RAM. >> >>Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second >>in NR2003! >> >>That was a pleasant suprise :) >> >>I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) >> >>-Larry > > >
With 'typical' settings at Richmond at 1280X1024X32 I was getting 150-160. After maxing out the Game and driver, as well as upping the res to 1600X1200X32 I was getting 50-60, sometimes 70 or 80 depending on where the car was on the track and who was around me. I didn't get 'sitting in pits' measurements. I should have... -Larry Bill Bollinger wrote:
Quoted text (27 lines)> What type of FPS are you getting now? Resolution settings etc.. > > Bill Bollinger > www.gsxn.com > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04... > >>The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a >>low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main >>machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. >> >>Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also upgraded >>to 1GB of RAM. >> >>Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second >>in NR2003! >> >>That was a pleasant suprise :) >> >>I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) >> >>-Larry > > >
What driver version are you using? I am on the latest WDM and only get about 80 FPS. I am using a FX-53 chip with 1 gig of memory and a 9800 PRO ATI. In BF1942 I will get 200FPS but I guess NR2003 (For me) isn't up to snuff. Bill Bollinger www.gsxn.com "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Nsh2d.300006$Oi.255432@fed1read04...
Quoted text (37 lines)> With 'typical' settings at Richmond at 1280X1024X32 I was getting 150-160. > > After maxing out the Game and driver, as well as upping the res to > 1600X1200X32 I was getting 50-60, sometimes 70 or 80 depending on where > the car was on the track and who was around me. > > I didn't get 'sitting in pits' measurements. I should have... > > -Larry > > Bill Bollinger wrote: >> What type of FPS are you getting now? Resolution settings etc.. >> >> Bill Bollinger >> www.gsxn.com >> >> >> "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04... >> >>>The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a >>>low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main >>>machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. >>> >>>Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also >>>upgraded to 1GB of RAM. >>> >>>Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second >>>in NR2003! >>> >>>That was a pleasant suprise :) >>> >>>I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) >>> >>>-Larry >> >>
The new 4.9's. -Larry Bill Bollinger wrote:
Quoted text (52 lines)> What driver version are you using? I am on the latest WDM and only get > about 80 FPS. I am using a FX-53 chip with 1 gig of memory and a 9800 PRO > ATI. In BF1942 I will get 200FPS but I guess NR2003 (For me) isn't up to > snuff. > > Bill Bollinger > www.gsxn.com > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Nsh2d.300006$Oi.255432@fed1read04... > >>With 'typical' settings at Richmond at 1280X1024X32 I was getting 150-160. >> >>After maxing out the Game and driver, as well as upping the res to >>1600X1200X32 I was getting 50-60, sometimes 70 or 80 depending on where >>the car was on the track and who was around me. >> >>I didn't get 'sitting in pits' measurements. I should have... >> >>-Larry >> >>Bill Bollinger wrote: >> >>>What type of FPS are you getting now? Resolution settings etc.. >>> >>>Bill Bollinger >>>www.gsxn.com >>> >>> >>>"Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>news:v922d.299853$Oi.25345@fed1read04... >>> >>> >>>>The motherboard in my HTPC went bad, so instead of putting money into a >>>>low end system, I moved the current P4 2.53 and mother board from my main >>>>machine in there, and bought new guts for my main machine. >>>> >>>>Used an ASUS A8V motherboard and Athlon64 3500 processor. I also >>>>upgraded to 1GB of RAM. >>>> >>>>Using the same Radeon 9800 Pro, I picked up nearly _50_ frames per second >>>>in NR2003! >>>> >>>>That was a pleasant suprise :) >>>> >>>>I guess the Radeon had room for desert :) >>>> >>>>-Larry >>> >>> >

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy