Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Daytona - A Quick Update.

2 posts by 2 people · 29 May 1996 - 29 May 1996

Je 29 May 1996#320331
Hi All, No much has happened recently. I've e-mailed Andrew Gurtis at Daytona and haven't had a response yet so I'm not sure what the position is. I've read most of your thoughts/comments on the subject of the licensing and I think its becoming clear to you all what a minefield this is becoming. Sadly, I don't have the resources to defend/fight the battle for the Daytona track so its looks like its not going to come back. Even if I did win the fight, I doubt it would be worth it. After all the Daytona Patch was a hash job, its not that good - honest! :-) All of you of been very supportive and I thank you for that, but while I have the chance I'd just like to say a big 'Get lost' to the idiots who have been e-mailing me saying that The Pits are, and I quote: " A bunch of pussies" I'm sorry but, I don't want to be a hero. Its sensible men in wars who keep their heads down when bullets start flying. Now to address another question I've been getting asked a lot lately. No I am not releasing a track editor or any information on how to do it. Firstly, I don't use a track editor, just a hex editor and a pen and paper and we're a long way off a track editor similar to DEU for Doom. Also, lets take a short trip back in time (cue wobble vision)... Remember when everyone was asking Rick Genter why they wouldn't release a track editor? Well if you remember it was because the programs used we're very complicated and they didn't want/couldn't support them. Now, Payrus/Sierra/Whatever is a fairly big company and if they can't support programs like this, what chance have I got? The last thing I need is a 1000 e-mails a day asking why peoples tracks don't work! :-) There is also a m***reason. There are many Internet and Compuserve leauges that rely on either checksum checking software or honesty. Now imagine if people could easily alter tracks/AI to their advantage. No one could reliably police the series and they would collapse. Also, there is the risk of the Internet becoming flooded with poorly made tracks or hundred that are in breach of copyright. This may sound crazy, but we don't disclose information for these reasons. For that reason, we only release programs that are useful, needed and we make them available to the racing leauges to test before the public. Regards Jed The Pits [link lost in import] [link lost in import]
David Spark 29 May 1996#320332
>I'm sorry but, I don't want to be a hero. Its sensible men in wars who >keep their heads down when bullets start flying. Keep your head down, Jed. I think the vast majority of us understand and sympathize with you. You're the one who has to decide whether its worth the risk. I appreciate the work you guys have done on the track converters and "The Pits", and if that's the last thing you ever do, it's a heap more than anyone else has done for this "sport". Dave "davids" Sparks Sequoia Motorsports

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy