Will the ICR2 patch make qualifying sessions on street and road courses more
realistic? Proper sessions with the possibility to accelerate time would be
great. The race weekend would get depth this way. I don't like AI times that
are drawn by lot. Because the AI cars drive their laptimes in the practise
session I suppose it wouldn't be so difficult to make them really drive their
qualifying run, too. Or how is it, Rick?
Jussi
Quoted text (8 lines)
>Subject: ICR2 qualifying >Date: 2 May 1996 20:40:36 GMT >Will the ICR2 patch make qualifying sessions on street and road courses more >realistic? Proper sessions with the possibility to accelerate time would be >great. The race weekend would get depth this way. I don't like AI times that >are drawn by lot. Because the AI cars drive their laptimes in the practise >session I suppose it wouldn't be so difficult to make them really drive their >qualifying run, too. Or how is it, Rick?>Will the ICR2 patch make qualifying sessions on street and road courses more
>realistic? Proper sessions with the possibility to accelerate time would be
>great. The race weekend would get depth this way. I don't like AI times that
>are drawn by lot. Because the AI cars drive their laptimes in the practise
>session I suppose it wouldn't be so difficult to make them really drive their
>qualifying run, too. Or how is it, Rick?
The qualify sessions have not changed.
Rick Genter
Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
Sierra On-Line, Inc.
I found it out today when I was racing ICR2 and using the F196 on
laguna and the traction and power values are higher than the Indycars so
they actually outqualified the computer generated numbers! My first lap I
had the pole then next time around I was fifth!. I was dumbfounded but
soon figured this out


































